Tag Archive | "Daniel Pearl"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Mean Streets of Reporting

Posted on 04 December 2011 by Tea Server

Throughout the four years of covering the war in Bosnia, we male correspondents secretly feared for our female colleagues. We shared all the dangers and challenges except for one — sexual assault. That was a war where bounties were put out for some reporters and rapes camps inflicted horror for local women; as they told us tales of pat downs and searches that got more and more intimate, as anger at the media rose, we feared it was a matter of time.

Well, that time is now. Now we are fully entering into a harrowing and ghastly chapter of the dangers faced by journalists covering today’s conflicts across the Middle East and elsewhere: sexual assault against female journalists.

In one day two weeks ago in Egypt, two more western female journalists were assaulted — one by a mob in the street, the other while in custody in a police station. It has happened before in Egypt earlier this year, both in a high profile case and others not initially reported. It has sadly become an idea that seems to have taken root as a horrifying statement of anger at anyone in the path of some protestors.

Such assaults have happened before, of course, to local and foreign journalists. The difference now is the startling, brutal and brazen increase in the assaults – as well as journalists speaking out to shame their attackers and to bring light on this very real problem.

Where once journalists were considered neutrals, and harmed only when in the wrong place at the wrong time, today we are often targeted for kidnapping, execution and now sexual assault.

More than 30 years as a foreign correspondent offers much eyewitness to this dramatic shift.

In El Salvador in 1982, journalists formed a loosely organized group called the Salvadoran Press Corps Association. One primary purpose was to create a press card that was recognized by both the government and the guerillas to make the job safer. It worked. There were even tee shirts with “Journalist, Don’t Shoot” written on the back in Spanish.

(Of course, that was for FOREIGN journalists. Over the course of the war, 25 local journalists fell victim to the various death squads operating in the country.)

Interestingly, the 1980s wars in Central American were one of the breakout areas for female war correspondents for several reasons: bilingual skills, sheer opportunity and sharp journalism talent. A 1997 paper called The Marginal Majority: Women War Correspondents in the Salvadoran Press Corps Association (SPCA) underscore this historic impact.

In Central American, foreign journalists were the most part safe, unless they dressed like the guerillas they covered and could be mistaken as the enemy by trigger-happy government troops.

Along came the 1991 coup in Haiti and the dangers became more personal to all reporters. Ironically, reporters there feared most of being killed by the anti-coup side – in a macabre way to force the U.S. to intervene. Suddenly, journalists were tools for political use.

After that it accelerated. Daniel Pearl was sought out and murdered, journalists are chosen for kidnappings. The view of journalists being neutral observer, with that modicum of safety, has completely vanished. Now add a rise in sexual assaults.

The Overseas Press Club, of which I serve on the board of governors, along with other groups such as Reporters Without Borders and the Committee to Protect Journalists have recognized this under reported, growing threat. We all must work together to find ways to ensure that our female colleagues are not denied the opportunity to do what they do so well – not from concerned editors who fear they will harmed, nor from those in the streets seeking to do that harm.

A report last summer by CPJ documented this sexual violence either in retaliation for their work or during the course of their reporting. The report includes interviews with 27 local journalists, from top editors to beat reporters, working in regions from the Middle East to South Asia, Africa to the Americas. Five described being brutally raped, while others reported various levels of sexual assault, aggressive physical harassment, and threats of sexual violence. A similar range of experience was reported by 25 international journalists; two reported being raped, five others described serious sexual violation—ranging from violent, sexual touching, to penetration by hands— and 22 said they had been groped multiple times. Most of the reported attacks occurred within the past five years, although a small number of cases date back as far as two decades.

Most interviewed had not previously disclosed their experiences beyond speaking with friends or family. Journalists from all over the world said they largely kept assaults to themselves because of broad cultural stigmas and a lack of faith that authorities would act upon their complaints. But repeatedly they also said they were reluctant to disclose an assault to their editors for fear they would be perceived as vulnerable and be denied future assignments.

Is that the price that must be paid?

This weekend male reporters sharing time while on assignment talked of the insanity of street demonstrations, noting they have long saw Cairo mobs as being particularly dangerous. The chaotic public settings for street demonstration are now prime breeding areas for sexual assaults. Will they silence the messenger?

It seems not. By showing the courage to speak out, the same courage exhibited in their reporting, our colleagues are telling the world they will not stop. Now we must not just hear what has happened but to work to remove the blight.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , ,

Unclassified tribunal hearing of Sheikh Khalid Muhammad

Posted on 01 December 2011 by Tea Server

Unclassified tribunal hearing of Sheikh Khalid Muhammad



Ali K Chishti
 Friday Times http://www.thefridaytimes.com/26112010/page9.shtml
“I was responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center Operation… I share joint responsibility for the training and financing for the assassination of Pakistan’s President Musharraf” 
The Friday Times had been given exclusive insight and access into one of the interrogation Tribunal sessions conducted by the United States regarding the status of Sheikh Khalid Muhammad, Al Qaeda’s number three; and master mind of 9/11 who was caught from Rawalpindi, Pakistan and later moved to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The document is edited to safeguard privacy and security of individuals and gives an in-depth knowledge of psyche of Al Qaeda.
This Tribunal was convened by order of the Director, Combatant Status Review Tribunals under the provisions of his Order of 22 February 2007.
Evidence provided against Sheikh Khalid Mohammad

Paragraph a. On the morning of 11 September 2001, four airliners travelling over the United States were hijacked. The flights hijacked were: American Airlines Flight 11, United Airlines Flight 175, American Airlines Flight 77, and United Airlines Flight 93. At approximately 8:46 am, American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center, resulting in the collapse of the tower at approximately 10:25 a.m. At approximately 9:05 a.m., United Airlines Flight 175 crashed into the South Tower of the World Trade Center, resulting in the collapse of the tower at approximately 9:55 am. At approximately 9:37 am. American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the southwest side of the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia. At approximately 10:03 am, United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in Stoney Creek Township, Pennsylvania. These crashes along with the subsequent damage to the World Trade Center and the Pentagon resulted in the deaths of 2,972 persons in New York, Virginia, and Pennsylvania.

Paragraph b. The Detainee served as the head of the Al Qaeda military committee and was Osama Bin Laden’s principal operative who directed the 11 September 2001 attacks in the United States.
Paragraph d. A computer hard drive seized during the capture of the detainee contained information about the four airplanes hijacked on 11 September 2001 including code names and photographs of 19 individuals. It also had details of pilot license fee for Mohammad Atta.
Paragraph g. A computer hard drive seized during the capture of the detainee contained images of passports and an image of Mohammad Atta.
Paragraph h. A computer hard drive seized during the capture of the detainee contained transcripts of chat sessions belonging to at least one of the 11 September 2001 hijackers.
Paragraph i. The detainee directed an individual to travel to the United States to case targets for a second wave of attacks. The Hard disk had: a) three letters from Osama Bin Laden b) money assistance to families of known Al Qaeda members c) Sheikh Khalid Mohammad wrote “Hojinka plot” the airline bomb which was later found on his Ramzi Yousef’s computer.
Paragraph r. During the capture of the detainee, information used exclusively by Al Qaeda operational managers to communicate with operatives was found.
Paragraph s. The detainee received funds from Kuwaiti-based Islamic extremist groups and delivered the funds to Al Qaeda members.
Paragraph t. The computer hard drive seized during the capture of the detainee also contained a document that summarized operational procedures and training requirements of an Al Qaeda cell.
Paragraph u. The computer hard drive seized during the capture of the detainee contained a list of killed and wounded Al Qaeda martyrs.
President: Sheikh Khalid Muhammad, you may now make an oral statement to the Tribunal, and you have the assistance of your Personal Representative in doing so. Do you wish to make an oral statement to this Tribunal?
SKM: Most of these facts written are related to this hard drive. Other things are very old, even nobody can bring any witnesses for that as you have written here if it will be of value for you for the witness near by you will do it. This computer is not mine, it is of Hawsawi. So I’m saying I need Hawsawi because me and him were both arrested (that) day.
SKM: So, if I (have) been [language] accused then if you want to put facts against me (then tell) also the definition for these facts. If you now read number N what is written (as) the hojinka plot is known (by) many investigations it is not related to any facts against me… And (as) for Ramzi, and the reporter in Jazeera… me and them, there (were) three persons, me and Ramzi and this reporter. So if you (do) not believe me, (do) not believe him, believe my witness. I’m denying the report.
President: People made false statements as a result of this?
Detainee: I told him, I know him yes. You have to be fair with people. There are many people who have never been part of the Taliban (in) Afghanistan. There have been many people arrested after October 2001 attack against Afghanistan who (had) just arrived and they had nothing to do with what had happened.
Khalid Sheikh Muhammad’s accepts following:
Personal representative: I was the Operational Director for Sheikh Osama Bin Laden for the organizing, planning, follow-up, and execution of the 9/11 Operation under the Military Commander, Sheikh Abu Hafs Al-Masri Subhi Abu Sittah.
I was the Military Operational Commander for all foreign operations around the world under the direction of Sheikh Osama Bin Laden and Dr. Ayman Al-Zawahiri.
I was Emir (i.e., commander) of Beit Al Shuhada (i.e., the Martyrs’ House) in the state of Kandahar, Afghanistan, which housed the 9/11 hijackers. There I was responsible for their training and readiness for the execution of the 9/11 Operation. Also, I hereby admit and affirm without duress that I was a responsible participant, principal planner, trainer, financier (via the Military Council Treasury), executor, and/or a personal participant in the following:
I was responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center Operation.
I decapitated with my blessed right hand the head of the American Jew, Daniel Pearl, in the city of Karachi, Pakistan. For those who would like to confirm, there are pictures of me on the Internet holding his head.
I share joint responsibility for the training and financing for the assassination of Pakistan’s President Musharraf.
SKM: Yes. And I want to add some facts for verification. Some operations were carried out before I joined Al Qaeda. I remember Al Qaeda is related to Bojinka Operation, I went to US in 94, 95. Beheading Daniel Pearl is not related to Al Qaeda. It was shared by Pakistani Mujahideen Groups. Daniel Pearl’s mission was in Pakistan to track Richard Reid’s trip to Israel [language]. His mission in Pakistan (was under) Israeli intelligence, Mosad, to take interviews to ask about where he (Reid) was. He (Pearl) had relation with CIA people and Mosad.
For sure, I’m American enemy. Osama bin Laden, he did his best press conference in American media. Mr. John Miller was there when he made declaration of Jihad against America. I consider myself doing a religious (duty), you consider us fundamentalist. We derive (inspiration) from religious leaders… As you consider George Washington as hero, Muslims are considering Osama bin Laden (a hero). I was in the first Jihad against Russia… America supported me in this because I was their ally when I was fighting Russia. But I am fighting America now.
When America invaded Afghanistan, they just arrived in Afghanistan… They never knew what Al Qaeda or Osama bin Laden or Taliban meant [language]. … until now CIA doesn’t have (an) exact definition of who is Taliban, who is Al Qaeda… Taliban never in their life at all before America invaded had intended to do anything against America and they were never with Al Qaeda. They harbour us as Al Qaeda, (this) does not mean we are together. So, this is why I’m asking you to be fair with Afghanis and Pakistanis and many Arabs in Afghanistan. The funny story (is that) the Sunni government sent some spies to assassinate Osama Bin Laden. We arrested them (and) sent them to Afghanistan/Taliban. Taliban put them into prison. Americans came and arrested them as enemy combatant.
Many people be [language] oppressed. Because (in) war, for sure, there will be victims. I’m not happy that three thousand were killed in America. I feel sorry. I don’t like to kill children. Never has Islam, given me green light to kill people. Killing the Christians, Jews, and Muslims, is prohibited. But there are exceptions of rule when you (the US) are killing people in Iraq. You said we have to do it. We don’t like Saddam. But this is the way to deal with Saddam. Same thing you are saying. Same language you use, I use. This is war. If now we were living during the Revolutionary War and George Washington was arrested by Britain… Americans (would have still) considered him a hero… The language of any war in the world is killing. The language of the war is victims. I don’t like to kill people. I feel very sorry that kids were killed in 9/11. What I will do? This is the language. I want to make great an awakening for American to stop (their) foreign policy in our land. And I know it is against American Constitution, against American laws.
We are driving what we (learn from) Koran or Hadith. We are not making up for us laws [language]. When we need Fatwa we have to go back to see what the scholar says… If now Americans know (where) Osama Bin Laden is, they don’t care about his kids and his house. They will just bombard it. They will kill all of them and they did it. They killed the wife of Dr Ayman Zawahiri and his two daughters and his son in one bombardment. They arrested my kids intentionally. They are kids. God knows that many who (have) been arrested, they (have) been unjustly arrested.
War started from Adam when Cain killed Abel. It’s never going to stop… Americans started the Revolutionary War then they started the Mexican, then Spanish War then World War I, World War II. You read the history. This is life. But if who is enemy and who is not? Finally, I finish (my) statement. I’m asking you to be fair with other people.
Note: These original transcripts were published in a declassified format by the US Defence Department. The transcript has been edited slightly for clarity and consistency.
Syndicated from: AKC

Comments (0)

Register your blog:

Enter your blog address below to become a part of the TeaBreak network.

About TeaBreak:

TeaBreak.pk is a blog aggregator that syndicates pakistani blogs and categorizes them appropriately. Our mission is to give our readers a break from work and let them enjoy their blog time. And we are doing this by bringing all the popular blogs of Pakistan on one platform.