Tag Archive | "PML"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Non Religious Parties Support Restoration of NATO Supply Route

Posted on 29 January 2012 by Tea Server

Pakistan political parties branded without the face of ‘religious’ – doing so would only hinder their fund raising opportunities with Western forces they supposedly despise – like the PTI, MQM, PML N, PPP and ANP have not aligned with the JUI and ASWJ to verbally protest NATO’s plans to restore their supply route. The route [...]

Non Religious Parties Support Restoration of NATO Supply Route is a post from: PakMediaBlog All Rights Reserved.



Syndicated from: PakMediaBlog

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

JI/PTI: Will the fundamentals be compromised over tactical politics?

Posted on 08 January 2012 by Tea Server

Recent wave of Arab spring and success of Justice and Development Party in Turkey have given many lessons to Islamic movements and political parties around the world.

These revolutions and political successes came as a result of patient and hard laboured struggles without compromising on fundamental issues.

Here in Pakistan, after wasting a decade in an un-wanted foreign war, there was a chance of smaller but ideologically focused parties to join hands against the so called war on terror.

The other fundamental issues which got spot light during that time were issues like independent judiciary,corruption, missing persons and breaking the status-quo in Pakistani politics.

Two political forces, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf led by Imran Khan and Jamat e Islami led by Munawwar Hassan, can be expected to bring people together on fundamental issues related to the survival of our country. On one hand eyebrows are being raised over the inclusion of former PML-Q members in PTI and their alleged soft corner for MQM which Imran Khan has rejected.

PTI’s poltical leadership has been denying the impression that they are forming any alliance with forces of status-quo, MQM with its politics of violence or any corrupt leadership. Their point of view on the inclusion of new leadership as expressed by Imran Khan recently is that these people are joining PTI after agreeing with PTI’s agenda and knowing that their assets and credibility will be scruitinized before giving them any party tickets.

Time will tell if PTI sticks to what it claims. Now in another turn of events Jamat e Islami is getting closer with PML-N, a force well-known for being an important part of status-quo along with two other pillars including PPP and establishment.

This development is interesting as according to the news reports, Farid Paracha of Jamat e Islami said,“All the PML-Q has been renamed as PTI. If we have to work with these corrupt people, there is no need to get closer to the PTI.”

This line of argument is interesting from Jamat e Islami’s senior leader. JI is criticizing PTI for including those who are joining the party after accepting PTI’s agenda on USA war on terror, corruption,judiciary etc. Also these people are joining PTI after knowing the fact that their assets and credibility will be scruitinized before giving them party tickets.

On the other hand JI prefers to be partners with a party which is itself an important part of status-quo and has a good history of corrupt power politics (JI’s past statements are also there on this). It was evident from the JI’s recent social media campaign that the people in JI who support PML-N and JUI-F are not happy with PTI’s growing popularity and a possible conflict of interest in the form of some common vote bank or supporter base especially anti-war on terror votebank.

If we talk about fundamentals, PML-N supported operations in Sawat and tribal areas, and played its double role in judiciary movement. Also the possibility of them having a clear stance on corruption is very limited, if we look at their past tenures in federal government.

But still they are eligible for being a partner in the eyes of JI’s senior leader despite former accusations by JI on PML-N for playing the role of a friendly opposition.

So far there are no clear statements on the recent developments between PTI and JI relationship by their top most leaderships. According to news reports, they are expected to meet soon to discuss recent developments in Pakistani politics and way forward with each other.

I hope they will keep fundamental issues like war on terror, corrution, indepndent judiciary, missing persons and independent foreign policy in mind before taking any major decision. This is a make or break time for Pakistani politics as new developments are taking place in neighbouring Afghanistan and a new wave of change in Pakistan is knocking our doors.

Will PTI and JI compromise their fundamental stances over some tactical politics? Their answer may determine the future course of our country and its politics.

Syndicated from: United4justice’s Weblog

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf is by no means PML (Q) or Convention League

Posted on 05 January 2012 by Tea Server

Introduction: Recently there has been much discussion over Imran Khan’s PTI: Is it actually going to be a revolutionary party; or is it going to fail as all the “old faces” are joining it? The points stated by the supporters of the latter view are pretty weak and unjust, and are falsified in this post.
__________________________________________________________

         It was April 1996 when Imran Khan announced the start of a new political party- a party that was started for the delivery of “INSAF” (Justice) to the tyranny-struck Pakistanis, and to make Pakistan truly the land dreamt of by Jinnah and Iqbal.

         Due to Imran Khan’s overwhelming popularity as the world cup winning captain, he was met with enormous responses from public. But the support was not political, so the party met a devastating result in the elections of 1997. It was a small party and such a defeat caused it to shatter. Many leaders left PTI and it seemed that the party would end right there. But it was not so, the courageous captain continued his struggle, kept alive PTI, met many ups and downs in the era of Nawaz Sharif and General Musharraf, got elected as MNA in 2005 elections and resigned in 2007 in support of All Parties Democratic Movement for the restoration of democracy.

         After passing through all that trouble PTI now finally seems to be getting support of the public, and many politicians are rushing into this party. This gathering of politicians has led to a serious question: Is PTI going to serve the same purpose for which it came into existence, or is it just another hallucination that Pakistanis are suffering from? It has been repeated claimed by adversaries of PTI that it is a party being established by ESTABLISHMENT and that a group of same old people can by no means bring a change to Pakistan. Some are even comparing it with PML (Q) and Convention league. To falsify this lame accusation we first need to know about these factions.

         Convention Muslim league was a party built by a man already in power, General Ayub Khan. It is quite evident that people always want to join the ruling side and so they supported General Ayub Khan. These people by no means were loyal to nation. They clearly had the intention to “rule”. As soon as General Ayub stepped down from power, they all left him in a short span of time and now this convention league is just a matter of history.

         PML (Q) had almost the same story. After General Musharraf came to power in 1999, these leaders left their parent party PML (N) and formulated a new political party for enjoying the “RULING RIGHTS” and gave it the name of PML (Q).

         In contrast to Convention league or PML (Q), people are coming in PTI by leaving their ruling parties. As an example, consider Jahangeer Tareen, a former member of PML (Q), who resigned from his national assembly seat and joined PTI. Similarly Shah Mehmood Qureshi and Javaid Hashmi also have resigned from their seats in national assembly to join PTI. This clearly depicts the difference between PTI and PML (Q) or Convention league. 

         Secondly people claim that it is impossible to bring revolution with these old faces. The honest truth about it is that Imran Khan did not go to anyone begging him to join his party. The only man to whom Imran Khan went requesting to join PTI was Javaid Hashmi whose high political stature and patriotism is beyond any doubt. If people want to come in PTI, there is no way a leader would deny it. During the era of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), people became Muslims in hordes but there were also Al-Munafiqoons. Prophet (PBUH) knew it but it was not possible to scrutinize them (I quoted it just an example, as Allah says in Quran to learn from Prophet(PBUH). There is STRICTLY no intention of comparison). The other important point to remember is that Imran Khan has repeatedly said in his interviews that these people are coming in PTI on unconditional basis. This entirely rules out the allegation on Imran Khan that he is recruiting new people into by PTI by giving them initiatives. 

         The third and perhaps the most important thing is that if we trust Imran Khan as the leader than we should trust his selection too. He has been maintaining in his TV interviews that seats shall be allocated on merit basis. He said that a parliamentary board shall be formed that shall give tickets on merit basis and this board shall make sure that the particular person is free from any sort of major corruption charges.

         People have been continuously accusing PTI as a party established by bureaucrats and army men. I simply ask them to name a politician that has no history with the establishment. Nawaz Shareef had been the part of General Zia’s government; Altaf Hussain was established in the era of General Zia and later supported by General Musharraf. Even the most influential of leaders, Z.A Bhutto was a part of General Ayub’s government. 

         This discussion however does not imply that Imran Khan is also a man supported by establishment. Establishment may recruit new people to a party but they cannot force the people to leave their homes. The “TSUNAMIS” of Lahore and Karachi clearly displayed the support from the public. Can establishment gather a charged crowd like these ones?? No, it seems quite absurd. The reason for this baseless propaganda is that when people in the politics see no description for their own shortcomings or the success of someone else, they just blame establishment which seems the simplest excuse.

THE ABSOLUTE VERDICT:
      We as a nation have always been brisk in making decisions and this thing has always gone against us pushing us in a state of anarchy and restlessness. It is time we take a break and give Imran Khan some time. The sudden influx of a lot many people has definitely raised many questions about their integrity but Imran Khan as a leader could not have refused them , he has promised to deliver Pakistan the best available team and has maintained that any corrupt politician shall not be tolerated .His stance is clearly depicting it. In his speech at Karachi jalsa he said that no matter how much you flatter Imran, the final decision shall be on merit. I think it is time we put our trust in Imran and see if he can do what he has promised the nation. I hope he shall not disappoint the nation.


Syndicated from: The Absolute Verdict

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Mehrangate Scandal & ISI reimbursements

Posted on 23 December 2011 by Tea Server




Mehran bank scandal also known as “Mehrangate” was a major political scandal in Pakistan between 1990-1994 in which senior politicians and political parties were found to have been bribed by military and intelligence officers to prevent the re-election and destabilize the government of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP).


Initiated by Chief of Army Staff Mirza Aslam Beg with the alleged support of President Ghulam Ishaq Khan payments of up to 140 million Rupees were done by the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) Chief Asad Durrani and Javed Nasir via the owner of Mehran Bank Yunus Habib. Intelligence funds were deposited in Mehran bank in 1992 propping up what was an insolvent bank as a favour for its owners help in loaning money to the Inter-Services Intelligence in 1990 that was used in the creation of the right wing alliance Islami Jamhoori-Ittehad and bankrolling the campaigns of many opponents of the PPP.
The scandal subsequently broke after the new ISI Chief Lt. Gen Javed Ashraf Qazi decided to transfer the intelligence fund back to state owned banks as per official rules. Mehran Bank was unable to return the money due to its poor financial state and collapsed. It was later discovered that large sums had been siphoned of to 39 fictitious parties.
In 1995, Mehran Bank was amalgamated with the National Bank of Pakistan and in 1996 the NBP had to make full provision for Mehran’s liabilities which resulted in a net loss that year to the bank of Rs 1.260 billion. .

A Supreme Court Petition was lodged by Air Marshal Asghar Khan with the bank transfer details. I wonder as to if Chief Justice of Pakistan could actually take up the case or not?

On April 20, 1994, giving details about the payments made by Mr Habib to generals, politicians and political parties, the then Interior Minister, Naseerullah Babar, told the National Assembly that the main beneficiary of his largesse was former army chief General Mirza Aslam Beg who received Rs140 million.

Key politicians named as recipients of ISI funds included Jam Sadiq Ali (Rs70 million from Habib Bank and Rs150 million from Mehran Bank), Journalist Altaf Hussein Qureshi (Rs.20 million); Yousuf Memon for Ijaz-ul Haq and Javed Hashmi (Rs.50 million); Nawaz Sharif (Rs6 million); former Sindh chief minister Muzaffar Hussain Shah through his secretary (Rs13 million), MQM Haqiqi (Rs5 million), former Sports Minister Ajmal Khan (Rs1.4 million), Jam Mashooq Ali (Rs3.5 million), Liaqat Jatoi (Rs1 million), Dost Mohammad Faizi (Rs1 million), and Jam Haider (Rs 2 million).
Yunus Habib was arrested on April 7, 1994 for misappropriation in the sale proceeds of the Dollar Bearer Certificates. On Dec 14, 1995, Younus Habib was convicted of fraud and embezzlement and given a sentence of 10 years rigorous imprisonment by the Special Court for Offences in Banks in Sindh.

Syndicated from: AKC

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Politics + and my sources!

Posted on 20 December 2011 by Tea Server

As I had predicted, PresidentZardari is back but not in Islamabad but to Karachi. And my sources within thepresidency speaks of a mood to actually take on the judiciary the ISPR’sclearification yesterday proves that military has not actually softened it’sstance on Hussain Haqqani although there’s visible signs that ‘military is okaywith the President.’
In Karachi, Nawaz Sharif is herepossible to outsmart Imran Khan whose much awaited tsunamic-jalsa is all setfor 25th December. I met Nawaz Sharif and had found in him a changeand although he met Atta Ullah Mangal, the Balochistan lion the other daypossibly to give a signal to pressurize GHQ, I think his meeting and actuallytoeing the line of Balochistan was a signal that, PML-N and Nawaz Sharif is ‘not going for a deal’.   Therehad been talks that Mian Sahib had actually met a serving general in Murree andwhen I put the question directly, Mian Sahib who seems not in a mood toreconcile shrugged any chances of a  deal,how his younger brother whose more flexible and an obvious choice by uniformwala’s  seems to be talking to ‘someone’. Why? Becauseof increasing popularity of Imran Khan and PTI – the third force and yes, Ihave an opinion about them. Since the Lawyers Movement which had been adisappointment, one good thing which really came out was how Punjabis for thefirst time had been against army – “this is not Pakistan’s army but a Punjabiarmy’ what the veteran Baloch politician Mengal said yesterday. And since, thePunjabis went against what’s perceived by smaller provinces a Punjabi military andPunjab’s biggest political party had too turned against the military,  the GHQ wanted a pressure group? And whobetter than in the shape of Imran Khan and PTI. And while I disagree withmilitary’s direct support to PTI, military had been using PTI to pressurizePML-N to make a deal with Nawaz Sharif at it’s own terms – that’s how intelligenceagencies work and that’s how the establishment works.
On the other side is thePresident and his PPP hounded by Chief Justice of Pakistan and the SCP which isin no-mood of going down and a reayd for a show down. Would the memogatescandal be the end of PPP led government? No! PPP would get out of it readingCOAS and ISI affidavit and talking to Attorney General of Pakistan who knowsthe game – SCP need’s executive and PPP has the executive on it’s side. WhileMQM and ANP, PPP’s strong allies would side with the PPP!

 While its PPP versus Judiciaryand the pressure is on with a petition against the ISI Chief removal for hisrole in destabilizing democracy with the help of certain ME leaders now pendingat SCP and MQM’s jalsa on 23rd in Multan, Imran Khan’s on 25thin Karachi and Nawaz Sharif preparing one on 30th December and evenMushraff flexing for god knows for how which time in early January, the stageis set for another turbulent year of politics.

I also spoke to Zulfiqar Mirza whose in Dubai now and he’s coming back on 23rd/24th so preparing for another round of Sindh Card and MQM-Haqiqi. Also another news from Karachi is that Afaq Ahmed would be holding an important press conference on 20th December. 

Predictions: PPP would get themajority vote in PPP. 


Syndicated from: AKC

Comments (0)

Having the wrong debate

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Having the wrong debate

Posted on 11 January 2011 by Tea Server

One of the most instructive moments of clarity in the days since the assassination of Salmaan Taseer was provided by Jamaat-e-Islami chief Syed Munawar Hasan, as he spoke to the press in Karachi on Sunday. At a rally at which more than 20,000 Pakistanis gathered in defence of Pakistan Penal [...]

Comments (2)

Register your blog:

Enter your blog address below to become a part of the TeaBreak network.

About TeaBreak:

TeaBreak.pk is a blog aggregator that syndicates pakistani blogs and categorizes them appropriately. Our mission is to give our readers a break from work and let them enjoy their blog time. And we are doing this by bringing all the popular blogs of Pakistan on one platform.