Tag Archive | "Liberals"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Lazy Pakistani’s to Remember Salman Today, Forget 364 Days

Posted on 04 January 2012 by Tea Server

In the interest for internet traffic, ATL media buying and appearing cultured, the supposedly literate members of Pakistan have come together to celebrate the man that was – Salman Taseer – and pose rhetoric questions about his sacrifice only to forget the matter for the next 364 days. The tactic will undoubtedly cause readers and [...]

Lazy Pakistani’s to Remember Salman Today, Forget 364 Days is a post from: PakMediaBlog All Rights Reserved.



Syndicated from: PakMediaBlog

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Lazy Liberals: Look Busy, Do Nothing!

Posted on 04 December 2011 by Tea Server

For a while now the liberals keepsaying that they are standing up and waging a great struggle against those whoare constantly attacking them and their beliefs. Around social media and evenmain stream media, the liberals are talking, making a lot of noise with regardsto presenting how they are being attacked and consistently marginalized. Buthere is the problem, apart from shouting and crying foul play, the liberals inPakistan have yet to do anything else. 

In any society there are alwaysliberals, conservatives, libertarians and what not. It is not like we arespecial in some way that only we have the liberals who are the self claimedbattered minority in an increasingly hostile environment. The point of thiswhole discussion is not to bash liberals; it is in fact to call out theliberals to actually do something instead of just making noise. The whole purpose of this piece is to actually get liberals to do something, become politically involved,organize themselves in groups and become a viable opposition to the many rightist groups in Pakistan.

Starting out the most commonphrase liberals keep using is, they are against us and they attack us. Definewho THEY are. I mean if it is the conservatives or the religious right oraliens or people who just do not like you. Who are THEY exactly? I ask thisquestion because in order for any of us to have a proper dialogue, we need toat least know what the two sides are. So an answer to this question would be agreat start. 

Massive JUI-F Rally in Karachi. Over 200,000 people showed up.

Secondly, assuming that thelogical opposite of liberals is conservatives and in terms of Pakistan thatbeing the religious right, what are the liberals actually doing. Because seethe religious parties are organized, and by that I mean, if they call out theirsupporters they can assemble thousands in a matter of hours. In case you wantan example, Jamaat-e-Islami’s annual show of power at Punjab University is asight worth watching. More importantly the discipline they have is exemplary.So in contrast to that, what have the liberals done so far? I mean I realizethat they keep repeating that they are more of an ideological group and the PPPis the only party that even remotely close to their ideas. But thing is,Conservatives are also an ideology, and yet they actually did something andformed various groups and parties who now exert influence regionally if notnationally. So while the liberals might have sympathies towards a politicalparty, they do not have their own party or even an organized group on the scaleof their apparent ideological rivals. 


Thirdly, I know it is awesome andpretty cool to write a million articles and make 100s of movies about howPakistan is super conservative but that kind of does absolutely nothing toactually address the problem. I know the argument to that might be it at leastraises awareness among people, to that I ask you what people? Because thepeople you would like to raise awareness among do not read or see most of yourstuff because it is totally beyond their reach or at times understanding. Sowhile you are doing whatever you are doing, and congratulating each other oversuper brilliant stuff you might have written and your buddies have read, theoverall impact is next to nothing. Also while we are at it, the term liberalshave somehow become synonymous with being elitist or rich or even pro-western.Which to be honest is not right, as liberalism means a lot more. But ourliberals have managed to stay in their comfy cocoon and cement this reputationinstead of taking it head on. 

Falah-e-Insaniyat Trust, a group that is rebranding of Jamaat-ud Dawa
doing relief work in Rural Sindh

Moreover, the point is ourliberals tend to make statements and say touchy feely stuff instead of doingjack shit. Instead of being constantly bashed by everyone else, why haven’t ourliberals actually engaged the other side in a debate? I am sorry but sayingthat they have guns and they are not willing to listen to logic is bullshit.Thing is the sort of logic and language our liberals are going on about is noteven on the same page as most of the country let alone the other side. If youwant to genuinely have a discussion and debate over something logical you willhave to start playing at the same level as your opponents and critics. But thisis apparently something that is beyond the understanding of our liberals,because this would require genuine effort and work, instead they are too lazyfor that. They just enjoy sitting in upscale neighborhoods and cities whileaddressing the issues of the common man. It just can’t work like that. Thebasic minimum that needs to be done is at least speak the same language as youropponents. Also it would kind of help, if our liberals stopped being cry babiesand perpetual victims.


Our liberals cannot continuedoing what they have been so far i.e. making noise and writing about makingthat noise, taking small victories and exaggerating them in to epic wins. Thatcannot continue, because they just cement the public’s perception of them beinga group of over educated pro western elitists. Point is, if the liberals want therespect the religious parties and conservative groups get, well startperforming at the same level. Stop exaggerating small tiny simplistic every daythings in to epic achievements. Because fact is, if you want to go head to headwith any social conservative group in the field of social work, you do notstand a chance. So play to your strengths or better yet start playing ratherthan complaining about your unfulfilled dream of playing. The scale of liberal groups needs to improve while also the sphere in which they function. They cannot keep competing as an ideology against something that is an ideology as well as well oiled machine.
Syndicated from: Seedhi Baat

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

I’m a Paindoo – I adore my mom!

Posted on 03 December 2011 by Tea Server

This rant does not come as a reaction to a nude shoot, or else it would have been there much before that. It’s a reaction to the pseudo-feminist reaction on twitter that the shoot aroused. I had a feeling I should stay off twitter because see I’m no analyst, pseudo-feminist, expert exorcist. Not even a [...]

Syndicated from: The Forbidden Fruit.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

An email on Salman Taseer

Posted on 23 January 2011 by Tea Server

I get a lot fewer emails from readers than I used to, primarily (I think) due to Twitter. But I did get one a couple days ago, and I thought it was worthy of sharing with our other readers. This is from Hamza in Lahore.

I’m a fairly regular reader of your blog, and in the aftermath of the Governor’s assassination my feelings and reaction were somewhat like yours, with the one distinction being that I am presently in Lahore, and therefore have had to more carefully calibrate my frustration, disgust, disappointment, fear and anger, even in front of my parents, who are decidedly less liberal than I am.

The reason I am writing to you is because I wish to relate to you my experience from this morning. I normally sleep in on Saturday mornings, but today I woke up early for something I had wanted to do for weeks. I visited Salman Taseer’s grave in Cavalry Ground. It is an unmarked “kachi” grave insofar as there is no tombstone at its head, or a garish monument of marble. The family may just not have had time to arrange for something more permanent. There is, however, a Pakistani flag hoisted near the head on a ten-foot pole. The wreaths were so numerous there was a pile of them bigger than the grave itself next to the grave. The only ones laid out on the grave itself were from the Chief of Army Staff, some others from high-ranking army personnel (of the sort they lay down ceremoniously at, say, Jinnah’s grave on important occasions) and some unmarked bouquets. The only other people in the graveyard at the time were five policemen who were ostensibly on guard some fifty yards from the grave, and an elderly couple that had just paid their respects at his grave and were leaving as I arrived. If you’re wondering how I found it, the flag and the police guard were pretty obvious location markers; the wreaths marked the actual spot.

I sat there for about ten minutes on a bench close by, coming close to crying. For the most part I thought about the finality of death, and how one of the more influential and powerful men this country knew would lie beneath the dust a few feet from me forever. I thought about how Salman Taseer died for something I believed in. I looked at the flag as it fluttered in the morning breeze, and the next two stunted thoughts did not fully form in my mind till I had left the graveyard and was halfway back home. The first was a plea to my God – I’m not big on organized religion, but I do believe there’s a God up there – to let Salman Taseer into Paradise: anything less in my view would be the biggest travesty within the context of how I view divine justice. The second was a far more discomforting thought: my mind was drawing a blank on what to do in the aftermath of this horrendous event. I consider myself a liberal, my brother considers himself a liberal, and that already is a big departure from our upbringing in a fairly religious – religious, not conservative – family where us brothers are pretty much the only people on this side of the “divide”. My undergraduate education in the US (I’m on leave this year) has been focused on engineering, which seems like such a sack of shit now. What could I possibly do to further the liberal cause in Pakistan with a degree in Electrical Engineering? Teach people digital signal processing?
I can relate to the feeling you will no doubt have experienced over the last several days of sitting helpless halfway round the world, not being on the ground and seeing things transpire as they have here. That is one of the reasons I am writing to you, because I feel it is important for someone like yourself who opines on Pakistan, and is read by overseas Pakistanis, to remember that Salman Taseer’s death is not just a bunch of words on a news website or your own reaction to it. It is a grave with a father in it. It is a grave with a husband, a businessman, a governor, a liberal and a hero in it. And right now, those of us who have been deemed worthy of the same fate have no coherent approach to take on the madmen who would threaten us so. In the words of Twitter user pishipotty, “Fuck this shit. I will be more openly liberal and more vocal against the blasphemy law than I’ve ever been before.” I really wish we could all take those words to heart. I know I certainly have swung farther “left” over the last few weeks, and it would be perhaps interesting for you to see if more liberals have, and whether it could amount to anything.



Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Don’t try to beat the mullahs at their own rhetorical game

Posted on 08 January 2011 by Tea Server

In the aftermath of the Taseer assassination, there has been plenty of reflection and strategizing amongst progressive and liberal minded people about how best to make Pakistan a less crazy country. I must confess that at this juncture, I am personally at a bit of a loss of how best to proceed. But one thing I would note is that trying to take on the right-wing (i.e. the rest of the country) on religious terms is bound to fail.

The logic of the religious-terms lobby is this: Pakistanis are religious people and things like the blasphemy law have strong religious connotations. Ergo, to defeat their worldview, you must engage with them on their terms, and show why things like the blasphemy law are unjust from an Islamic point of view.

This strategy is alluring but doomed to fail, in my view. The point is simple: you can’t beat someone at their own game. You can’t beat Barcelona by trying to out-pass them. You can’t beat Rafa Nadal by trying to out-muscle him from the baseline. And you can’t beat mullahs by citing the Quran or what the Prophet said to some random woman when she was throwing trash on him. Sorry, but it won’t work.

Why would he do it? Why would he try to out-hit me from the baseline? It's madness. Photo: AP

Here’s the thing: any time you cite some verse from the Quran or some story from 1400 years ago to show that you’re right, the mullahs will cite some other verse from the Quran or some other story from 1400 years ago to show that they’re right. I hate to break this to you, but organized religions tend to send mixed messages on everything from rights to violence to duties to whatnot (and yes, fundos, I’ve read the Quran — twice, once with translation). So that’s a bit of a cul de sac in that debate.

Similarly, citing Jinnah and that “you are free to go to your temples” speech is also bound to fail. Jinnah was a lawyer and a politician, and lawyers and politicians make careers out of saying different things at different times to suit different audiences. That’s their job. The fact is, Jinnah stoked communal sentiment when he had to, and made secular-progressive sounds when he had to. So again, I say potato, and you say death to Israel — who’s to say who’s right? More generally, once you’ve ceded the substantive space upon which you will engage in combat, you’ve already lost half the battle.

Personally, I liked an idea that Cafe Pyala mentioned, which is to hoist the mullahs, their allies, and their enablers on their own collective petard. Pursue cases of blasphemy of other religions against them — find like-minded lawyers, strategize on which courts to file complaints in, and go after them the way they go after helpless people. Filing cases against high profile figures (leaders of religious parties, “scholars” and other assorted mullah types) as inciters to violence would also not be a bad idea, but I’m not sure how the legalities of all this would work. It would be great if we could get some lawyers to speak up about the viability of some of these tactics.



Comments (0)

Register your blog:

Enter your blog address below to become a part of the TeaBreak network.

About TeaBreak:

TeaBreak.pk is a blog aggregator that syndicates pakistani blogs and categorizes them appropriately. Our mission is to give our readers a break from work and let them enjoy their blog time. And we are doing this by bringing all the popular blogs of Pakistan on one platform.