Tag Archive | "Military Intelligence"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Bhutto’s Gallows Revisited

Posted on 15 January 2012 by Tea Server

President Asif Ali Zardari has made a reference to the Supreme Court of Pakistan to revisit the case in which Mr. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was sentenced to death on the charge of ordering the murder of an innocent man Nawab Muhammad Ahmed Khan Kasuri. Interestingly enough the parliament has already prejudiced the case by passing a resolution in its initial session declaring the execution of Mr. Bhutto a ‘judicial murder.’

 In this background, the reference really is a request to determine whether or not the national assembly resolution had any merit or whether it was a contempt of court. The reference also establishes the principle that the judgment of the Supreme Court has greater meaning and weight than a resolution of the national assembly. In order to understand the case it is important to know the background.

Here are some clippings from Nation and Express newspapers and Wikipedia:
Nawab Muhammad Ahmed Khan, Kasuri’s father, was killed in 1974. Kasuri himself was the complainant for the murder case registered against Bhutto, who was eventually hanged in 1979. In April this year, 32 years after Bhutto’s death, President Asif Zardari filed a reference under Article 186 of the Constitution to the Supreme Court to reopen the murder trial.
Bhutto was convicted in a murder case and sentenced to death by the Lahore High Court (LHC) in 1979 during the dictatorship of the then army chief General Ziaul Haq. He was executed on April 4, 1979 by then military dictatorship.

A five-member bench of the LHC, headed by Maulvi Mushtaq Ahmad, had held the Bhutto trial for five months and awarded death sentence to him on March 18, 1978. The Bhutto family had filed an appeal in the Supreme Court. A seven-member bench upheld his death sentence in its February 6, 1979, verdict with a bare 4-to-3 majority. His review petition was also dismissed on March 24, 1979. Bhutto was hanged at the Central Jail, Rawalpindi, on April 4, 1979.

Sheikh Anwarul Haq is a former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan [September 23, 1977 - March 25, 1981]. He is often considered ‘ill-famed’ for giving legitimacy to General Muhammad Zia ul-Haq’s martial law and for upholding the decision of the Lahore High Court which sentenced Zulfikar Ali Bhutto to death for the authorization of the murder of a political opponent. Four Supreme Court judges headed by Chief Justice Anwarul Haq upheld the murder conviction of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. On 25 March 1981, S. Anwarul Haq became the first Justice and only Chief Justice to refuse taking the oath under the military imposed PCO and resigned on conscientious grounds.

Prime Minister Bhutto began facing considerable criticism and increasing unpopularity as his term progressed, the democratic socialists alliance who had previously allied with Bhutto began to diminish as time progresses. Initially targeting leader of the opposition Vali Khan and his opposition National Awami Party (NAP), also a socialist party. Despite the ideological similarity of the two parties, the clash of egos both inside and outside the National Assembly became increasingly fierce, starting with the Federal government’s decision to oust the NAP provincial government in Balochistan Province for alleged secessionist activities and culminating in the banning of the party and arrest of much of its leadership after the death of a close lieutenant of Bhutto’s, Hayat Sherpao, in a bomb blast in the frontier town of Peshawar.

Dissidence also increased within the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), and the murder of a leading dissident Ahmed Raza Kasuri‘s father led to public outrage and intra-party hostility as Bhutto was accused of masterminding the crime. Powerful PPP leaders such as Ghulam Mustafa Khar openly condemned Bhutto and called for protests against his regime. The political crisis in the NWFP (now Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) and Balochistan intensified as civil liberties remained suspended, and an estimated 100,000 troops deployed there were accused of abusing human rights and killing large numbers of civilians.

On January 8, 1977 a large number of opposition political parties grouped to form the Pakistan National Alliance (PNA). Bhutto called fresh elections, and PNA participated fully in those elections. They managed to contest the elections jointly even though there were grave splits on opinions and views within the party. The PNA faced defeat but did not accept the results, alleging that the election was rigged. They proceeded to boycott the provincial elections. Despite this, there was a high voter turnout in the national elections; however, as provincial elections were held amidst low voter turnout and an opposition boycott, the PNA declared the newly-elected Bhutto government as illegitimate.

All the opposition leaders called for the overthrow of Bhutto’s regime. Political and civil disorder intensified, which led to more unrest. Bhutto imposed martial law in major cities including Karachi, Lahore and Hyderabad. However, Mr. Bhutto accepted that there were major irregularities in the election in a number of constituencies and a compromise agreement between Bhutto and opposition to hold fresh election in some constituencies was ultimately reported. This compromise theory was however probably a later day addition as a major PPP armed rally was in the offing.

Zia planned a the Coup d’état carefully as he knew Bhutto had integral intelligence in the Pakistan Armed Forces, and many officers, including Chief of Air Staff General Zulfiqar Ali Khan and Major-General Tajammul Hussain Malik, GOC of 23rd Mountain Division, Major-General Naseerullah Babar, DG of Directorate-General for the Military Intelligence (DGMO) and Vice-Admiral Syed Mohammad Ahsan, were loyal to Bhutto.

To remove this intelligence, Zia secretly contracted with the active duty British SAS army officers to maintain a staff course for the Army personnel while Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Mohammad Shariff quietly removed naval personnel loyal to Bhutto and his government from the Navy’s active duty. Zia ordered Bhutto’s loyal officers to attend a staff and command course and none of the officers were allowed to leave the course until the midnight. Meanwhile, Zia with his close officers, including Admiral Mohammad Shariff, then-Chaiman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, arranged the coup in the evening. On July 5, 1977, before the announcement of any agreement, Bhutto and members of his cabinet were arrested by troops of Military Police under the order of Zia by the evening.

Bhutto’s last personal appearance and utterances in the supreme court were not merely a long defence of his conduct he also made some matters clear. He mentioned the words of “heir” for his son “Mir Murtaza Bhutto”. He made some remark which indicated that he has views similar to a Sunni, though he was Shia albeit a non-practicing one. He also effectively cast doubt on the reliability of star witnesses against him i.e. Masood Mahmood who was a UK-trained lawyer and not merely a police officer and FSF chief. He mentioned repeatedly Lahori Ahmedi connection of Masood Mahmood in his testimony. He repeatedly brought the subject of his maltreatment in the death cell. Bhutto made it abundantly clear, even though indirectly that he wanted either freedom or death, not something in between, and appreciated Khar and his lawyer Yahya Bakhtiar.

While witnessing the dramatic fall of Bhutto, one U.S. diplomat in American Embassy in Islamabad wrote that:

During Bhutto’s five years in Pakistan’s helm, Bhutto had retained an emotional hold on the poor masses who had voted him overwhelmingly in 1970s general elections. At the same time, however, Bhutto had many enemies. The [socialist economics] and nationalization of major private industries during his first two years on office had badly upsets the Business circles… An ill-considered decision to take over the wheat-milling, rice-husking, sugar mills, and cotton-ginning, industries in July of 1976 had angered the small business owners and traders. Both leftists— socialists and communists, intellectuals, students, and trade unionists— felt betrayed by Bhutto’s shift to centre-right wing conservative economics policies and by his growing collaboration with powerful feudal lords, Pakistan’s traditional power brokers. After 1976, Bhutto’s aggressive authoritarian personal style and often high-handed way of dealing with political rivals, dissidents, and opponents had also alienated many….

U.S. Embassy, Pakistan, U.S. commenting of Bhutto’s fate,



                                                                    

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Afaq Ahmed released !

Posted on 18 December 2011 by Tea Server

Finally Afaq Ahmed of MQM-Haqiqihad been released after almost eight years of imprisonment. Somebody who wasgroomed by Military Intelligence (MI) whom former COAS Kakar called, “my lads”to former IG Punjab Sardar who arrested Afaq and Amir in Lahore, Afaq Ahmed andAamir Khan parted with then Mohajir Qaumi Movement of Altaf Hussain and formedwhat was initially known as an “anti-group” who later became, MQM-Haqiqiclaiming to champion Mohajir cause.Throughout the early and midnineties, Haqiqi with it’s fighters supported with Rangers and forces ofestablishment fought pitched battles against Altaf Hussain supported MQM.However post-PML-N and during Mushraff’s period the role turned around andAltaf Hussain of MQM revived it’s close links with the establishment with adeal to imprison Afaq Ahmed, Aamir Khan and close Haqiqi offices.  Afaq Ahmed who had a clout in Landi andKorengi, Karachi ran his organization from jail where 60-80% of his fightingforce has either joined Muthida Qaumi Movement with his number two, Aamir Khanor had been killed in intra-Mohajir fight which had killed more Mohajirs thenany other force.
Later this scribe met Afaq Ahmedon 13 different occasions and interviewed him in detail. Zulfiqar Mirzacontroversial and rouge leader of PPP and former Home Minister, Sindh had beena force which had been involved in securing Afaq’s deal.
What would Afaq Ahmed’s next movebe? Could he join Mirza and rally work as a pressure group on MQM? Or would hejoin Pakistan Tahreek-e-Insaaf (PTI) remembering Imran Khan advocacy of Afaqand meeting with Haqiqi officials? Only time will tell. My advice to MuthidaQaumi Movement (MQM) would be  to actwith restraint and allow anyone and everyone to work freely, opting the usualtactics would lead for another PR disaster. Also for those who are looking too much into the news should remember that Afaq Ahmed is actually released with MQM’s nod. 
Syndicated from: AKC

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Failure in national integration

Posted on 14 December 2011 by Tea Server

By Saad Hafiz:

As another anniversary of the disintegration of Pakistan and the creation of Bangladesh approaches, I am reminded of the eventful period from 1965 to 1971 I spent as a student in the former East Pakistan. 

We arrived in Dacca (Dhaka) just before the September 1965 Indo-Pak War.  Pakistan’s military strategy in 1965 which manifested itself once again in 1971 effectively meant that the defense of East Pakistan lay in a victory or stalemate on the Western front.  This strategy limited the physical impact of the war on East Pakistan as the main concentration of firepower and land and air engagements took place in the West.  However, the West Pakistan centric military strategy employed in the 1965 war was the beginning of a sense of isolation and abandonment in East Pakistan which became more pronounced as events unfolded leading to the eventual secession of East Pakistan.

There are many explanations given for the failure of national building in Pakistan and the genesis of Bangladesh such as the flawed decision by Mr. Jinnah in 1948 to impose Urdu as the only national language which resulted in the language riots and the student martyrs of 1952; the high handedness near colonial attitude of the West Pakistani mostly Punjabi officers serving in the East towards the Bengali population: the inherent sensitivity and nationalism of East Pakistanis and further back in the creation of Pakistan which overlooked the cultural differences between the non-contiguous parts of Pakistan with just religion as the binding force.

My view is that the primary cause of national disintegration was the political alienation of the Bengali population and the economic imbalance between the two provinces which was heavily skewed in favour of West Pakistan.  Bengalis like other national groups in Pakistan, quite rightly demanded an equitable participation in the national decision-making process and in the economic progress that the country had made in the 1960s. 

What the Bengalis got instead was a oppressive central government controlled by the West Pakistani oligarchy, a local leadership made up of stooges like Governor Monem Khan who controlled the mostly bogus electoral process until the “free elections” of 1970 and finally when all else failed a military solution to a political problem.

The Awami League Six-Point program had started to pick up momentum when Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was acquitted in the seemingly fishy and unproven Agartala conspiracy case of 1968.  The local press published the transcripts of the trial which covered in graphic detail the torture by Military Intelligence of Bengali service personnel arrested and tried with Sheikh Mujib. The Agartala coverage contributed to a worsening of the always tenuous relations between Bengali and non-Bengali inhabitants of East Pakistan, which became fraught with suspicion leading to outright hatred.

As we know, the final nail in the coffin of a united Pakistan was the inability of the West Pakistani military leadership allegedly supported by Mr. Bhutto to accept the Awami League victory in the 1970 General Elections. The roles played by the troika comprising General Yahya, Mr. Bhutto and Sheikh Mujib in the 1971 tragedy have been well documented depending on the viewpoint of those writing the history of the period.   

What can be said is that the murder and mayhem that followed the elections which destroyed the lives of many Bengalis and non-Bengalis alike could have been avoided by statesmanship and sagacity sadly lacking in the leadership at the time. I also think some of the political causes of the separation of Pakistan could have been addressed and misgivings removed over time if democracy which involved consensus, parliamentary sovereignty and judicial independence had been allowed to continue uninterrupted.

It seems that a truncated Pakistan has not learnt a lesson from the systemic failure that contributed to its disintegration. Pakistan remains a national security state which continues to look to military adventurers as saviours instead of building and nurturing democratic institutions; the country’s political leadership plays second fiddle to the military; national groups like the Baloch are driven to demand independence; militancy and intolerance thrives and India is still considered a mortal enemy.

Bangladesh has done better in the recent past in sustaining democratic change but the legacy of violence that preceded the creation of the country occasionally rears it head with war crime trials grabbing the headlines forty years after Independence.

Syndicated from: Pak Tea House

Comments (0)

Register your blog:

Enter your blog address below to become a part of the TeaBreak network.

About TeaBreak:

TeaBreak.pk is a blog aggregator that syndicates pakistani blogs and categorizes them appropriately. Our mission is to give our readers a break from work and let them enjoy their blog time. And we are doing this by bringing all the popular blogs of Pakistan on one platform.