Tag Archive | "Spain"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

S&P Downgrades France and 8 Other Eurozone Sovereigns

Posted on 17 January 2012 by Tea Server

French President Nicolas Sarkozy (AFP, Pierre-Philippe Marcou)

Standard and Poor’s rating agency has lowered the credit ratings of 9 eurozone members, including formerly AAA-rated France and Austria. The move is significant, affecting as it does the future of the eurozone’s bail-out fund, the French presidential election, the roll-over of existing European sovereign debt, and more. However, the downgrade is not really a catastrophe for the nations downgraded nor for the European economy’s prospects. Our purpose here is to understand what the downgrade is, what it means and what it may not mean.

First off, what is a sovereign credit rating and what does a downgrade mean? There are numerous entities in finance that offer their well-informed (or otherwise) opinions about a variety of investment instruments. What we are concerned with here are the three main credit rating agencies: S&P, Fitch and my former employer Moody’s. What they do is issue a rating, that is an alphanumeric symbol, that encapsulates the agency’s detailed analysis of a debtor’s ability and willingness to repay a debt. In that sense, their ratings aren’t a whole lot different from the FICO score you have that is supposed to tell lenders about your creditworthiness.

While the methodologies vary a bit from one agency to another, the ratings scales of each are comparable by and large. For example, AAA is the best rating possible (Aaa at Moody’s). Junk status is about 10 notches below that at BB+ (Ba1 Moody’s) , and default is another 10 or so notches down. Because these agencies have been in the business of issuing ratings for decades (Moody’s was founded in 1900), it is possible to tie actual default experiences to the ratings. S&P’s can be found here.

On Friday, France and Austria fell one notch from AAA to AA+, Italy fell a couple of notches from A to BBB+, Spain went down one from AA- to A, Cyprus dropped two notches to BB+, Portugal’s two notch fall leaves it at BB (junk status, and it also has a negative outlook), Malta went down one notch to A- from A, Slovakia fell a notch to A from A+, and Slovenia is one notch lower at A+ from AA-. The other members of the eurozone retain their ratings. That means Germany, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Finland kept their AAA. For the record, the other members states and their S&P ratings are: Belgium (AA), Estonia (AA-), Greece (CC) and Ireland (BBB).

What is extremely important to remember is that the downgrades were only to the ratings issued by S&P. Moody’s and Fitch did nothing. In their eyes, France and Austria (and the USA for that matter) are still AAA. Split ratings, when the agencies don’t agree exactly, are rather common. And in every regulation where ratings agencies are mentioned, two different agencies’ opinions matter, not three. So, there is a real question as to whether Austria and France are still AAA or not. The market, of course, is not focused on the dog that didn’t bark – it’s paying attention to S&P despite it having the minority opinion.

Be that as it may, the S&P downgrades for France and Austria are economically inconvenient but not really all that important for investors. Yes, both will have to pay a bit more in interest to fund their debts. However, a study by JPMorgan Chase looking at the nine sovereign borrowers that lost their AAA ratings between 1998 and the US downgrade in August shows an increase of 2 basis points (or 0.02%) in the following week. Is it a make or break situation if your mortgage is 4.12% or 4.14%? France and Austria will face no funding problems as a result of the downgrade. And indeed, the US saw its borrowing costs actually decline immediately after S&P downgraded it a few months ago.

The reason for this minimal change lies in the default record of AA+ issuers. According to the chart cited above, issuers rated AAA will default 0.00% of the time in the next 12 months. An issuer with a rating of AA+ has the same default rate over 12 months. Over a 5-year period, the default rate for AAA issuers is 0.10%; for an AA+ debtor, it’s 0.15%. In other words, if you lend to France or Austria by buying a 3-year bond, you still have a 99+% chance of getting paid back in full with interest on time.

Where the downgrades do become problematic is in the political sphere. In three months’ time, the French will go to the polls to elect a president. France lost its AAA rating on Nicholas Sarkozy’s watch, and whether justly or not, he will take some blame for it – the leftish newspaper Liberation ran a headline calling him S_RKOZY, having lost an “A” of his own. He currently trails socialist candidate Francois Hollande by 10% in the polls. With 53% of the electorate believing that the loss of the AAA rating is a serious matter, the downgrade only makes his re-election more difficult.

In the end, though, the ratings come back to the issue that undermined them in the first place – the euro. The bail-out fund that has kept Greece, Ireland and Portugal afloat so far, the European Financial Stability Facility, was rated AAA because of its backing from AAA-rated sovereigns. However, 16 January 2012, S&P dropped that rating to AA+ because of the French and Austrian downgrades. S&P said that the EFSF could get its AAA back if it could obtain more guarantees (from whom I wonder?) or if it raised less money that would be better protected by the existing guarantees. A smaller bail-out fund, however, is less likely to succeed at stabilizing the eurozone. At the same time, a fund rated less than AAA will have to pay more for its funds, and that will make the bail-out fund less effective as well.

So what does it all mean? Objectively, the difference between AAA and AA+ is very small, and it should not have much impact. Markets, however, are never objective. They are fueled by greed and fear. S&P’s downgrade of these nations has made the eurozone’s problems harder to solve.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why Relevancy in Link Building Is a Myth

Posted on 10 January 2012 by Tea Server

Relevant links is one of the most heard concepts in link building. Online marketing aficionados will no doubt have heard it at least multiple times during their career, especially when they have just started out grasping the basic concepts of search engine optimization. A simple glance at any SEO forum can prove that as users engage in hot debates about how it is always only about relevancy links and about how you should always focus on obtaining links from 100% related websites. Otherwise, those links you just obtained will be merely a huge waste of time.

Do Check: Importance of Link Building

Relevant Link building Why Relevancy in Link Building Is a Myth

However, the issue of relevancy in link building is largely a myth as I will demonstrate in this article. There is obviously a certain advantage in obtaining truly relevant links but to argue that “irrelevant” links are useless is farcical. A link is a link, whether it comes from a relevant website or not. If you are starting out on link building and are worried about the issue of relevant versus irrelevant links, you should thus take the time to know exactly what the debate entails.

What are Relevant Links?

A relevant link is described as one that come from a website that deals with the same subject. As a simple example, taking the concept of relevant links into consideration, you should aim to obtain links from travel websites for your own travel blog or website. Taking this relevancy even further, if your website deals with travel to Mauritius, it would then be a great idea to obtain links from websites that also deal with travel to Mauritius (which typically is not going to happen). As such, there are actually various degrees of relevancy when it comes to links.

The Argument for Relevant Links

A hotly debated link building and search engine optimization topic is that only relevant links work. This side of the argument advances the fact that search engines will disregard links that are not relevant to the topic of the linking website or give these less weight. However, while search engines are now indeed extremely complex and can understand tons of things, it is still difficult for them to actually properly deal with relevancy in most cases. This is made even harder due to the fact that it is downright impossible to take into account people’s linking behavior.

For example, someone may be running a football blog from London in the United Kingdom and wish to link to a car rental website in Spain after traveling there to watch a football match. He might be thrilled to link to this particular website for football fans who want to rent a car during their holiday in Spain. While the websites in this example have absolutely nothing in common and this is technically an irrelevant link, it is actually a completely genuine link and. Moreover, in this specific case, the link to the car rental website is a true popularity vote as there was no link building or link baiting involved.

Similarly, we need to remember that just because someone runs a kind of website, that does not mean that is all he is interested about. It is also now becoming increasingly common for websites to deal with multiple topics that often have nothing in common. In these cases, the concept of relevant links become even harder to enforce, and search engines have no foolproof ways of knowing exactly when to count and disregard links other than to look for the Nofollow tag.

Moreover, the advent of social media is disputing the relevancy theory even more as links obtained through social networks cannot be given any relevancy measure. As such, you should not waste too much time worry about relevancy when developing strategies to earn links. You should instead focus on simply earning links and making sure those links will stay. Your search engine ranking will duly rise whether or not these links come from truly relevant websites.

The author writes on behalf of the Région Réunion website, which is very notable for fans of Reunion island for its exhaustive Culture Réunion and Economie Ile de la Réunion editorials.

Similar Posts:

Syndicated from: Telecom & Technology News

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Muhammad The Prophet

Posted on 07 January 2012 by Tea Server



Muhammad The Prophet

Re-printed from “Islam and Modern age”, Hydrabad, March 1978.

In the desert of Arabia was Muhammad (pbuh) born, according to Muslim historians, on April 20, 571. The name means highly praised. He is to me the greatest mind among all the sons of Arabia. He means so much more than all the poets and kings that preceded him in that impenetrable desert of red sand.

When he appeared Arabia was a desert — a nothing. Out of nothing a new world was fashioned by the mighty spirit of Muhammad (pbuh) — a new life, a new culture, a new civilization, a new kingdom which extended from Morocco to Indies and influenced the thought and life of three continents — Asia, Africa and Europe.

When I thought of writing on Muhammad (pbuh) the prophet, I was a bit hesitant because it was to write about a religion I do not profess and it is a delicate matter to do so for there are many persons professing various religions and belonging to diverse school of thought and denominations even in same religion. Though it is sometimes, claimed that religion is entirely personal yet it can not be gain-said that it has a tendency to envelop the whole universe seen as well unseen.

It somehow permeates something or other our hearts, our souls, our minds their conscious as well as subconscious and unconscious levels too. The problem assumes overwhelming importance when there is a deep conviction that our past, present and future all hang by the soft delicate, tender silked cord. If we further happen to be highly sensitive, the center of gravity is very likely to be always in a state of extreme tension. Looked at from this point of view, the less said about other religion the better. Let our religions be deeply hidden and embedded in the resistance of our innermost hearts fortified by unbroken seals on our lips.

But there is another aspect of this problem. Man lives in society. Our lives are bound with the lives of others willingly or unwillingly, directly or indirectly. We eat the food grown in the same soil, drink water, from the same the same spring and breathe the same air. Even while staunchly holding our own views, it would be helpful, if we try to adjust ourselves to our surroundings, if we also know to some extent, how the mind our neighbor moves and what the main springs of his actions are. From this angle of vision it is highly desirable that one should try to know all religions of the world, in the proper sprit, to promote mutual understanding and better appreciation of our neighbourhood, immediate and remote.

Further, our thoughts are not scattered as appear to be on the surface. They have got themselves crystallized around a few nuclei in the form of great world religions and living faiths that guide and motivate the lives of millions that inhabit this earth of ours. It is our duty, in one sense if we have the ideal of ever becoming a citizen of the world before us, to make a little attempt to know the great religions and system of philosophy that have ruled mankind.

In spite of these preliminary remarks, the ground in these field of religion, where there is often a conflict between intellect and emotion is so slippery that one is constantly reminded of fools that rush in where angels fear to tread. It is also not so complex from another point of view. The subject of my writing is about the tenets of a religion which is historic and its prophet who is also a historic personality. Even a hostile critic like Sir William Muir speaking about the holy Quran says that. “There is probably in the world no other book which has remained twelve centuries with so pure text.” I may also add Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is also a historic personality, every event of whose life has been most carefully recorded and even the minutes details preserved intact for the posterity. His life and works are not wrapped in mystery.

My work today is further lightened because those days are fast disappearing when Islam was highly misrepresented by some of its critics for reasons political and otherwise. Prof. Bevan writes in Cambridge Medieval History, “Those account of Muhammad (pbuh) and Islam which were published in Europe before the beginning of 19th century are now to be regarded as literary curiosities.” My problem is to write this monograph is easier because we are now generally not fed on this kind of history and much time need be spent on pointing out our misrepresentation of Islam.

The theory of Islam and Sword for instance is not heard now frequently in any quarter worth the name. The principle of Islam that there is no compulsion in religion is well known. Gibbon, a historian of world repute says, “A pernicious tenet has been imputed to Muhammad (pbuh)ans, the duty of extirpating all the religions by sword.” This charge based on ignorance and bigotry, says the eminent historian, is refuted by Quran, by history of Musalman conquerors and by their public and legal toleration of Christian worship. The great success of Muhammad (pbuh)’s life had been effected by sheer moral force, without a stroke of sword.

But in pure self-defence, after repeated efforts of conciliation had utterly failed, circumstances dragged him into the battlefield. But the prophet of Islam changed the whole strategy of the battlefield. The total number of casualties in all the wars that took place during his lifetime when the whole Arabian Peninsula came under his banner, does not exceed a few hundreds in all. But even on the battlefield he taught the Arab barbarians to pray, to pray not individually, but in congregation to God the Almighty. During the dust and storm of warfare whenever the time for prayer came, and it comes five times a every day, the congregation prayer had not to be postponed even on the battlefield. A party had to be engaged in bowing their heads before God while other was engaged with the enemy.

After finishing the prayers, the two parties had to exchange their positions. To the Arabs, who would fight for forty years on the slight provocation that a camel belonging to the guest of one tribe had strayed into the grazing land belonging to other tribe and both sides had fought till they lost 70,000 lives in all; threatening the extinction of both the tribes to such furious Arabs, the Prophet of Islam taught self-control and discipline to the extent of praying even on the battlefield. In an aged of barbarism, the Battlefield itself was humanized and strict instructions were issued not to cheat, not to break trust, not to mutilate, not to kill a child or woman or an old man, not to hew down date palm nor burn it, not to cut a fruit tree, not to molest any person engaged in worship. His own treatment with his bitterest enemies is the noblest example for his followers.

At the conquest of Mecca, he stood at the zenith of his power. The city which had refused to listen to his mission, which had tortured him and his followers, which had driven him and his people into exile and which had unrelentingly persecuted and boycotted him even when he had taken refuge in a place more than 200 miles away, that city now lay at his feet. By the laws of war he could have justly avenged all the cruelties inflicted on him and his people. But what treatment did he accord to them? Muhammad (pbuh)’s heart flowed with affection and he declared,

“This day, there is no REPROOF against you and you are all free.” “This day” he proclaimed, “I trample under my feet all distinctions between man and man, all hatred between man and man.”

This was one of the chief objects why he permitted war in self defense, that is to unite human beings. And when once this object was achieved, even his worst enemies were pardoned. Even those who killed his beloved uncle, Hamazah, mangled his body, ripped it open, even chewed a piece of his liver.

The principles of universal brotherhood and doctrine of the equality of mankind which he proclaimed represents one very great contribution of Muhammad (pbuh) to the social uplift of humanity. All great religions have preached the same doctrine but the prophet of Islam had put this theory into actual practice and its value will be fully recognized, perhaps centuries hence, when international consciousness being awakened, racial prejudices may disappear and greater brotherhood of humanity come into existence.

Miss. Sarojini Naidu speaking about this aspect of Islam says, “It was the first religion that preached and practiced democracy; for in the mosque, when the minaret is sounded and the worshipers are gathered together, the democracy of Islam is embodied five times a day when the peasant and the king kneel side by side and proclaim, God alone is great.” The great poetess of India continues, “I have been struck over and over again by this indivisible unity of Islam that makes a man instinctively a brother. When you meet an Egyptian, an Algerian and Indian and a Turk in London, it matters not that Egypt is the motherland of one and India is the motherland of another.”

Mahatma Gandhi, in his inimitable style, says “Some one has said that Europeans in South Africa dread the advent Islam — Islam that civilized Spain, Islam that took the torch light to Morocco and preached to the world the Gospel of brotherhood. The Europeans of South Africa dread the Advent of Islam. They may claim equality with the white races. They may well dread it, if brotherhood is a sin. If it is equality of colored races then their dread is well founded.”

Every year, during the Haj, the world witnesses the wonderful spectacle of this international Exhibition of Islam in leveling all distinctions of race, color and rank. Not only the Europeans, the African, the Arabian, the Persian, the Indians, the Chinese all meet together in Mecca as members of one divine family, but they are clad in one dress every person in two simple pieces of white seamless cloth, one piece round the loin the other piece over the shoulders, bare head without pomp or ceremony, repeating “Here am I O God; at thy command; thou art one and alone; Here am I.” Thus there remains nothing to differentiate the high from the low and every pilgrim carries home the impression of the international significance of Islam.

In the opinion of Prof. Hurgronje “the league of nations founded by prophet of Islam put the principle of international unity of human brotherhood on such Universal foundations as to show candle to other nations.” In the words of same Professor “the fact is that no nation of the world can show a parallel to what Islam has done the realization of the idea of the League of Nations.”

The prophet of Islam brought the reign of democracy in its best form. The Caliph Ali and the son in-law of the prophet, the Caliph Mansur, Abbas, the son of Caliph Mamun and many other caliphs and kings had to appear before the judge as ordinary men in Islamic courts. Even today we all know how the black Negroes were treated by the civilized white races. Consider the state of BILAL, a Negro Slave, in the days of the prophet of Islam nearly 14 centuries ago.

The office of calling Muslims to prayer was considered to be of status in the early days of Islam and it was offered to this Negro slave. After the conquest of Mecca, the Prophet ordered him to call for prayer and the Negro slave, with his black color and his thick lips, stood over the roof of the holy mosque at Mecca called the Ka’ba the most historic and the holiest mosque in the Islamic world, when some proud Arabs painfully cried loud, “Oh, this black Negro Slave, woe be to him. He stands on the roof of holy Ka’ba to call for prayer.” At that moment, the prophet announced to the world, this verse of the holy QURAN for the first time.

“O mankind, surely we have created you, families and tribes, so you may know one another. Surely, the most honorable of you with God is MOST RIGHTEOUS AMONG you. Surely, God is Knowing, Aware.”

And these words of the holy Quran created such a mighty transformation that the Caliph of Islam, the purest of Arabs by birth, offered their daughter in marriage to this Negro Slave, and whenever, the second Caliph of Islam, known to history as Umar the great, the commander of faithful, saw this Negro slave, he immediately stood in reverence and welcomed him by “Here come our master; Here come our lord.” What a tremendous change was brought by Quran in the Arabs, the proudest people at that time on the earth. This is the reason why Goethe, the greatest of German poets, speaking about the Holy Quran declared that, “This book will go on exercising through all ages a most potent influence.” This is also the reason why George Bernard Shaw says, “If any religion has a chance or ruling over England, say, Europe, within the next 100 years, it is Islam”.

It is this same democratic spirit of Islam that emancipated women from the bondage of man. Sir Charles Edward Archibald Hamilton says “Islam teaches the inherent sinlessness of man. It teaches that man and woman and woman have come from the same essence, posses the same soul and have been equipped with equal capabilities for intellectual, spiritual and moral attainments.”

The Arabs had a very strong tradition that one who can smite with the spear and can wield the sword would inherit. But Islam came as the defender of the weaker sex and entitled women to share the inheritance of their parents. It gave women, centuries ago right of owning property, yet it was only 12 centuries later , in 1881, that England, supposed to be the cradle of democracy adopted this institution of Islam and the act was called “the married woman act”, but centuries earlier, the Prophet of Islam had proclaimed that “Woman are twin halves of men. The rights of women are sacred. See that women maintained rights granted to them.”

Islam is not directly concerned with political and economic systems, but indirectly and in so far as political and economic affairs influence man’s conduct, it does lay down some very important principles to govern economic life. According to Prof. Massignon, it maintains the balance between exaggerated opposites and has always in view the building of character which is the basis of civilization. This is secured by its law of inheritance, by an organized system of charity known as Zakat, and by regarding as illegal all anti-social practices in the economic field like monopoly, usury, securing of predetermined unearned income and increments, cornering markets, creating monopolies, creating an artificial scarcity of any commodity in order to force the prices to rise. Gambling is illegal. Contribution to schools, to places of worship, hospitals, digging of wells, opening of orphanages are highest acts of virtue. Orphanages have sprung for the first time, it is said, under the teaching of the prophet of Islam. The world owes its orphanages to this prophet born an orphan. “Good all this” says Carlyle about Muhammad (pbuh). “The natural voice of humanity, of pity and equity, dwelling in the heart of this wild son of nature, speaks.”

A historian once said a great man should be judged by three tests: Was he found to be of true metel by his contemporaries ? Was he great enough to raise above the standards of his age ? Did he leave anything as permanent legacy to the world at large ? This list may be further extended but all these three tests of greatness are eminently satisfied to the highest degree in case of prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Some illustrations of the last two have already been mentioned.

The first is: Was the Prophet of Islam found to be of true metel by his contemporaries?

Historical records show that all the contemporaries of Muhammad (pbuh) both friends foes, acknowledged the sterling qualities, the spotless honesty, the noble virtues, the absolute sincerity and every trustworthiness of the apostle of Islam in all walks of life and in every sphere of human activity. Even the Jews and those who did not believe in his message, adopted him as the arbiter in their personal disputes by virtue of his perfect impartiality.

Even those who did not believe in his message were forced to say “O Muhammad (pbuh), we do not call you a liar, but we deny him who has given you a book and inspired you with a message.”

They thought he was one possessed. They tried violence to cure him. But the best of them saw that a new light had dawned on him and they hastened him to seek the enlightenment. It is a notable feature in the history of prophet of Islam that his nearest relation, his beloved cousin and his bosom friends, who know him most intimately, were not thoroughly imbued with the truth of his mission and were convinced of the genuineness of his divine inspiration. If these men and women, noble, intelligent, educated and intimately acquainted with his private life had perceived the slightest signs of deception, fraud, earthliness, or lack of faith in him, Muhammad (pbuh)’s moral hope of regeneration, spiritual awakening, and social reform would all have been foredoomed to a failure and whole edifice would have crumbled to pieces in a moment. On the contrary, we find that devotion of his followers was such that he was voluntarily acknowledged as dictator of their lives. They braved for him persecutions and danger; they trusted, obeyed and honored him even in the most excruciating torture and severest mental agony caused by excommunication even unto death. Would this have been so, had they noticed the slightest backsliding in their master?

Read the history of the early converts to Islam, and every heart would melt at the sight of the brutal treatment of innocent Muslim men and women.

Sumayya, an innocent women, is cruelly torn into pieces with spears. An example is made of “Yassir whose legs are tied to two camels and the beast were are driven in opposite directions”, Khabbab bin Arth is made lie down on the bed of burning coal with the brutal legs of their merciless tyrant on his breast so that he may not move and this makes even the fat beneath his skin melt. “Khabban bin Adi is put to death in a cruel manner by mutilation and cutting off his flesh piece-meal.” In the midst of his tortures, being asked weather he did not wish Muhammad (pbuh) in his place while he was in his house with his family, the sufferer cried out that he was gladly prepared to sacrifice himself his family and children and why was it that these sons and daughters of Islam not only surrendered to their prophet their allegiance but also made a gift of their hearts and souls to their master? Is not the intense faith and conviction on part of immediate followers of Muhammad (pbuh), the noblest testimony to his sincerity and to his utter self-absorption in his appointed task?

And these men were not of low station or inferior mental caliber. Around him in quite early days, gathered what was best and noblest in Mecca, its flower and cream, men of position, rank, wealth and culture, and from his own kith and kin, those who knew all about his life. All the first four Caliphs, with their towering personalities, were converts of this period.

The Encyclopaedia Britannica says that “Muhammad (pbuh) is the most successful of all Prophets and religious personalities”.

But the success was not the result of mere accident. It was not a hit of fortune. It was a recognition of fact that he was found to be true metal by his contemporaries. It was the result of his admirable and all compelling personality.

The personality of Muhammad (pbuh)! It is most difficult to get into the truth of it. Only a glimpse of it I can catch. What a dramatic succession of picturesque scenes. There is Muhammad (pbuh) the Prophet, there is Muhammad (pbuh) the General; Muhammad (pbuh) the King; Muhammad (pbuh) the Warrior; Muhammad (pbuh) the Businessman; Muhammad (pbuh) the Preacher; Muhammad (pbuh) the Philosopher; Muhammad (pbuh) the Statesman; Muhammad (pbuh) the Orator; Muhammad (pbuh) the reformer; Muhammad (pbuh) the Refuge of orphans; Muhammad (pbuh) the Protector of slaves; Muhammad (pbuh) the Emancipator of women; Muhammad (pbuh) the Law-giver; Muhammad (pbuh) the Judge; Muhammad (pbuh) the Saint.

And in all these magnificent roles, in all these departments of human activities, he is like, a hero..

Orphan hood is extreme of helplessness and his life upon this earth began with it; Kingship is the height of the material power and it ended with it. From an orphan boy to a persecuted refugee and then to an overlord, spiritual as well as temporal, of a whole nation and Arbiter of its destinies, with all its trials and temptations, with all its vicissitudes and changes, its lights and shades, its up and downs, its terror and splendour, he has stood the fire of the world and came out unscathed to serve as a model in every face of life. His achievements are not limited to one aspect of life, but cover the whole field of human conditions.

If for instance, greatness consist in the purification of a nation, steeped in barbarism and immersed in absolute moral darkness, that dynamic personality who has transformed, refined and uplifted an entire nation, sunk low as the Arabs were, and made them the torch-bearer of civilization and learning, has every claim to greatness. If greatness lies in unifying the discordant elements of society by ties of brotherhood and charity, the prophet of the desert has got every title to this distinction. If greatness consists in reforming those warped in degrading and blind superstition and pernicious practices of every kind, the prophet of Islam has wiped out superstitions and irrational fear from the hearts of millions. If it lies in displaying high morals, Muhammad (pbuh) has been admitted by friend and foe as Al Amin, or the faithful. If a conqueror is a great man, here is a person who rose from helpless orphan and an humble creature to be the ruler of Arabia, the equal to Chosroes and Caesars, one who founded great empire that has survived all these 14 centuries. If the devotion that a leader commands is the criterion of greatness, the prophet’s name even today exerts a magic charm over millions of souls, spread all over the world.

He had not studied philosophy in the school of Athens of Rome, Persia, India, or China. Yet, He could proclaim the highest truths of eternal value to mankind. Illiterate himself, he could yet speak with an eloquence and fervour which moved men to tears, to tears of ecstasy. Born an orphan blessed with no worldly goods, he was loved by all. He had studied at no military academy; yet he could organize his forces against tremendous odds and gained victories through the moral forces which he marshalled. Gifted men with genius for preaching are rare. Descartes included the perfect preacher among the rarest kind in the world. Hitler in his Mein Kamp has expressed a similar view. He says “A great theorist is seldom a great leader. An Agitator is more likely to posses these qualities. He will always be a great leader. For leadership means ability to move masses of men. The talents to produce ideas has nothing in common with capacity for leadership.” “But”, he says, “The Union of theorists, organizer and leader in one man, is the rarest phenomenon on this earth; Therein consists greatness.”

In the person of the Prophet of Islam the world has seen this rarest phenomenon walking on the earth, walking in flesh and blood.

And more wonderful still is what the reverend Bosworth Smith remarks, “Head of the state as well as the Church, he was Caesar and Pope in one; but, he was pope without the pope’s claims, and Caesar without the legions of Caesar, without an standing army, without a bodyguard, without a palace, without a fixed revenue. If ever any man had the right to say that he ruled by a right divine It was Muhammad (pbuh), for he had all the power without instruments and without its support. He cared not for dressing of power. The simplicity of his private life was in keeping with his public life.”

After the fall of Mecca, more than one million square miles of land lay at his feet, Lord of Arabia, he mended his own shoes and coarse woolen garments, milked the goats, swept the hearth, kindled the fire and attended the other menial offices of the family. The entire town of Medina where he lived grew wealthy in the later days of his life. Everywhere there was gold and silver in plenty and yet in those days of prosperity many weeks would elapse without a fire being kindled in the hearth of the king of Arabia, His food being dates and water.

His family would go hungry many nights successively because they could not get anything to eat in the evening. He slept on no soften bed but on a palm mat, after a long busy day to spend most of his night in prayer, often bursting with tears before his creator to grant him strength to discharge his duties. As the reports go, his voice would get choked with weeping and it would appear as if a cooking pot was on fire and boiling had commenced. On the very day of his death his only assets were few coins a part of which went to satisfy a debt and rest was given to a needy person who came to his house for charity. The clothes in which he breathed his last had many patches. The house from where light had spread to the world was in darkness because there was no oil in the lamp.

Circumstances changed, but the prophet of God did not. In victory or in defeat, in power or in adversity, in affluence or in indigence, he is the same man, disclosed the same character. Like all the ways and laws of God, Prophets of God are unchangeable.

An honest man, as the saying goes, is the noblest work of God, Muhammad (pbuh) was more than honest. He was human to the marrow of his bones. Human sympathy, human love was the music of his soul. To serve man, to elevate man, to purify man, to educate man, in a word to humanize man-this was the object of his mission, the be-all and end all of his life. In thought, in word, in action he had the good of humanity as his sole inspiration, his sole guiding principle.

He was most unostentatious and selfless to the core. What were the titles he assumed? Only true servant of God and His Messenger. Servant first, and then a messenger. A Messenger and prophet like many other prophets in every part of the world, some known to you, many not known you. If one does not believe in any of these truths one ceases to be a Muslim. It is an article of faith.

“Looking at the circumstances of the time and unbounded reverence of his followers” says a western writer “the most miraculous thing about Muhammad (pbuh) is, that he never claimed the power of working miracles.” Miracles were performed but not to propagate his faith and were attributed entirely to God and his inscrutable ways. He would plainly say that he was a man like others. He had no treasures of earth or heaven. Nor did he claim to know the secrets of that lie in womb of future. All this was in an age when miracles were supposed to be ordinary occurrences, at the back and call of the commonest saint, when the whole atmosphere was surcharged with supernaturalism in Arabia and outside Arabia.

He turned the attention of his followers towards the study of nature and its laws, to understand them and appreciate the Glory of God. The Quran says,

“God did not create the heavens and the earth and all that is between them in play. He did not create them all but with the truth. But most men do not know.”

The world is not illusion, nor without purpose. It has been created with the truth. The number of verses inviting close observation of nature are several times more than those that relate to prayer, fasting, pilgrimage etc. all put together. The Muslim under its influence began to observe nature closely and this give birth to the scientific spirit of the observation and experiment which was unknown to the Greeks. While the Muslim Botanist Ibn Baitar wrote on Botany after collecting plants from all parts of the world, described by Myer in his Gesch. der Botanikaa-s, a monument of industry, while Al Byruni traveled for forty years to collect mineralogical specimens, and Muslim Astronomers made some observations extending even over twelve years.

Aristotle wrote on Physics without performing a single experiment, wrote on natural history, carelessly stating without taking the trouble to ascertain the most verifiable fact that men have more teeth than animal. Galen, the greatest authority on classical anatomy informed that the lower jaw consists of two bones, a statement which is accepted unchallenged for centuries till Abdul Lateef takes the trouble to examine a human skeleton. After enumerating several such instances, Robert Priffault concludes in his well known book The making of humanity,

“The debt of our science to the Arabs does not consist in starting discovers or revolutionary theories. Science owes a great more to Arabs culture; it owes is existence.”

The same writer says “The Greeks systematized, generalized and theorized but patient ways of investigation, the accumulation of positive knowledge, the minute methods of science, detailed and prolonged observation, experimental inquiry, were altogether alien to Greek temperament. What we call science arose in Europe as result of new methods of investigation, of the method of experiment, observation, measurement, of the development of Mathematics in form unknown to the Greeks. That spirit and these methods, concludes the same author, were introduced into the European world by Arabs.”

It is the same practical character of the teaching of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) that gave birth to the scientific spirit, that has also sanctified the daily labours and the so called mundane affairs. The Quran says that God has created man to worship him but the word worship has a connotation of its own. Gods worship is not confined to prayer alone, but every act that is done with the purpose of winning approval of God and is for the benefit of the humanity comes under its purview. Islam sanctifies life and all its pursuits provided they are performed with honesty, justice and pure intents.

It obliterates the age-long distinction between the sacred and profane. The Quran says if you eat clean things and thank God for it, it is an act of worship. It is saying of the prophet of Islam that Morsel of food that one places in the mouth of his wife is an act of virtue to be rewarded by God. Another tradition of the Prophet says “He who is satisfying the desire of his heart will be rewarded by God provided the methods adopted are permissible.” A person was listening to him exclaimed ‘O Prophet of God, he is answering the calls of passions, is only satisfying the craving of his heart. Forthwith came the reply, “Had he adopted an awful method for the satisfaction of his urge, he would have been punished; then why should he not be rewarded for following the right course.”

This new conception of religion that it should also devote itself to the betterment of this life rather than concern itself exclusively with super mundane affairs, has led to a new orientation of moral values. Its abiding influence on the common relations of mankind in the affairs of every day life, its deep power over the masses, its regulation of their conception of rights and duty, its suitability and adaptability to the ignorant savage and the wise philosopher are characteristic features of the teaching of the Prophet of Islam.

But it should be most carefully born in mind this stress on good actions is not the sacrifice correctness of faith. While there are various school of thought, one praising faith at the expense of deeds, another exhausting various acts to the detriment of correct belief, Islam is based on correct faith and righteous actions. Means are important as the end and ends are as important as the means. It is an organic Unity. Together they live and thrive. Separate them and both decay and die. In Islam faith can not be divorced from the action. Right knowledge should be transferred into right action to produce the right results.

How often the words came in Quran — Those who believe and do good thing, they alone shall enter paradise. Again and again, not less than fifty times these words are repeated as if too much stress can not be laid on them. Contemplation is encouraged but mere contemplation is not the goal. Those who believe and do nothing can not exist in Islam. These who believe and do wrong are inconceivable. Divine law is the law of effort and not of ideals. It chalks out for the men the path of eternal progress from knowledge to action and from action to satisfaction.

But what is the correct faith from which right action spontaneously proceeds resulting in complete satisfaction. Here the central doctrine of Islam is the Unity of God. There is no God but God is the pivot from which hangs the whole teaching and practice of Islam. He is unique not only as regards his divine being but also as regards his divine attributes.

As regards the attributes of God, Islam adopts here as in other things too, the law of golden mean. It avoids on the one hand, the view of God which divests the divine being of every attribute and rejects, on the other, the view which likens him to things material. The Quran says, On the one hand, there is nothing which is like him, on the other , it affirms that he is Seeing, Hearing, Knowing. He is the King who is without a stain of fault or deficiency, the mighty ship of His power floats upon the ocean of justice and equity. He is the Beneficent, the Merciful. He is the Guardian over all. Islam does not stop with this positive statement.

It adds further which is its most special characteristic, the negative aspects of problem. There is also no one else who is guardian over everything. He is the meander of every breakage, and no one else is the meander of any breakage. He is the restorer of every loss and no one else is the restorer of any loss what-so-over. There is no God but one God, above any need, the maker of bodies, creator of souls, the Lord of the day of judgment, and in short, in the words of Quran, to him belong all excellent qualities.

Regarding the position of man in relation to the Universe, the Quran says:

“God has made subservient to you whatever is on the earth or in universe. You are destined to rule over the Universe.”

But in relation to God, the Quran says:

“O man God has bestowed on you excellent faculties and has created life and death to put you to test in order to see whose actions are good and who has deviated from the right path.”

In spite of free will which he enjoys, to some extent, every man is born under certain circumstances and continues to live under certain circumstances beyond his control. With regard to this God says, according to Islam, it is my will to create any man under condition that seem best to me. cosmic plans finite mortals can not fully comprehend. But I will certainly test you in prosperity as well in adversity, in health as well as in sickness, in heights as well as in depths. My ways of testing differ from man to man, from hour to hour. In adversity do not despair and do resort to unlawful means. It is but a passing phase.

In prosperity do not forget God. God-gifts are given only as trusts. You are always on trial, every moment on test. In this sphere of life there is not to reason why, there is but to do and die. If you live in accordance with God; and if you die, die in the path of God. You may call it fatalism. but this type of fatalism is a condition of vigorous increasing effort, keeping you ever on the alert. Do not consider this temporal life on earth as the end of human existence. There is a life after death and it is eternal.

Life after death is only a connection link, a door that opens up hidden reality of life. Every action in life however insignificant, produces a lasting effect. It is correctly recorded somehow. Some of the ways of God are known to you, but many of his ways are hidden from you. What is hidden in you and from you in this world will be unrolled and laid open before you in the next. the virtuous will enjoy the blessing of God which the eye has not seen, nor has the ear heard, nor has it entered into the hearts of men to conceive of they will march onward reaching higher and higher stages of evolution. Those who have wasted opportunity in this life shall under the inevitable law, which makes every man taste of what he has done, be subjugated to a course of treatment of the spiritual diseases which they have brought about with their own hands. Beware, it is terrible ordeal.

Bodily pain is torture, you can bear somehow. Spiritual pain is hell, you will find it almost unbearable. Fight in this life itself the tendencies of the spirit prone to evil, tempting to lead you into iniquities ways. Reach the next stage when the self-accusing sprit in your conscience is awakened and the soul is anxious to attain moral excellence and revolt against disobedience. This will lead you to the final stage of the soul at rest, contented with God, finding its happiness and delight in him alone. The soul no more stumbles. The stage of struggle passes away. Truth is victorious and falsehood lays down its arms. All complexes will then be resolved. Your house will not be divided against itself. Your personality will get integrated round the central core of submission to the will of God and complete surrender to his divine purpose. All hidden energies will then be released. The soul then will have peace. God will then address you:

“O thou soul that art at rest, and rests fully contented with thy Lord return to thy Lord. He pleased with thee and thou pleased with him; So enter among my servants and enter into my paradise.”

This is the final goal for man; to become, on the, one hand, the master of the universe and on the other, to see that his soul finds rest in his Lord, that not only his Lord will be pleased with him but that he is also pleased with his Lord. Contentment, complete contentment, satisfaction, complete satisfaction, peace, complete peace. The love of God is his food at this stage and he drinks deep at the fountain of life. Sorrow and defeat do not overwhelm him and success does not find him in vain and exulting.

The western nations are only trying to become the master of the Universe. But their souls have not found peace and rest.

Thomas Carlyle, struck by this philosophy of life writes “and then also Islam-that we must submit to God; that our whole strength lies in resigned submission to Him, whatsoever he does to us, the thing he sends to us, even if death and worse than death, shall be good, shall be best; we resign ourselves to God.” The same author continues “If this be Islam, says Goethe, do we not all live in Islam?” Carlyle himself answers this question of Goethe and says “Yes, all of us that have any moral life, we all live so. This is yet the highest wisdom that heaven has revealed to our earth.”

Azmat N. Khan

*********

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Rafale : Hot favourite for MMRCA

Posted on 02 January 2012 by Tea Server

It seems that Indian airforce is more content with Rafale than the Eurofighter, As reported by Deccan Chronicles :

 
Just why has the Indian Air Force (IAF) short-listed the French
Rafale and the Eurofighter Typhoon ahead of four other contenders,
including the US F-16 and F/A-18 fighters, for the Rs 42, 000 crore
medium multi-role combat aircraft (MMRCA) contract?

The down selection at the end of a prolonged evaluation of the six
fighter jets was evidently based on the fact that the Rafale and the
Typhoon were the most modern airframes and better equipped compared to
F/A-18 Super Hornet and F-16 IN of the US, MiG-35 of Russia, and JAS-39
Gripen of Sweden.

The Rafale and the Typhoon met most of the 630 technical attributes
mentioned in the request for proposal (RFP) by the ministry of defence,
while the others lacked either in performance or had limitations in
terms of future upgrades.

“Rafale figures a notch higher than Typhoon in terms of performance
and involves easier adaptability as it is logistically and operationally
similar to Mirage-2000, used extensively by our boys during the Kargil
conflict in 1999. The French government has also cleared the technology
transfer, including the AESA (active electronically scanned array)
radar,” sources in the IAF told Deccan Chronicle.

The other discreet offering by Dassault Aviation too made sense: save
on the $1.5 billion project to upgrade 52 Mirage-2000 jets by acquiring
the Rafale.

Interestingly, all six fighters were in the race till April 17, the
deadline for submission of modified offset proposals. The
representatives of these firms were informed of the Union government’s
decision to relax the offset policy mentioned in the request for
proposal (RFP).

The original rider that half the value of the $ 10.5 billion contract
be passed on to domestic firms was modified, fixing it at 30 per cent
of the deal. “We were all expecting a word on extension of commercial
proposals on the last day, April 28, but got to know that only Dassault
Aviation and Eurofighter have been invited for discussions,” said a
representative of Saab AB.

Those who lost out have made it known that they would raise issues
concerning the price and other attributes of Rafale and Typhoon. The two
aircraft are said to be the highest priced among those in the contest
when looked at from a unit price point of view. Second, the
Eurofighter’s AESA radar is still under development. Only the two US
fighters have operational AESA radars on them.

If India finally picks the Rafale, it would be only the second air
force after the French Air Force to induct these fighters into its
fleet.

India has asked Dassault SA and Eurofighter GmbH to hold their price
bids until the end of the year. The deal is expected to be signed by
March 2012.

The Final Two

Eurofighter Typhoon – Germany/Britain/Italy/Spain

Dassault Rafale — France

Out of the contest

Lockheed Martin’s F-16IN – USA

Boeing’s F/A-18 Super Hornet – USA

SAAB’s Gripen JAS-39 – Sweden

Mikoyan-Gureywich’s MiG-35 – Russia

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Year in Review 2011: When Human Rights “Went Viral”

Posted on 01 January 2012 by Tea Server

Egyptian women marching during the January 25 revolution. Photo by Hossam el-Hamalawy

Many things could be said about the past year, but at the very least it could not be considered boring. Within two weeks of the new year, protests over government corruption in Tunisia ousted its long standing dictator, Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali. That event, which took many observers by surprise, triggered a wave of protests throughout the region. As the year went on, protests in Egypt overthrew Hosni Mubarak and brought on a NATO intervention in Libya while the Yemeni, Syrian and Bahraini governments responded to discontent in their countries with increasing violence and Morocco introduced a new constitution. Of course such protests were not limited to North Africa and the Middle East; as early as January similar protests against corruption and authoritarianism were seen in Gabon before spreading to Mauritania, Djibouti, Uganda, Malawi, Swaziland and Senegal. Further north, protest movements emerged in Spain and Greece against government austerity measures and high unemployment, while Israelis took to the streets over the summer in record numbers in the name of social justice and protests grew in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. By the end of the year, the Occupy movement broke out in the US and Canada against the large involvement of money in politics and the lack of economic opportunity for the average citizen while large student protests over educational reform broke out in Colombia and Chile. And finally, in December protests against government corruption reached all the way to the doors of the Kremlin in Russia. So numerous and active has the protest calendar been over the past 12 months, it is quite possible to narrate the entire year only in major protest movements and events.

Of course, other events happened in the field of human rights. The drama of last year’s contested presidential elections in Cote d’Ivoire continued into 2011 with open fighting between parties loyal to each of the candidates. Just two weeks after the UN Security Council approved a no-fly zone over Libya, it also adopted Resolution 1975 which allowed the French-supported peacekeeping mission there to use all necessary measures to protect civilian life. Two weeks later, incumbent president and 2010 election loser Laurent Gbagbo was arrested by UN forces in his home, ending the standoff. In late November, Gbagbo was transferred to the International Criminal Court in The Hague following an arrest warrant for crimes against humanity. His transfer means that it is likely he will be the first former head of state to stand trial at the ICC.

Both the UN intervention in Cote d’Ivoire and the NATO intervention in Libya gave the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine a boost. While some debate whether NATO overstepped its UN authorization in its campaign, possibly hurting the effectiveness of the doctrine, these two events illustrated that even the international community can learn from its past mistakes when facing imminent civilian carnage, even if the application of the policy is uneven.

Elsewhere in Africa, the Republic of South Sudan officially became independent in July after a referendum in January that saw over 98% of the population vote for independence. Yet as South Sudan celebrated a new chapter of their own history and the end of a six-year long peace process, the UN declared a famine in parts of Somalia following an ongoing drought throughout the entire region and new violence broke out along the just created border between Sudan and South Sudan.

Of course, disasters – both manmade and natural – were not limited to the Global South. In July, Anders Behring Breivik set off a car bomb in Oslo and attacked a summer camp on the Norwegian island of Utøya, killing 87 people and shocking the normally calm Nordic country. In August, a small protest against police brutality spun out of control and set off four days of rioting across the United Kingdom.

Looking at this brief summary of the past year, it is easy to understand why the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights, Navi Pillay, declared 2011 as the year where “human rights went viral.” However not all of year’s events treated human rights kindly. The execution of Muamar Gaddafi at the hands of rebel forces in Libya, and the cheers that came from some corners at the online footage of his abuse at the hands of his captors, reminded us that even monsters deserve compassion and we all have it in us to deny others basic dignity. In the US, the execution of Troy Davis brought the death penalty back into the spotlight, but even a sustained media campaign on the apparent shortcomings of the case against him could not save his life. The year was also not a good one for journalists, as the Committee to Protect Journalist announced that 45 journalists were killed in 2011, with Pakistan being the most dangerous country for journalists this year. And while some claimed 2011 to be the year of social media, that also came with tragic consequences as citizen journalists and online activists found themselves in the crosshairs of various groups, from drug cartels in Mexico to government forces in North Africa and the Middle East.

Finally, while there were many positive developments over the past 12 months, the year ended on a sour note with news that President Obama signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act, including the troublesome provision that allows the government to indefinitely detain US citizens in the United States if they are suspected of terrorism. There are many problematic aspects to this provision, not just for human rights but also for the basic principles of democracy and due process in the US. If nothing else, this quiet act at the end of 2011 will give activists a new cause to start 2012 with.

Protester in Bahrain. Photo by Al Jazeera English.

As no Year in Review would be incomplete without a list, here are some of my top picks for 2011:

Most Unexpected event

As I noted at the start, this year has been an incredibly active one for protests, the type of year that probably hasn’t been seen since 1968. Even still, 2011 has been more remarkable in many ways because of the diverse locations where these movements have sprung up and in how they built upon each other throughout the year, aided by relationships forged through social media and increased global communications. While analysts may have suggested that major uprisings or protests were due in some of these countries for a while, I doubt that any of them would have – or even could have – predicted the way these protests merged and multiplied, both online and in the streets. There is no single name for this trend or phenomenon, but that is my choice for most unexpected event of the year.

Most important person or group

Closely related to my choice for most unexpected event, my pick for the most important person or group is actually a generation. Whatever you choose to call them – Generation Y, Millennials, Generation Next, or some other iteration – their presence has been undeniable in shaping major events of the past year. In 1966, Robert F. Kennedy gave a speech at University Cape Town where he memorably stated, “Few will have the greatness to bend history, but each of us can work to change a small portion of events. And in the total of all those acts will be written the history of a generation.” After years of being mostly defined by their consumer habits and entertainment choices, this past year saw this generation find its voice against injustice, as well as the courage to work towards a different world.

Book of the year

My choice for book of the year highlights the aborted Persian Spring rather than this year’s Arab Spring. “Then They Came For Me” by Maziar Bahari tells of his months in Iran’s infamous Evin Prison for his journalistic coverage of the 2009 Iranian Election Protests. While his period in prison was Kafkaesque at times, the story also highlights the humanity of the protestors and ordinary Iranians in their search for dignity in a country that they love.

What to look for in 2012…

While 2011 was a major game-changer in some ways, on the other hand I find that my outlook for 2012 is not much different from what I predicted last year. I’m comfortable with that since much of what I predicted for 2010 came true this past year (and being only a year off is fine with me).

Digital rights and what freedom of expression means in the 21st century will continue to be a major human rights issue, especially after the EU quietly passed the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Act earlier this month and the possibility that the US House of Representatives will pass the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the new year.

Likewise protests are also likely to continue in 2012. The four countries that managed to overthrow their dictators this year – Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, and Yemen – still face significant battles in stabilizing their governments and bringing about a full democratic transition. Protests and subsequent crackdowns by the government continue in both Bahrain and Syria, with no end in sight for either. The only country in North Africa to largely escape the protests that swept the region is Algeria, but already some are predicting that may change soon. Similarly, the Occupy movement is determined to not fade away in the new year as they come up with new methods of protest even as many of their camps are disbanded. As this past year demonstrated, protests movements in one corner of the globe can bring about new movements elsewhere, so what is in store for 2012 remains a mystery to even the most astute analysts.

Corporate involvement and influence in politics is also likely to be an ongoing issue. This is the central focus of the Occupy movement, but there have been other indications that more people are focusing on corporate accountability as well. In particular, the increasing evidence of Western technology firms selling surveillance equipment to repressive regimes have raised new questions about what responsibility for-profit organization have in the consequences of their products. Elsewhere, there is growing attention on the long term impact that increased involvement of Chinese firms in Africa may have for both political and economic democracy in the region and the growth of human rights. No matter where you look, corporations are facing more scrutiny which in unlikely to go away anytime soon.

In the end, what I am left with in the final hours of 2011 is how much more optimistic I am about this coming year than I was last year. So much has happened in the past 12 months that it can boggle the mind. But while some events were heartbreaking, most of the past year has been uplifting and at times, even inspiring. If 2011 was the year when “human rights went viral” then it is now on us to make 2012 the year when the world finally consolidated those rights and made them count.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Do International Shipping Via IPad 2

Posted on 28 December 2011 by Tea Server

The IPad 2 is the derivative of the original IPad model and is used for presentations, movie viewing, as well as reading books and periodicals. Apple, Inc. announced the advent of the IPad 2 in March 2011, as well as in twenty-five other countries soon thereafter. The second-generation IPad has a lithium battery that lasts for ten hours, and an A5 processor that is nine times faster than the processor of the original IPad.

ipad 2 international shipping Do International Shipping Via IPad 2

Two versions of the IPad 2 are in existence currently: the IPad 2 wi-fi and the IPad 2 3G. The IPad 2 wi-fi model offers Internet access in the event that a wi-fi Internet connection is available. This makes the IPad 2 wi-fi a perfect reader in coffeeshops, coffeehouses, and bookstores such as Barnes and Noble. In contrast to the IPad 2 wi-fi model is the IPad 2 3G model, a version of the IPad 2 that can work in any setting, regardless of whether wi-fi Internet exists or not.

Those who rely on the IPad 2 wi-fi will find themselves surely disappointed when they enter a zone that has no wireless Internet. Though the IPad 2 3G may cost more, it is worth the price when you deliberate whether or not to have an Internet connection or not at a perfect place like the library or bookstore. If you want technology with you everywhere you go, the IPad 2 3G is the perfect device for you.

The IPad 2 3G not only stands out with its “everywhere” wireless Internet, but also its international shipping capabilities are also applaudable. Since the IPad 2 3G connects you to the World Wide Web without the presence of Internet, you can take it anywhere—even overseas. However, note two things: first, you can possess international shipping capabilities only with the IPad 2 3G. The wi-fi model will not work as far as international shipping goes. Next, even with the 3G model, you will still need to purchase a micro SIM card in whatever country you find yourself travelling.

“SIM” stands for “Subscriber Identity Module,” and is a circuit chip placed inside your IPad to reveal information about you to the carrier. The Subscriber Identity reveals information about you (the subscriber), your identity, to the IPad: phone number, billing information, and other security data.  Subscriber Identity Modules ease the process of buying a new IPhone or even a new IPad because, no matter the technological equipment, your SIM card will always register you as the person of the new IPad or IPhone.

The SIM card is only 0.76mm in size and runs at a speed of 5 Mhz. It turns out that the little chip in your IPad 2 makes all the difference in the world!

The SIM card, though little, matters a lot. If you do not possess a SIM card, you will need to buy one in the country you’re in when you travel overseas—whether to Spain or France, for example. The SIM cards in other countries are most likely prepaid cards, which means that you pay the cost of Internet up-front without any later fees.

How exactly can you internationally ship? Think about it: if you have an IPad from America, but you travel to Germany for a one-month vacation, you can buy something from a German company online and send it to your address in the States. The absence of the SIM card (and the IPad 2 3G) removes all this. You need 3G capability because you are outside of American wi-fi range; you need the SIM card so that your IPad knows that you are the current user (though you are not in your current living range).

Do Check: Affordable Laptops: How to Get the Best Value for Your Money

The Internet has revolutionized the way we think of distance. Prior to the Internet’s advent, we always believed that life had barriers—geography and time separated one place from another. Today, we believe the opposite, and distant places could not seem any closer. This is all due to the invention of the World Wide Web, as well as devices like the IPad 2 3G—devices that remind us of the impact of globalization and the gripping truth that life is, literally, in our own backyard.

The article is contributed by Calvin Scott. Calvin love for technology can’t be explained in words, it’s seamless like ocean. Visit his site for zeecontainer kopen and container verkoop.

Similar Posts:

    None Found

Incoming search terms:

  • ipad 2 3g wai fi
Syndicated from: Telecom & Technology News

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Examining the Eurofighter Typhoon to Understand What Makes It Special

Posted on 28 December 2011 by Tea Server

Funny Photoshopped Pictures | Forward this Picture

The Eurofighter is a highly maneuverable multirole Military fighter presently being developed by a 4 nation consortium consisting of Nice Britain, Germany, Italy, and Spain. In the late Nineteen Seventies, quite a lot of European air forces had been confronted with the fact that their fighter fleets had been beginning to appear outdated in

Syndicated from: Military Photoshops

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Russia Ranked 2nd Biggest Global Arms Exporter

Posted on 23 December 2011 by Tea Server



Russia became the world’s second largest arms exporter in 2011 after the
United States, the head of the Moscow-based arms think tank Centre for
Analysis of World Arms Trade (CAWAT), Igor Korotchenko said on Friday.

The CAWAT ranking revealed that Russia occupied the second position for
world arms sales in 2011 with $11.29 billion in revenues, which accounts
for 16.1 percent of all international arms supplies, Korotchenko said.
“The forecast for 2012 is $11.3 billion or 17.3 percent of global arms
sales.”

The Unitied States, however, dominates world arms exports, with over 40 percent of trade globally, or $28.76 billion.

Korotchenko also said that Russia had scored high records on arms
exports despite the fact that it had lost the Iranian market because of
the arms embargos imposed on Tehran by Washington. Moscow also supported
arms sanctions against Libya, suspending all contracts for the supply
of military hardware to the country.

The top ten biggest arms suppliers include France, Germany, Britain,
Italy, Israel, Spain, Sweden and China, according to the CAWAT ranking.

READ MORE

Syndicated from: ASIAN DEFENCE NEWS

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Southern Africa Year in Review: Democracy without Citizens?

Posted on 23 December 2011 by Tea Server

The year 2011 for Southern Africa, and sub-Saharan Africa in general, will probably be remembered for what did not happen in the light of the people-powered uprising and protests that swept across the globe.

In the Arab world, in particular North Africa, what is being now referred to as the Arab Spring made 2011 a tough year for the dictatorial regimes of Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali in Tunisia, Hosni Mubarak in Egypt, and of course Gaddafi, who was killed in Libya. In the Western world, a movement that started as Occupy Wall Street in New York stirred up similar protests across major cities in the US, Britain, Italy, Germany, France, Spain, Portugal and Asian countries as citizens fought back against growing greed and inequality. Public anger over the debt crisis brought down Prime Minister George Papandreou and Silvio Berlusconi in Greece and Italy respectively.

Yet, despite the Southern African region’s high level of poverty, unemployment, and inequality, we did not see a wave of public anger similar to what we have seen across the globe. In a case study of five Southern African countries, the Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa has found that poverty and inequality is tearing apart Zimbabwe, Swaziland, Malawi, Namibia, South Africa and Angola, with many citizens living on a mere US$1 per day. The irony here is that some of those countries, such as Namibia and South Africa, are resource-rich countries with some of the highest GDP in the world.

Amid this global backlash against greed and inequality, why were most Southern African streets (apart from isolated and sporadic protests in Malawi and Swaziland) empty, quiet, and business as usual? What happened to the militant spirit that has sent many young people toyi-toying in the streets of Namibia, Zimbabwe, and South Africa against colonialism, poverty, and social injustice in the 60s and 80s?

One answer given for this widespread citizenry indifference in Southern African has been explained in terms of the belief that some of the governments in the region would not hesitate to use harsh measures if confronted by an Arab Spring-like mass action. True to this, in Zimbabwe some 45 activists were rounded up and charged with treason for watching a Mideast uprising video. In Malawi, the security force launched a violent crackdown on the protestors, leaving at least 18 protestors dead. In Swaziland, pro-democracy activists were banned, arrested, tear-gassed, and sprayed with water cannons.

It is also true that when the uprising was under way in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, none of the Southern Africa governments (well, South Africa maybe did but flip-flopped later to save face with the radicals within the ANC and other hawkish Africanists in the region) picked up a phone to urge Mubarak, Gadaffi, or Ben Ali to exercise restraint in dealing with the protestors. Instead, what we heard from Southern African governments was the usual song of complaint about Western interference in Africa’s internal matters.

But here is another explanation: Southern African citizens’ indifference can be explained in a “been there and done that” syndrome. This is because in some ways Southern Africa is a little bit ahead of North Africa in terms of democratization, meaning that most governments in Southern Africa are products of democracy and came to power through elections. Whereas North Africa might have been stable and economically advanced but did not have democratic governments. However, a distinctive characteristic of the southern African democracy is that not only we have a democracy without democrats but also a democracy without citizens. Southern Africa’s democracies did not and do not produce citizens but subjects controlled by governments due to the hierarchical nature of Southern African politics which demands obedience and loyalty from citizens. Why? Although they claim to have fought for democracy (such as SWAPO in Namibia, ANC in South Africa, MPLA in Angola, FRELIMO in Mozambique and ZANU-PF in Zimbabwe), most ruling parties in Southern Africa don’t operate as democrats. Their politics and decision making processes are highly centralized. By the way, the same can also be said about most opposition political parties too.

It is against the backlog of this unquestioning and uncritical citizenry, that we understand why Mugabe is still in power today and why most ruling parties in that region have won elections with landslide victory. This is why the Namibian president can place a moratorium on public discussions about the SWAPO presidential succession. And this is why the ANC-dominated National Assembly in South Africa can pass a law (reversing the gains made against apartheid repressive laws and policies) to limit free speech.

On the flip side, events in North Africa made the world forget (as the international media and world government shifted its attention to the Arab Spring) about Southern Africa, especially with regard to what’s going on in Zimbabwe and Malawi

Here are a few predictions for 2012: The ruling party SWAPO’s 2012 election campaign to replace the incumbent Namibian president when his term expires is shaping up to be between Geingob (who is the vice president of SWAPO) and me Pendukeni Ithana (who is the secretary of SWAPO). One is believed to be a technocrat and the other a populist. But both are insiders, so expect less change here if either of them wins. What is clear, however, is that another potential split (this would be the third split if it happens) from the ruling party is looming as the in-fighting has already started. More is too come as we inch closer to Election Day.

In Zimbabwe, it is clear that the opposition party MDC (MDC has lost the mojo, and has been weakened by in-fighting too) is not the party that will bring down Mugabe (as it was hoped), but expect a potential split within the ruling ZANU-PF party. As Mugabe’s health continues to deteriorate, we expect infighting as members vie for control and Mugabe’s position.

On the other hand, South Africa will continue walking the populist road and of course with less transparent governance. Unless restored, expect the worst from Malawi because its life line support, which is aid from the international community, has been cut off, which is going to make life difficult for ordinary citizens. Angola and Mozambique (riding on oil) will continue unabated because we don’t really hear much about these two countries in terms of international coverage anyway. The remaining question is will Swaziland eventually collapse economically, or has it already collapsed?

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Terrorism In Pakistan

Posted on 21 December 2011 by Tea Server

Terror, terrorists, and terrorism are more frequently
burning issues of the media. After 9/11 the phenomenon of terrorism has
drastically changed the socio-economic and geo-political scenario of the
Pakistan. It has shaken the social fabric of Pakistan. Terrorism is the result
of extremism which results in different forms of manifestation of violence.
Terrorism is a tree and extremism provides balance food to grow the tree
properly. Different accused groups allegedly involved in terrorism are the
branches of this tree. Terrorism is the social evil and problem of today. The phenomenon
of the terrorism has

occurred due to socioeconomic injustice, political
disparity and quest of selfish individuals and groups to retain the power for their
vested interests. No doubt, terrorism upsets humanity on the whole and creates
unrest in the society. Although the acts of terrorism are visible everywhere in
the world, but Pakistan is facing the phenomenon of terrorism directly and
severely as a social problem. Pakistan is the front line state among
international community and consequently the people and state of Pakistan are
facing the outrage of the terrorists. The society of Pakistan was considered to
be the most peaceful society, but since 1979 after the Russian invasion in
Afghanistan the society saw great twist in the social fabric and politico
economic system. The world super powers encouraged the militant organizations
to promote the culture of Jihad (Islamic holy war) to defeat Russia. The world
powers provided their huge support to the government of Pakistan and related
militant organizations in the form of money, weapons and politico moral
support. Meanwhile, political instability, corruption, social injustice and
economic disparity added fuel on fire in giving rise to different forms of
manifestation of terrorism. With the collapse of Russia from the world order
the geo-political situation of Pakistan changed. In this changed scenario the
terrorism strongly gripped and swiftly spread in Pakistani society. Its most
visible manifestation was sectarianism in 1990s triggered by religious
extremism. After 9/11, Swat and Waziristan Mission Rah-e-Nijaat, Pakistan once
again became the front line state in war against terror. Pakistan played its
role effectively to curb terrorism and militant groups which increased the acts
of terrorism in Pakistan. This research seeks to find the impact on social life
and culture of Pakistan, the ways to defuse the fear and effects of terrorism
for social well being. Terrorism is one of the social evils not only for
Pakistan but also for all over the world that negatively hit the society as a
socio-economic and political problem.
CHAPTER NO.2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Terrorism
The word Terrorism can best be defined as “The
calculated use of violence (or threat of violence) against civilians in
order
to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature;
this
is done through intimidation or coercion or instilling fear “Or “Terrorism is
the use of threats and violence to frighten or alarm people.”
Terrorism is
a term used to describe violence or
other harmful acts committed (or threatened) against civilians by groups or
persons for political or ideological goals. Most definitions of terrorism include only those acts which
are intended to create fear or “terror”, are perpetrated
for an ideological goal (as opposed to a “madman” attack), and deliberately target “non combatants”. The terms
“terrorism” and “terrorist” (someone who engages in terrorism) carry
a strong negative connotation. These terms are often used as political labels to condemn violence or threat of
violence by certain actors as immoral, indiscriminate,
or unjustified. Those labeled “terrorists” rarely identify themselves
as such, and typically use other
generic terms or terms specific to their situation, such as: separatist, freedom fighter, liberator, revolutionary, vigilante,
militant, paramilitary, guerrilla,
rebel, jihadi or mujahidin,
or any similar meaning word in other languages. In simple words
terrorism is the state of fear created through the act of violence. The common
understanding about the terrorism is that “Terrorism is an organized system of intimidation,
especially for political ends”. Different stakeholders such as terrorist
groups, states and social scientists have arch differences over the definition
of the terrorism depending on the complexity of the circumstances. There is a
great controversy over how to term various freedom movements as a liberation
struggle or terrorists’ movements. An act of certain group is freedom fight for
some people and terrorism for others. This phenomenon makes it difficult to
agree on exact meaning and definition of the terrorism. Every one explains the
terrorism according to his/her certain connotation and vested interests. Some
definitions and versions of terrorism are mentioned below to understand the
phenomenon more profoundly. Terrorism is the public harassment, wave of
agitation, protest against the government, damage to public and private
property, in order to draw the attention of authorities. It can be asserted
that terrorism is absolutely against peaceful political set-up. According to Encyclopedia
of political thought it is a form of political violence, directed at a
government but often involving ordinary citizens, whose aim is to create a
climate of fear in which the of the aims of the terrorist will be granted by
government in question.
Charles Townshend (2002) describes the US and British
version of terrorism in his book entitled “Terrorism a very short Introduction”
as “The terrorism is the calculated use or threat of violence to inculcate
fear, intended to coerce or intimidate governments or societies”. Terrorism is
the language of being noticed (Delillo, 1992).
According to the Dictionary of Social Sciences “Terrorism
refers to the illegitimate use of force by those who oppose existing social,
political or economic arrangements”
In short it can be concluded that the terrorism is an act
of violence performed by any rebellion group or individual to get the certain
viewpoint acknowledged or recognized by the society and government. It is a use
of force to impose the vested interest of the extremist schools of thoughts and
violent groups. Terrorism may be described as a strategy of violence designed
to inspire terror within a particular segment of a given society. Terrorism is
a state of intense fear which threatens the most fundamental human drive the
will to survive intact. When the certain groups or certain school of thought
are not given due socio-political acknowledgement and accommodation they turn
to violence to show their existence. It is the extreme of imposition of the
will by the rulers or dissident groups on the society.
2.2 Types of Terrorism
The phenomenon of the terrorism is very complex on the
whole in all aspects. There is disagreement among the scholars over the types
of the terrorism unlike its definition.
Various attempts have been made to derive the most common
types of terrorism. Some of them are highlighted below:
2.2.1 Suicide
Terrorism
Suicide
terrorism is the readiness to sacrifice one’s life in the process of destroying
or attempting to   destroy a target to
advance their goals. The aim of the psychologically and physically war-trained
terrorist is to die while destroying the enemy target. A suicide terrorist attack (also known
as suicide bombing, homicide bombing or
“kamikaze”) is an attack intended to kill others and inflict
widespread damage, while the attacker intends to die as well in the process.
Modern suicide terrorism is aimed at causing devastating physical damage,
through which it inflicts profound fear and anxiety. Its goal is to
produce a negative psychological effect on an entire population
rather than just on the victims of the actual attack. The large
number of casualties guaranteed in such attacks ensures dramatic and
spectacular media coverage (Schweitzer,
2000
). Methods of suicide terrorism include blowing up
airplanes in mid-air, the use of weapons of mass destruction, and
the use as missiles of ordinary moving objects such as aircraft,
motor cars, boats, wagons, trucks, motorcycles, bicycles, animals, and
young men and women. Over the past two decades acts of suicide terrorism have
been reported in Lebanon, Kuwait, Sri Lanka, Israel, Palestine (West
Bank), India, Panama, Algeria, Pakistan, Argentina, Croatia, Turkey,
Tanzania, Kenya and the USA. Between 1980 and 2002, an estimated 340
suicide–homicide terrorist acts have been reported, with an
estimated number of victims varying from none to 3000 per incident
and number of suicides ranging from 1 to as many as 16 in a single
act of suicide terrorism. There are currently ten religious and
secular groups that are known to have used suicide–homicide acts as
a tactic against their government or against foreign governments.
Some of the terrorist suicide groups are motivated by nationalism,
ethnic nationalism, religion or religious ethnic nationalism (
Schweitzer,
2000
). The literature on suicide terrorism
refers to the beliefs and personality of the leader, the social
structure of the group, and makes references to irrationality,
brainwashing and morbid psychology (
Hazani,
1993
; Lamberg,
1997
; Dein
& Littlewood, 2000
; Colvard,
2002
). The powerful hold that the leader has over the group
members, generally referred to as ‘charisma’, and the leader’s
patience and goal-directedness are the most common factors in all
suicide terrorist groups. Followers and potential suicide terrorists
are indoctrinated to believe in their immortality and assured
ascendance to a heavenly paradise which they are made to believe is physically
present. Suicide terrorists are convinced of their immortality, a
belief that gives them sufficient drive to carry out
the fatal act (
Hazani,
1993
), a complex convergence of political, cultural and
religious ideas, economic hardship and, in some cases, psychological
instability (
Hazani,
1993
). However, it is not clear from the available literature
whether mental illness among suicide terrorists is any higher than
in the general population. It is possible that those who have
demonstrated mental illness were ill before joining the terrorist
organisation (
Lamberg,
1997
). Suicide terrorists who execute acts such as the
attack on the World Trade Center on 11 September 2001 may be people
who are not necessarily violent but who embark on violent actions and are prepared
to die for what they believe to be the greater good of their society
(
Colvard,
2002
). The primary aim of suicide terrorists is not
suicide, because to the terrorist groups suicide is simply a means to an end,
with a motivation that stems from rage and a sense of
self-righteousness. They see themselves as soldiers willing to
sacrifice themselves for a higher purpose and are convinced of an
eternal reward through their action (
Ganor,
2000
). Two main motivations can be identified in the vast
majority of suicide terrorist acts: the first is anger and a sense
of hopelessness; the second is a deep religious belief that a better
life awaits in paradise.
2.2.2
Political terrorism
Political terrorism is a violent criminal behavior designed primarily to
generate fear in
the community, or substantial segment of it, for political purposes.
2.2.3 Non Political terrorism
Non-Political terrorism is a Terrorism that is not aimed at political purposes but
which exhibits “conscious design to create and maintain high degree of fear for
coercive purposes, but
the end is individual or collective gain rather than the achievement of a
political objective.
2.2.4
State Terrorism
State terrorism has
been used to refer to terrorist acts by governmental agents or forces. This
involves the use of state resources employed by a state’s foreign policies,
such as using its military to directly perform acts of terrorism.
2.2.5
Democracy and Domestic Terrorism
The relationship
between domestic terrorism and democracy is very complex. Terrorism is most
common in nations with intermediate political freedom, and is least common in
the most democratic nations. However, one study suggests that suicide terrorism
may be an exception to this general rule. Evidence regarding this particular
method of terrorism reveals that every modern suicide campaign has targeted a
democracy- a state with a considerable degree of political freedom. The study
suggests that concessions awarded to terrorists during the 1980s and 1990s for
suicide attacks increased their frequency. Some examples of
“terrorism” in non-democracies include
ETA in Spain under Francisco Franco, the Shining Path in Peru
under
Alberto Fujimori, the Kurdistan Workers
Party
when Turkey was ruled by military
leaders and the
ANC in South Africa.
Democracies, such as the
United States, Israel, Indonesia, India, and the Philippines, have also
experienced domestic terrorism. While a democratic nation espousing civil
liberties may claim a sense of higher moral ground than other regimes, an act
of terrorism within such a state may cause a perceived dilemma: whether to
maintain its civil liberties and thus risk being perceived as ineffective in
dealing with the problem; or alternatively to restrict its civil liberties and
thus risk delegitimizing its
claim of supporting civil liberties. This
dilemma, some social theorists would conclude, may very well play into the
initial plans of the acting terrorist(s); namely, to delegitimize the state.
2.3 Social
Life
Social life is the combination of various
components: activities, people, and places. While all of those components are
required to define a social life, the nature of each component is
different for every person, and can change for each person, as affected by a
variety of external influences. There are different kinds of things that affect
one’s social life. There are the obvious factors that affect our social lives
over the course of our lifetime, like age – a teenager’s social life of hanging
out at the closest mall accessible by bike is different from a 35-year olds social
life of going to a dinner party at a friend’s house, or even stage in life –
two 30-year-olds will have very different social lives if one is married with
three kids, living out in the suburbs. There are also more immediate things
that can affect one’s social life on a day-to-day basis. Availability of
friends and/or dates, current cash flow, personal schedule, recent positive
restaurant reviews, and perhaps a post on where the celebs are hanging out can
all determine with whom you interact, the nature of activities, how often you socialize,
and where such social activities take place.
2.4 Social
Impact
The word social
Impact
tells us about the Society, In order to understand it first we’ll
discuss the definition of society.
“An extended social group is having a distinctive
cultural and economic organization”
Or
“A formal association of people with similar interests”
As the definition shows, a
society is a grouping of individuals, which is characterized by common
interest
and may have distinctive culture and institutions.
In a society members can be from a different ethnic group. A
“Society” may refer to a particular people such as Pakistani,
or to a broader cultural group, such as Western society. Society can
also be explained as an organized group of people associated together for religious,
benevolent, cultural, scientific, political, patriotic,
or other purposes. Implicit in the meaning of society is that its members share
some mutual concern or Interest, a common objective or common characteristics.
CHAPTER NO.3
                                                              HYPOTHESIS
These were the following hypothesis formulated for our research:
 ·        
H-1   Terrorism is affecting the social life and
culture of Pakistan
·        
H-2   People are bravely facing the current
volatile and adverse situation
CHAPTER NO.4
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The methods selected for the
research were as follows:
·        
Survey
·        
Secondary Analysis
·        
Documents
4.1 Survey
The primary research was carried
out through surveys including questionnaires and interviews. The interviews
were taken from our relatives and different faculty members of our university
including students. Questionnaire was particularly devised for testing the
selected hypothesis by randomly selecting the individuals of different age
groups of Air University Islamabad.
There were eight close ended
questions and one open ended question. They were informed about the key terms
and guided in order to remove any sort of confusion which could lead to
inappropriate results. The total sample size of the questionnaires was 100.Some
of the questionnaires which were not filled properly were discarded, 100
questionnaires were floated out of which 90 were selected. The results are
analyzed based on assessment of individual question given in later section of
this report.
4.2 Secondary Analysis
The secondary data and researches
that were already there helped us study and brain-storm about what we wanted to
get out of this research. This research methodology was mainly used to test our
second hypothesis that people of Pakistan are bravely facing the current volatile
and adverse situation. It helped us a lot to get the desired information and
come up with the effects of terrorism on their social life and culture.
4.3 Documents
Internet, Magazines, Articles & Journals, Newspapers, Library books
of AU were mainly used to collect all the information related to the
effects of terrorism on social life and culture of Pakistan.
CHAPTER
NO.5
RESULTS
ANALYSIS
5.1 Discussion
Nowadays people avoid going to social gathering due to terrorist attacks
which clearly shows that the terrorism has affected the social life of general
population. Nobody can afford to trust in their social circle and personal life
now. They are afraid of being the victims of terrorism. Most of them agreed
that the violent acts of terrorism has badly damaged their mental    growth and created a constant stressful
situation for them and their family. A
situation full of stress, frustration only helps in boosting troubles for them
thus frustrated and stressed out due to everyday terrorist activities. Religion is our core value which however
started being affected by the terrorism. The
question we asked in relation to this was that “Do you feel safe to offer
prayers in the mosque?” 50% preferred to stay neutral; the other major portion
that is 20% strongly disagreed. This shows that people are confused right now,
but yes they did have an impact. The cultural value of Pakistan like
hospitality is changing due to the terrorist actions. Hospitality is again a core value of our nation
which is on its way to down. Like said above, there’s word trust does not lie
anymore anywhere, the good example of hospitality will be even before you say ‘Salam’
to a plumber, you make sure he leaves your place as soon as possible. People
have been psychologically affected due to the current adverse scenario of the
country. Terrorist activities have affected our social relationships with other
countries. 46% of the respondents strongly agreed to it.
We have lost our respect internationally. The good example is that Cricket
champion’s trophy was to be held in Pakistan, instead in South Africa. Each year there is an arts festival held in
Lahore where performers from all over the world come, it was cancelled.
Moreover, we have to hear now ‘do more do more’ slogans which further
frustrates our nation. The open ended question that the measures taken by the
government to prevent terrorist attacks are satisfactory was designed to check
the solidity of the people and their trust on Government. Many valuable
inputs also came in with this question. Respondents said that creating a war
like situation in the country like these huge concrete walls, sand bags, no
they will also build a concrete wall between divider on Islamabad highway, they
won’t help in preventing terrorist attacks. They were of the opinion that the
Government should rather take concrete measures then creating a war like
situation as it is in Iraq. For detailed results (see Appendix-B)
5.2 Analysis
Eighty two percent of H1 is fully
accepted which shows that the
terrorism is effecting the social life and culture of Pakistan. H2 is accepted
through our secondary analysis including different videos proving that the
Pakistanis are bravely facing the current volatile and adverse situation. This
can be authenticated through our study as both the hypotheses have been proved.
CHAPTER
NO.6
EFFECTS OF TERRORISM ON SCOIAL
LIFE AND CULTURE OF PAKISTAN
The end sufferer of the terrorism is the general public.
It is general consensus among the social scientists that human conflict and
corruption cannot be done away from the society. The human conflict results in
the form of violence or terrorism. The repercussions of the terrorism are very
serious for the masses. No doubt, the terrorism not only directly affects economic
development and prosperity but the psycho-social repercussions and heavily damage
human personality and the society. The effects of terrorism may vary from
different persons to different societies. These are some of the following
effects and impacts devise through our research:
·        
First
of all the terrorism has created a sense of fear in the minds of the people.
This fear has further lead to sense of dissatisfaction and terror among the
people.
·        
Due
to terrorism the sense of helplessness has prevailed in the human minds. This
sense of helplessness has further lead to hopelessness among the people
regarding their personal and social well-being.
·        
The
violent acts of terrorism has badly damaged the mental growth of the human
beings and put them in to constant stressful situation. Such attacks
especially, leave harmful and far reaching effects on the minds of the children
when they see dead bodies and horrible scenes of the terrorism on the media.
These days the media gives extra ordinary coverage to the incidents of
terrorism all over the world and people find themselves involved very much
which creates resentment in their minds.
·        
Being
affected by the repercussion of the terrorism the snobbish attitude has been
developed among the masses. It has further damaged human and familial
relationships which ultimately affects the working performance of the
individuals.
·        
Government
has lost their trust and solidity. It has enhanced anger and resentment among
the masses against the government and the state apparatus.
·        
The
people have become the victims of psychological diseases such as anxiety and
frustration, aggression, and deprivation. The social relationships have
severely suffered from great loss in the presence of these psychological
diseases.
·        
Due
to terrorism social splits has widened among the people belonging to the
different schools of thought. This split has become the cause of significant
social division which harms the social fabric and unity negatively.
·        
Due
to the fear of terrorist attacks the people are trying to escape from their
social and professional responsibilities. For example a soldier cannot perform
his duty if he/she has witnessed other companions dying in the deadly terrorist
attacks. Of course, one will join his/her duty but due to constant fear of
losing the life he/she would perform duty in the state of fear.
·        
Terrorism
has promoted social segregation and isolation among the different strata of the
society. It has created distance between the supporters and suffers of the
accused terrorist attacks. That means the terrorism has enhanced the social
disturbance and people feel divided in the society.
·        
Terrorism
has affected the social progress and well-being of the people. Because of the
terrorists activities the businesses and economy of the country has suffered a
great loss. As a result poverty has increased which damages the society very
much.
In short, terrorism has long lasting effects on the individuals,
groups and overall society. The social prosperity and the well-being of the masses
are at the risk and in the situation of constant strain and stress. The human beings
find it difficult to live their life properly and calmly. The violent behavior
develops among the people who lead to socio-economic decline and destroy the
human and social relationships.
CHAPTER NO.7
CONCLUSION
7.1 Implication
Our research project can be very useful
for the Government, Public, Sociologist and Psychologist to study and work on
these effects of terrorism on social life and culture of Pakistan.
7.2 Research Limitations
Due to some limitations we
weren’t able to conduct research up to its full potential level. Security
concerns in Pakistan limited our research to the greater extent. Many of the
respondents were avoiding talking on this topic because of the current adverse
scenario. We were bound to research within the university and couldn’t visit
different people who are actually the sufferers of terrorism to carry out the
research work.
7.3 Future research
Future researchers on this topic
can research on the causes and cures of these effects of terrorism on social
life and culture of Pakistan.
7.4 Recommendations
·        
Government
should establish some rehabilitation centre for the sufferers who have become
the victims of these psychological diseases due to the psycho-social effects of
terrorism.
·        
The effort of the international community in general
and the institutions working against terrorism in special should help individual
states in diagnosing the causes and issues which need to be resolved.
·        
The international community should try to agree upon
the minimum common agenda to curb terrorism.
·        
The clear cut distinction should be established and
maintained to work closely in the fight against terrorism.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
·        
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_impact_theory
·        
Schweitzer,
Y. (2000)
Suicide Terrorism: Development and
Characteristics
.
http://www.ict.org.il/
·        
The British
Journal of Psychiatry
(2003) http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/full/182/6/475
·        
CHARLES, TOWNSHEND (2002). Terrorism a very Short
Introduction. Oxford University Press, Pakistan.
·        
MUHAMMAD, IMTIAZ ZAFAR DR. (2007). Violence Terrorism
and Teaching of Islam. Higher Education Commission, Pakistan.

Syndicated from: Finding Neverland

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jesus Was Palestenian and Why It Matters

Posted on 21 December 2011 by Tea Server

By Jehanzeb Dar

Palestine Because of modern alarmist reactions to the word “Palestine,” many non-Arabs and non-Muslims take offense when it is argued that Jesus was a Palestinian (peace be upon him).

Jesus’ ethnicity, skin color, and culture often accompany this conversation, but few people are willing to acknowledge the fact he was non-European. A simple stroll down the Christmas aisle will show you the dominant depiction of Jesus: a blonde-haired, blue-eyed, white man.

Islamophobia and anti-Arab propaganda have conditioned us to view Palestinians as nothing but heartless suicide bombers, “terrorists,” and “enemies of freedom and democracy.” Perpetual media vilification and demonization of Palestinians, in contrast to the glorification of Israel, obstructs us from seeing serious issues such as the Palestinian refugee crisis, the victims of Israel’s atrocious three-week assault on Gaza during the winter of 2008-2009, the tens of thousands of homeless Palestinians, and many other struggles that are constantly addressed by human rights activists around the world.

To speak from the perspective of the Palestinians, especially in casual non-Arab and non-Muslim settings, generates controversy because of the alignment between Palestinians and violent stereotypes. So, how could Jesus belong to a group of people that we’re taught to dehumanize? 

When I’ve spoken to people about this, I’ve noticed the following responses: “No, Jesus was a Jew,” or “Jesus is not Muslim.” The mistake isn’t a surprise to me, but it certainly is revealing. Being a Palestinian does not mean one is Muslim or vice versa. Prior to the brutal and unjust dispossession of indigenous Palestinians during the creation of the state of Israel, the word “Palestine” was a geographic term applied to Palestinian Muslims, Palestinian Christians, and Palestinian Jews. Although most Palestinians are Muslim today, there is a significant Palestinian Christian minority who are often overlooked, especially by the mainstream Western media.

That dominant narrative not only distorts and misrepresents the Palestinian struggle as a religious conflict between “Muslims and Jews,” but consequentially pushes the lives of Palestinian Christians into “non-existence.” That is, due to the media’s reluctance to report the experiences and stories of Palestinian Christians, it isn’t a surprise when white Americans are astonished by the fact that Palestinian and Arab Christians do, in fact, exist. One could argue that the very existence of Palestinian Christians is threatening, as it disrupts the sweeping and overly-simplistic “Muslim vs. Jew” Zionist narrative. To learn about many Palestinian Christians opposing Israeli military occupation, as well as Jews who oppose the occupation, is to reveal more voices, perspectives, and complexities to a conflict that has been immensely portrayed as one-sided, anti-Palestinian, and anti-Muslim.

Yeshua (Jesus’ real Aramaic name) was born in Bethlehem, a Palestinian city in the West Bank and home to one of the largest Palestinian Christian communities. The Church of the Nativity, one of the oldest churches in the world, marks the birthplace of Jesus and is sacred to both Christians and Muslims. While tourists from the around the world visit the site, they are subject to Israeli checkpoints and roadblocks. The Israeli construction of the West Bank barrier also severely restricts travel for local Palestinians. In April of 2010, Israeli authorities barred Palestinian Christians from entering Jerusalem and visiting the Church of Holy Sepulchre during Easter. Yosef Zabaneh, a Palestinian Christian merchant in Ramallah, said: “The Israeli occupation in Gaza and the West Bank doesn’t distinguish between us, but treats all Palestinians with contempt.”

Zabaneh’s comments allude to the persistent dehumanization of Palestinians, as well as the erasure of Palestinians, both Christians and Muslims. By constantly casting Palestinians as the villains, even the term “Palestine” becomes “evil.” There is refusal to recognize, for example, that the word “Palestine” was used as early as the 5th century BCE by the ancient Greek historian Herodotus. John Bimson, author of “The Compact Handbook of Old Testament Life,” acknowledges the objection to the use of “Palestine”:

The term ‘Palestine’ is derived from the Philistines. In the fifth century BC the Greek historian Herodotus seems to have used the term Palaistine Syria (= Philistine Syria) to refer to the whole region between Phoenicia and the Lebanon mountains in the north and Egypt in the south… Today the name “Palestine” has political overtones which many find objectionable, and for that reason some writers deliberately avoid using it. However, the alternatives are either too clumsy to be used repeatedly or else they are inaccurate when applied to certain periods, so “Palestine” remains a useful term…

Deliberately avoiding the use of the name “Palestine” not only misrepresents history, but also reinforces anti-Palestinian racism as acceptable. When one examines the argument against Jesus being a Palestinian, one detects a remarkable amount of hostility aimed at both Palestinians and Muslims. One cannot help but wonder, is there something threatening about identifying Jesus as a Palestinian? Professor Jack D. Forbes writes about Jesus’ multi-cultural and multi-ethnic environment:

When the Romans came to dominate the area, they used the name Palestine. Thus, when Yehoshu’a [Jesus] was born, he was born a Palestinian as were all of the inhabitants of the region, Jews and non-Jews. He was also a Nazarene (being born in Nazareth) and a Galilean (born in the region of Galilee)… At the time of Yehoshu’a’s birth, Palestine was inhabited by Jews-descendants of Hebrews, Canaanites, and many other Semitic peoples-and also by Phoenicians, Syrians, Greeks, and even Arabs.

Despite these facts, there are those who use the color-blind argument: “It does not matter what Jesus’ ethnicity or skin color was. It does not matter what language he spoke. Jesus is for all people, whether you’re black, white, brown, yellow, etc.” While this is a well-intentioned expression of inclusiveness and universalism, it misses the point.

When we see so many depictions of Jesus as a Euro-American white man, the ethnocentrism and race-bending needs to be called out. In respect to language, for instance, Neil Douglas-Klotz, author of “The Hidden Gospel: Decoding the Spiritual Message of the Aramaic Jesus,” emphasizes the importance of understanding that Jesus spoke Aramaic, not English, and that his words, as well as his worldview, must be understood in light of Middle Eastern language and spirituality. Douglas-Klotz provides an interesting example which reminds me of the rich depth and meaning of Arabic, Urdu, and Farsi words, especially the word for “spirit”:

Whenever a saying of Jesus refers to spirit, we must remember that he would have used an Aramaic or Hebrew word. In both of these languages, the same word stands for spirit, breath, air, and wind. So ‘Holy Spirit’ must also be ‘Holy Breath.’ The duality between spirit and body, which we often take for granted in our Western languages falls away. If Jesus made the famous statement about speaking or sinning against the Holy Spirit (for instance, in Luke 12:10), then somehow the Middle Eastern concept of breath is also involved.
Certainly, no person is superior to another based on culture, language, or skin color, but to ignore the way Jesus’ whiteness has been used to subjugate and discriminate against racial minorities in the West and many other countries is to overlook another important aspect of Jesus’ teachings: Love thy neighbor as thyself. Malcolm X wrote about white supremacists and slave-owners using Christianity to justify their “moral” and “racial superiority” over blacks. In Malcolm’s own words, “The Holy Bible in the White man’s hands and its interpretations of it have been the greatest single ideological weapon for enslaving millions of non-white human beings.” Throughout history, whether it was in Jerusalem, Spain, India, Africa, or in the Americas, white so-called “Christians” cultivated a distorted interpretation of religion that was compatible with their racist, colonialist agenda.

And here we are in the 21st century where Islamophobia (also stemming from racism because the religion of Islam gets racialized) is on the rise; where people calling themselves “Christian” fear to have a black president; where members of the KKK and anti-immigration movements behave as if Jesus were an intolerant white American racist who only spoke English despite being born in the Middle East. It is astonishing how so-called “Christians” like Ann Coulter call Muslims “rag-heads” when in actuality, Jesus himself would fit the profile of a “rag-head,” too. As would Moses, Joseph, Abraham, and the rest of the Prophets (peace be upon them all). As William Rivers Pitt writes: 

The ugly truth which never even occurs to most Americans is that Jesus looked a lot more like an Iraqi, like an Afghani, like a Palestinian, like an Arab, than any of the paintings which grace the walls of American churches from sea to shining sea. This was an uncomfortable fact before September 11. After the attack, it became almost a moral imperative to put as much distance between Americans and people from the Middle East as possible. Now, to suggest that Jesus shared a genealogical heritage and physical similarity to the people sitting in dog cages down in Guantanamo is to dance along the edge of treason.

Without acknowledging Jesus as a native Middle Eastern person — a Palestinian — who spoke Aramaic — a Semitic language that is ancestral to Arabic and Hebrew — the West will continue to view Islam as a “foreign religion.” Hate crimes and discriminatory acts against Muslims, Arabs, and others who are perceived to be Muslim will persist. They will still be treated as “cultural outsiders.” Interesting enough, Christianity and Judaism are never considered “foreign religions,” despite having Middle Eastern origins, like Islam. As Douglas-Klotz insists, affirming Jesus as a native Middle Eastern person “enables Christians to understand that the mind and message” of Jesus arises from “the same earth as have the traditions of their Jewish and Muslim sisters and brothers.”

Jesus would not prefer one race or group of people over another. I believe he would condemn today’s demonization and dehumanization of the Palestinian people, as well as the misrepresentations of him that only fuel ignorance and ethnocentrism. As a Muslim, I believe Jesus was a prophet of God, and if I were to have any say about the Christmas spirit, it would be based on Jesus’ character: humility, compassion, and Love. A love in which all people, regardless of ethnicity, race, culture, religion, gender, and sexual orientation are respected and appreciated.

And in that spirit, I wish you a merry Christmas. Alaha Natarak (Aramaic: God be with you).

The author blogs at Muslim Reverie. He recently wrote a chapter in “Teaching Against Islamophobia” on the demonization of Muslims and Arabs in mainstream American comics.

Syndicated from: Khudi.pk

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Debt Dynamics: Who is Most at Risk?

Posted on 19 December 2011 by Tea Server

Can they stabilize the national debt? It's about growth, stupid!

The debt dynamics equation was in the past of interest only to sovereign credit analysts (such as this blogger) and macro policy wonks.  Now, more people want to know about it.  You can generate such an equation that is elaborate or not, but the gist is the following:  The primary budget surplus, that is, government revenues minus expenditures — not including interest expenses and earnings, must be large enough to cover the excess of the interest cost on the national debt over GDP growth, or else the debt to GDP ratio will rise. 

Primary surplus/GDP > Debt/GDP x (r – g)

…where r is the interest rate on the government debt and g is the rate of growth in GDP; r and g are either both expressed in real (inflation-adjusted) or nominal terms.

Many countries today have primary budget deficits, which means, unless GDP growth is stupendous, that is, in excess of the interest rate, then their debt to GDP is going to rise.

The debt to GDP ratio is a comparative measure of a country’s debt burden.  Think of it this way — you have the amount of debt your government owes, and you divide it by GDP, which is a measure of the size of the economy.  GDP, you may recall, is defined as the sum of the transactions (buying and selling) taking place in an economy in a given year.  Debt is divided by GDP in order to measure the capacity of a country to handle its debt burden, because, after all, you could tax all those transactions in order to pay off the debt. 

What the debt to GDP ratio does not tell you is how high taxes are.  For example, in Sweden tax revenues (broadly defined) represent a whopping 52% of GDP; whereas in the US and Japan, they represent only 32% fo GDP.  If you believe that high taxes squelch growth — and you don’t have to be in the Tea Party to do so — then you would be more optimistic about growth prospects in the US and Japan than in Scandinavia.

Now, it just so happens that Sweden’s GDP growth rate has not been consistently lower than that of the US or Japan in recent years; but you might think that over time, if US and Japanese politicians would stop ruining investor confidence with their antics, then these countries could grow more rapidly than Sweden.  Furthermore, both the US and Japan, again if their politicians would behave better (and here you can blame the Tea Party), have greater scope to raise taxes to improve debt dynamics than does Sweden.  It has been estimated that Japan, if it had a VAT tax as high as Europe’s, would balance its budget overnight.

So, growth matters, taxes matter, the interest rate matters, and the budget deficit matters. So, how do some of the sovereigns we see flash across our computer screens fare on the debt dynamics equation?  

Even though Italy has a high debt to GDP ratio of 120%, analysts and euro-officials trumpet the country’s primary budget surplus as an argument for why the government is solvent.  Well, that surplus has been squeezed down to near zero; and, given rising interest rates resulting from the euro zone crisis, an abysmal GDP growth record and poor growth prospects, the primary surplus would need to be between 1.5% and over 4% of GDP in order to stabilize government debt.  Hence, the market’s concern about Italy.

Spain has a much lower debt to GDP ratio than Italy, at just over 60%; however, its primary balance is in deficit of about 4% of GDP.  Yet Spain only needs its primary balance to be in balance, not surplus, to stabilize its debt to GDP ratio.  But closing that 4% gap is still quite a feat.  The new right of center government, with its majority in the legislature, may just be able to do this.  But the market still has its doubts.

How about France, which the rating agencies still have at AAA but have placed on a negative outlook? Its primary balance is in deficit like Spain’s, but only to the tune of 2.5% of GDP.  Yet its debt burden is higher, at 85% of GDP.  France too needs a primary balance that is in balance, but has less distance to go than Spain.  Still worries about France’s growth prospects — especially its international competitiveness — plague the markets. 

And then there is Germany, which has a sizable government debt burden of close to 80% of GDP, worse than Spain’s. Those pesky German states (lander) love to borrow.  Germany too requires a primary balance to stabilize government debt, but AAA Germany’s primary balance is currently nearly in balance, and its GDP growth track record has been impressive of late.  We’ll see if that continues.

The problem here is growth, stupid!  With high tax burdens, an ideological vice grip on the ECB, poor political leadership at the European and national levels, a lack of structural reforms, and a currency in grave doubt, prospects for GDP growth in the euro zone that would support virtuous debt dynamics are dim.

The UK, which thumbed its nose at greater European oversight of its budget, has a primary deficit of 3.5%, debt to GDP like France’s, and requires balance in order to stabilize government debt.  Yet the UK has the flexibility of its exchange rate and monetary policy to support GDP growth, which euro zone countries lack; however, the UK sends 40% of its exports to the euro zone, so its “splendid isolation” is a mere pipe dream.

Leaving the shores of Europe, we find the US and Japan with woeful primary deficits of 6% and 8% of GDP respectively, suggesting explosive deterioration in sovereign debt dynamics.  US debt to GDP is approaching 95% this year, and Japan’s, get ready for this, is crossing 225% of GDP!  However, given very, very low interest rates in both countries — how long they can get away with this is another story, but most believe they have at least a few years — and possibly better growth prospects than in Europe, both the US and Japan can stabilize government debt with a primary deficit of 1% or so of GDP. 

Japan of course needs much more than debt stabilization; it needs sharp debt reduction.  The other side of the coin for Japan and the US (and to a lesser extent the UK, where tax revenues represent around 40% of GDP, lower than most European countries) is that, should the Tea Party in the US and the factions in the Japanese diet allow some tax increase, then these countries could dramatically improve their debt dynamics.  Europe, on the other hand, can’t really afford to raise taxes, even though some countries are going ahead and doing it anyway.

 

 

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Letter to a Pakistani Diplomat

Posted on 16 December 2011 by Tea Server

By Eqbal Ahmed:

After the publication of a letter in The New York Times (April 10, 1971) signed by me jointly with three other West Pakistani scholars and after subsequent statements of mine opposing the Pakistani military government’s intervention in East Bengal, several Pakistani officials protested my position. They all pointed out that: 1) The army, under General Yahya, is only protecting national integrity against a secessionist movement which would cause the 70 million people in East Pakistan to break away from the 56 million in West Pakistan; 2) The army intervened only after the Bengali nationalists had started killing West Pakistani residents in East Pakistan and the minority Bihari refugees from India; 3) Since the leaders of the Awami League of East Pakistan have pro-Western sympathies and connections, and the Chinese “support” the federal government, anti-imperialist and radical elements should not oppose the military’s action. The following is a reply to one such “friend”.

Dear——

I hope you understand that it was not easy for me and my brother Saghir Ahmad to publish the statement you saw in The New York Times (April 10, 1971). First, I did not have any natural sympathy for the Bangla Desh movement. In fact, I had a definite feeling of antipathy for Sheikh Mujib [East Pakistan’s leader whose party, the Awami League, won a governing majority in the national assembly and 98 percent of Bengali votes]. He impressed me as being a limited man, impetuous and unimaginative. But then I have less regard for his West Pakistani counterparts—the miserable Mr. Bhutto who changes his politics like a lizard his color, or the generals who, bred by colonial Britain and armed by the USA, appear bent on turning the country into a Muslim version of Greece and Spain.

Secondly, as you know, I am originally from Bihar, and most of my people had migrated to East Pakistan. Several of them were killed by Bengali zealots during the period immediately preceding the military’s intervention. Furthermore, I grew up during the Movement for Pakistan, and it is hard not to cherish the idea of national unity. Lastly, as a radical and an internationalist, I do not believe that separatist movements constitute a forward step in the right direction. For these reasons, my inclinations should be to support a policy of maintaining the integrity of Pakistan.

However, as I see the facts surrounding recent developments, I am able to find neither a political and economic nor a moral justification for the current policy of military intervention. I have been examining the facts as closely as it is possible to do, given the censorship of news by the military regime and the resulting imbalances in news reports, some of which necessarily emanate from India.

 

My considered opinion is that:

1) The East Pakistanis had genuine grievances against the federal government, dominated by the military since at least 1957. Not even the most hawkish West Pakistanis deny the gross economic inequities and exploitation suffered by the Bengalis. Politically, twelve years of direct military rule deprived them of even a minor share in the exercise of power.

2) The nearly unanimous electoral support for the Awami League’s demand for provincial autonomy was the result of the neglect of East Pakistan, climaxing in the example of the incredible negligence in the relief of cyclone victims last November. I recognize that the poor in West Pakistan have suffered also. The callousness of our rulers may be undiscriminating. Yet the more disadvantaged people of East Pakistan could only comprehend their condition as caused by regional discrimination.

3) Having failed to arrive at an extra-parliamentary settlement, the military, supported by West Pakistani leaders, intervened on March 25, 1971, to offset the results of Pakistan’s first freely held elections. Perhaps the army had little hope of obtaining the capitulation of Pakistan’s elected representatives. It is now clear that the army used the negotiations between General Yahya and Sheikh Mujib as a cover to prepare for its intervention.

4) There is absolutely no popular base of support for the federal government. Even after four months of terror it has been unable to produce a group of political quislings capable of lending some legitimacy to the army’s occupation.

5) While the military has the power to lord over East Pakistan, the cost of this colonization will be very high for the peoples of both East and West. For the latter it must include increasing economic hardships, militarization of our politics and society, and total denial of civil liberties. The closing of journals like Asad andLail-O-Nahar, the recent jailing without trial in West Pakistan of 800 persons, including leaders like Afzal Bangash, Mukhtar Rana, and G.M. Syed, intellectuals like Abdullah Malik and Sheikh Ayaz, academicians like G.M. Shah, and the recent public floggings of dissenters against the government in Lyalpur and Sialkot are indicative of the shift toward totalitarianism.

Similarly I worry over the statements and editorials which provoke public paranoia by suggesting an Indian-Jewish-American conspiracy in this conflict. This, regardless of the fact that with arms and money the American government is underwriting the murderous mission of the military dictatorship. Above all I am distressed by the promotion of religious fundamentalism and the systematic killing and harassment by the army of our Hindu citizens. I shudder when I think of the repercussions this policy may have for the 80 million Moslems in India.

6) Unless there is an immediate end to military rule in East Pakistan, famine and pestilence as well as periodic massacres by the army will cost millions of lives in the coming months. The intervention has already caused an estimated 250,000 deaths of unarmed civilians. Six million refugees have reached India. Between 60,000 and 100,000 are arriving daily and are facing infection from cholera and the hostility of poor Indians. Millions languish in the interior of East Pakistan, hungry and terrorized, potential statistics in what threatens to become the greatest holocaust in history.

As you know, the balance of survival is delicate in East Pakistan. Minor disruptions often cause major tragedies. Nineteen seventy and 1971 have been particularly hard years. The floods last August and September were the worst of the last decade and destroyed about half a million tons of rice. The cyclone in November, the most severe of the century, destroyed an equal amount of rice and rendered one thousand square miles of rice lands uncultivable for at least one year.

Then the army, in an effort to deny supplies to the Bengali opposition, started confiscating and burning the food reserves. Many displaced or frightened peasants in the villages have not harvested the winter crop. The combined losses, amounting to about 2.5 million tons of rice, must be replaced immediately if mass starvation is to be prevented. The recent survey by the World Bank, as well as the disclosures by Senator Kennedy of suppressed State Department reports, indicate that Western and US officials in East Pakistan have been warning Washington of the “specter of famine.”

 

Others have been more concrete in their predictions. Three months ago, Iain MacDonald, Relief Coordinator for Oxfam and other agencies, warned that 1.5 million persons may face starvation. Recently the Financial Times of Londonestimated that possibly four million would die unless relief and reconstruction were speedily begun. Alan Hart, a BBC reporter, believes it “probable that twenty or more million East Pakistanis will be starving by September or October.”

The dispatch of more supplies for relief is by itself unlikely to avert the impending tragedy. Only a quick restoration of civilian rule can prevent the use of food grains and medicine as military weapons; and only such a restoration can ensure both the distribution of relief and an effective role for international agencies in the administration of such relief.

7) Lastly, I should stress that no genuine restoration of civilian government will be possible until the East Pakistanis have been conceded their right to autonomy or even secession.

 

For these reasons, I believe that the only workable course for West Pakistanis is to insist on immediate and unconditional termination of martial law, the convening of the duly elected national assembly, and a commitment that the majority decisions of that assembly shall be binding on all, even if these decisions dismember Pakistan as a state consisting of East and West. We must reject the army’s absurd claim that it has intervened to protect the nation’s “integrity” from the party that had just won, in Pakistan’s only freely held elections, a governing majority in the national assembly.

In fact, the elected representatives of East Pakistan had insisted only on fulfilling their mandate to achieve autonomy for their province. The proclamation by the East Pakistanis of the independent state of Bangla Desh took place only after the army refused to convene the national assembly and after it had brutally intervened in East Pakistan on March 25, 1971. In his speech of June 28, General Yahya denied the right of the national constituent assembly to draw up a constitution and he harshly attacked all the leaders of the Awami League. This destroyed the possibility of any settlement based on the mandate of the elections.

I know that I shall be condemned for my position. For someone who is facing a serious trial in America, it is not easy to confront one’s own government. Yet it is not possible for me to oppose American crimes in Southeast Asia or Indian occupation of Kashmir while accepting the crimes that my government is committing against the people of East Pakistan. Although I mourn the death of Biharis by Bengali vigilantes, and condemn the irresponsibilities of the Awami League, I am not willing to equate their actions with that of the government and the criminal acts of an organized, professional army.

According to reliable reports, which were not challenged by the government, no more than 10,000 persons were killed or wounded by Bengali nationalists in the riots against the Biharis. At the beginning of August, however, West Pakistan military authorities issued a white paper which claimed that 100,000 people were killed by the Bengali opposition. These and other exaggerated claims in the white paper were obviously intended to justify trials and possible death sentences for opposition leaders. As this letter is being written, the military government has announced that Sheikh Mujib will face a secret military tribunal on August 12, on charges of “waging war” against Pakistan. Since the white paper announced that seventy-nine members of the unconvened national assembly will face criminal charges, Mujib’s trial may foreshadow more secret prosecutions.

I know that the army did not intervene in East Pakistan to stop the killing of non-Bengalis, which went on for three weeks while the generals pretended to seek extra-parliamentary deals with the politicians. Saving civilian lives was not the motive behind the vast repressions that have already cost countless Pakistanis their lives and property and forced millions to flee to India. Unequal bartering of brutalities is not a function of responsible government. The very fact that this military regime seeks justification for its behavior by referring to the excesses of the Awami League and the aroused masses is a measure of the steep decline in the civic standards of our army and civil services. Above all, criminality is not a commercial proposition: one cannot deposit the crimes of one into the account of another.

 

The Chinese rhetoric on this issue is irrelevant. They have offered Pakistan their support only against foreign interference; and indicated their belief that this conflict is an internal matter. Much more alarming is the American government’s decision to continue armaments sales and economic aid to the dictatorship, despite the unanimous opposition of its Western allies, of important men in the Congress, and of the World Bank. This is particularly striking in view of the long-standing loyalty to the West and to the US of Sheikh Mujib and his party.

Washington’s assistance to the West Pakistan junta should be a lesson to those Pakistanis who believed that the US, given a choice between militarists and moderate democrats, would choose the latter. The leaders of the Awami League in East Pakistan failed to understand how important West Pakistan was to the Nixon-Kissinger strategy of building an informal anti-Soviet alliance of dependable clients around the Mediterranean and Indian oceans—from Spain and Portugal, through Greece and Israel, to Iran and Pakistan.

It has been said that General Yahya is now being rewarded by US support for having arranged Mr. Kissinger’s recent mission to China. If this is so, then the Chinese-American detente will have started by being detrimental to the weak and poor in Asia. Whatever the reasons for US policy, however, one effect is clear: Americans have become silent accomplices in crimes against humanity in yet another part of Asia. But their obligations are not as urgent as yours and mine.

I should also stress that the recent developments strengthen the possibility of a war between India and Pakistan. The two countries are more and more becoming pawns in world politics. India and the USSR have now signed a twenty-year friendship pact in which Russia promises to give military assistance to India in the event of war with Pakistan. This treaty cancels the gains that Pakistan had made at the Tashkent conference in 1966, when the Russians promised both to give aid to Pakistan and to be neutral in India-Pakistan relations.

 

I do not know if my position would at all contribute to a humane settlement. Given the fact that our government is neither accountable to the public nor sensitive to the opinion of mankind, our protest may have no effect until this regime has exhausted all its assets and taken the country down the road to moral, political, and economic bankruptcy. However, lack of success does not justify the crime of silence in the face of criminal, arbitrary power.

Source:http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1971/sep/02/letter-to-a-pakistani-diplomat/?pagination=false

Syndicated from: Pak Tea House

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

U.S. Sticking TO Anti-Ballistic Missile Shield In Europe Regardless OF Moscow Objections

Posted on 04 December 2011 by Tea Server



The Obama Administration plans to complete an anti-ballistic missile
shield to protect European allies against Iran "whether Russia likes it
or not," the U.S. envoy to NATO said on Friday.

Moscow's objections to the project, which includes participation by
Romania, Poland, Turkey and Spain, "won't be the driving force in what
we do," Ivo Daalder, the ambassador, told reporters at a breakfast
session.

The U.S. estimate of the Iranian ballistic missile threat has gone up,
not down, over the two years since President Barack Obama opted for a
new, four-phased deployment to protect the United States and NATO
allies, Daalder said.

"It's accelerating," Daalder said of the U.S.-perceived threat of Iran's
ballistic missiles, "and becoming more severe than even we thought two
years ago."

"We're deploying all four phases, in order to deal with that threat,
whether Russia likes it or not," he added. At the same time, he urged
Moscow to cooperate in both to deal with Iran and to see for itself
that, as he put it, the system's capabilities pose its strategic
deterrent force no threat.

READ MORE

Syndicated from: ASIAN DEFENSE

Comments (0)

Register your blog:

Enter your blog address below to become a part of the TeaBreak network.

About TeaBreak:

TeaBreak.pk is a blog aggregator that syndicates pakistani blogs and categorizes them appropriately. Our mission is to give our readers a break from work and let them enjoy their blog time. And we are doing this by bringing all the popular blogs of Pakistan on one platform.