Tag Archive | "noam chomsky"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Profile: Axis of Hope

Posted on 20 January 2012 by Tea Server

Here’s a profile I wrote on Professor Carl Hobert, Founder of Axis of Hope, a non-profit organization on conflict resolution.

It’s all about the Children

          It’s the first class of the semester, and a group of students shuffles across an oval wooden table in SED Ryan’s Library. Hardly familiar with each other’s names, they follow Professor Carl Hobert’s directions for ice-breakers and trust-building exercises. In a rather complicated “circular handshake”, students learn to develop trust and confidence, and begin a practical learning experience. The class is Educating Global Citizens and it is a rather unusual setting. Then again, this is no ordinary professor. His library shelf boasts an eclectic collection of books from Paul Kennedy’s “The Rise and Fall of Great Powers” to the Bible. Intricate mementos and souvenirs from all around the world adorn his office walls; a bright tunic from Ghana particularly stands out. On meeting him, you might notice his unique ties, which feature flags from all over the world, epitomizing his commitment to global citizenship. On inquiry it is revealed that they are from Save the Children, cementing his idea that “it’s all about the children.”
Boston University professor Carl Hobert is founder and executive director of Axis of Hope: Center for International Conflict Management and Prevention, a nonprofit organization committed to peace by targeting children in their “formative years”. Axis of Hope gives students the opportunity to learn essential problem-solving skills and “preventive diplomacy”.

Hobert brings together schools from different socio-economic backgrounds, and students learn to appreciate diversity through unique case studies like “Whose Jerusalem?”
In 2009, students from the Harlem Renaissance School worked with students from Spence, an all-girls school from the wealthier side of town. Hobert says that the way students worked together was absolutely amazing, though he’d been nervous about. Through a collection of ice-breakers and team building exercises, students appreciated each other’s differences and similarities.
One of his old students, David Binin Jastrab, recalls that experience.
“His talent was undeniable there; he was completely in the zone. We started with a cafeteria full of bored, disinterested students and Hobert found a way to identify with them, connect the Jerusalem case study to their lives and got almost all of them to participate earnestly.”
Hobert explains that this is because students learn that the team is more valuable than the individual self.
“The flame starts to grow and glow. But it takes time. I always tell my students to feel the fear and do it anyway” he explains excitedly.
Every Thursday, he visits an Italian Home in Jamaica Plain, in lieu with his ideas on public service and giving back to the community. His international focus is highlighted by conflict resolution trips to Rwanda every summer, where he teaches children important integration skills. Hobert inspires students through his passion and optimistic outlook on life. David Binin Jastrab calls it his natural charisma.
“I joined his class a week or two in and immediately noticed how much he loves a crowd. Like a university president, he charms, enlightens, boosts egos and challenges others as well as anyone.” Jastrab says.
Another student, Isabelle Richardon-Borfiga shares Jastrab’s views and was enamored by his commitment to social change.
“Professor Hobert did not teach us one particular subject but a better understanding of cultures, communication among people and appreciation of conflict resolution for progress” Borfiga says.
Hobert traces his early ideas on conflict resolution to his experiences growing up as a child in Minneapolis. At a time of increasing diversity among public students, the administration began bussing kids from different parts of Minneapolis.
“I got to know Native Americans, African Americans, people who’d come over from Cambodia during the Vietnam War or from Laos…Pockets of different people and it was cool to get to know them.”
Amidst these changes, his friends from the wealthier parts of town began to group together. They were forced to interact with different ethnicities and social backgrounds in school, but they were not comfortable playing with kids who were different from them outside of school. Sometimes fights would break out in the playground and racism would raise its ugly head.  Yet Hobert thought differently as a fifth grader in Kenwood Elementary School.
“I had such a great time with them playing football and hockey and baseball with these friends from other parts of town, particularly from north Minneapolis because this was a predominantly African American part of town. I still think of playing football with Jerome Benton. He still lives out there and he’s a dear friend and a musician for Prince” he says.
He investigated this later in terms of research, particularly the effects of early childhood language acquisition. He discovered that language wasn’t the only barrier. Differences in cultures affected children in their formative years. Conflict resolution was important so “kids can play roles dealing with another conflict but then apply it to their own lives” he says.
“Then the light-bulb goes off: that’s what you’re doing here! It works” Hobert says.
His early childhood experiences sparked an interest in political science, and he went on a Study Abroad program in France as an undergraduate student at Middlebury College. His host family was a well-off Jewish family; he was Protestant. Dinner discussions ranged from Jews and the Second World War, Lutherans and Martin Luther King, Catholics and Catholicism and the North African immigrant experience in France.
“My French mom and dad said those north African people coming from Al-Maghreb were so lucky to have the green light to come to France as cheap labor, as part of Charles de Gaulle’s  open door . They looked upon immigrants as people lucky to be there but for the government to keep them out of Paris now” he says.
His experiences sculptured his personal life, and his importance to family life is painted by pictures of his three daughters that sit neatly on a desk stacked with papers and books. You can see a twinkle in his eyes as he describes his trips with his daughters, filled with experiences he calls “service learning exercises.” Even raising children, his academic streak kicks in as he talks about getting inspired by the Swiss psychologist Piaget and the renowned B.F. Skinner to ensure that his daughters grow up to be the best well-rounded individuals they can be. But this often caused friction with his wife of fifteen years, a Massachusetts sub-urban who wanted to raise the daughters Catholic and in her own parenting style. Her idea was more conventional, “summer the girls in the Cape, bring the kids up in Metro west” Hobert explains.
Hobert was more adventurous; he wanted to “show them the world and prove things to myself.” To him, education theories were not just academic: they were real, and they were personal.
It has been a challenging road. Two of his girls, Leah and Olivia, were adopted from China when they were babies. His youngest, Juliana, is his biological child though. One incident of insensitivity particularly stands out to him. He was at Stop and Shop with his children and can never forget the time a stranger posed a question:
“He looked at me and looked at the two other girls and said “Who are the real parents?” and it’s those sorts of experiences that are tough to deal with”. He explained to his daughters that the person was not well-educated in terms of adoption or what parenthood can be like.
“I buttressed it up by taking them to disadvantaged kids who have been victims of this stuff too.” Hobert chooses his vacation time carefully with very carefully planned service learning exercises, first locally, then in New England and eventually other parts of the country. Last summer he took them to Paris, France and they stayed with his old host family from his college study abroad days.  I took them to Paris and stayed with my family.
Hobert’s personal challenges shaped his compassionate outlook in life. When he was a 15 months old, he developed encephalitis because of a mosquito bite.  The disease that causes inflammation and swelling of the brain affected his later life, and as an adolescent he developed epilepsy. Later, he had a grand mal seizure. Thus, started a cycle of medications, and he was told that this affected his ability to have children. But he got his own personal miracle in June 1999, when a neurologist from Brigham Young Hospital recommended extensive surgery to have the scar tissue removed. It was successful, and this personal transformation heightened his sensitivity to people who were downtrodden, facing medical problems, socio-economic challenges, and even racism.
Inspired by Martin Luther King’s Civil Disobedience – a big reason why he brought the program here to Boston University –Axis of Hope learns from the works of Gandhi, Mother Teresa, Howard Zinn, Elie Weisel and Noam Chomsky.
Hobert says that if students have an advantage in terms of their education, being able to give back, teaches them street smartness and to not only appreciate what they have, but also help others.
“My goal is for kids to experience something international before they graduate from high school.”
As part of this vision, he is submitting a proposal to the Nobel organization to create a Nobel Peace Prize for children at the age of eighteen or under every year.
“That’s how you connect kids and it all goes back to Minneapolis. Children learn on a level playing field which for me was sports. This is a new kind of sport, where you’re working together in a team to confront these issues and conflict.”
A student from Educating Global Citizens, Ian Leatherman thought that working with Hobert was a unique learning environment where international relations, both past and present, could be analyzed on a broad scale by understanding the point of view of the media source giving information.
“The classroom model of role playing and small group analysis shows that peacekeeping takes work but given certain skills, any leader can unite a group to work for good, no matter how diverse that group may be,” Leatherman says.
Leatherman was inspired by the class, and thinks Hobert instills values of hope in every student.
This might be because Hobert leaves students with inspirational quotes.
“Discover your passion and pursue it, Figure out how to make some money off it later, but first pursue your passion” he says, pure conviction in his deep voice.

Syndicated from: Maha Kamal’s Blog

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Would Imran Khan Call Ron Paul to Bat?

Posted on 09 January 2012 by Tea Server

Congressman Ron Paul at the Republican Leadership Conference - 2011

Congressman Ron Paul at the Republican Leadership Conference – 2011

Is it just me, or are seemingly incessant GOP debates the past few months allowing President Obama’s lack of public exposure to seem more and more like solid leadership? The Republican lineups simplistic, square and reactionary focus on “Anti-Obama” rhetoric especially on foreign policy has highlighted a resoundingly hawkish stance on Iran with little attention to our current engagements in Afghanistan and Pakistan. And while it may be expedient amongst a certain political base to try and one-up each other in aggressive foreign policy talk, only Ron Paul challenges the party line on Americas role in the world.

When it comes to Pakistan, compared to Democrats Republicans have a consistent history of preferring to work closely with the military establishment in Islamabad. While there is a level of bipartisanship post 9/11, (case in point is Obama’s continuation of Bush era drone use with little debate), Republicans have through the Cold War and beyond preferred dealing with the military establishment rather than focusing on democratic, or liberal institution building. Which is not necessarily an entirely erroneous policy; part of the rationale is that state building is expensive in blood, toil, time and treasure and rarely feasible. Further, there are an endless number of constraints and uncertainties that profoundly hinder institution, or democratic state building in a place like Pakistan, rendering Republican policies simply pragmatic.

Which brings us to current policy: the bipartisan endorsed “Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act” (S. 1707) enacted in 2009 has yet to bear tangible fruit. Granted the aforementioned that institution building is time exhaustive, the fact remains that Pakistan has deteriorated politically, in the realm of security and economically. And having watched everyone from Gov. Romney, Sen. Santorun, Gov. Perry, Rep. Bachmann and yes even the soft spoken Gov. Huntsman, reiterates hawkish foreign policy while refusing to acknowledge a need for meaningful improvement. In the Republican camp only Rep. Ron Paul’s extreme calls for an isolationist posture offer some semblance of change. And because his prescriptions have yet to be tried, the utility of his ideas have yet to be tested. And now may be a time to consider his stance since they call for exactly what the Pakistani public wants right now.

Referring to our policies to Pakistan as nothing short of “Bombs for Bribes” Ron Paul acknowledges the nobility, yet inherent futility in calling for democratic institutions in places of strategic engagement. He understands that we are already engaged in “130 countries” with “700 bases around the world” and in this speech against the Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act, he bluntly explains:

“the way we treat our fellow countries around the world is we tell them what to do and if they do it, we give them money. If they don’t we bomb them. Under this condition we are doing both. We are currently dropping bombs in Pakistan and innocent people get killed. If you want to promote our good values and democratic processes, you can’t antagonize the people”

Ron Paul Opposes “Bombs and Bribes” for Pakistan – 9/30/2009 - VIDEO

He goes on to suggest dialogue and trade as alternatives to current policy. And although his statement is simplistic and was made in 2009, it highlights Ron Paul’s isolationist, more economically focused prescriptions on foreign policy that seek to reduce our military footprint abroad based on pragmatic constraints, like military and fiscal overstretch. And these calls seem more reasonable than before, especially when it comes to Pakistan and the fact that our aid has yet to yield satisfactory results. So while the Obama administration continues engagement and GOP candidates refuse to acknowledge much concern over current policy to Pakistan, can Ron Paul really be the only alternative available?

Someone once considered completely out of left, excuse me, right field, could be the reminder we need to moderate our engagement with countries of interest. Because what is interesting is that current rhetoric in Pakistan is very much in line with Ron Paul’s ideas. Ron Paul isn’t touting conspiracy theories, nor does he echo far left foreign policy thinkers like Noam Chomsky. Rather, his past statements on our engagement in Pakistan as inadvertently causing chaos” and “violating security and sovereignty are exactly what the average Pakistani seems to feel and hears about in their mainstream TV, and print media. Takeaway for us means, it’s a perception that is realistic; perhaps more so than current policy reflects.

In fact, legendary cricket star turned politician Imran Khan’s recent surge in popularity is in large part due to his highly critical foreign policy rhetoric that vociferously calls for D.C. to adopt a more isolationist stance so Pakistan might reclaim lost autonomy. Imran Khan steadily built support for his party on the continued observation that America’s “War on Terror” has intensified insecurity and his subsequent promises to curtail American involvement is a first step in alleviating Pakistan’s problems.

Imran Khan at Davos – Talks about Winning Hearts & Minds; the War on Terror – VIDEO

He underscores Ron Paul’s sentiment that perceptions urgently matter in a climate where American intervention is increasingly received hostilely. While there may be issues of concern with Ron Paul’s overall foreign policy prescriptions, both politicians insistence on winnings hearts and minds does render the congressman’s ideas in relation to Pakistan worthy of consideration. Imran Khan’s recent ascendency and Governor Paul’s gradually increasing support marks a convergence in shifting to a direction of a less militarized approach to engaging Islamabad. Two men once considered out of the realm of politician viability now increasingly resonate in their respective publics; policymakers ought to take note.

Comments (0)

Register your blog:

Enter your blog address below to become a part of the TeaBreak network.

About TeaBreak:

TeaBreak.pk is a blog aggregator that syndicates pakistani blogs and categorizes them appropriately. Our mission is to give our readers a break from work and let them enjoy their blog time. And we are doing this by bringing all the popular blogs of Pakistan on one platform.