Tag Archive | "Chief Justice"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Slapped

Posted on 03 March 2012 by Tea Server



Waheeda Shah may not be dumber than a cow, but then she is not smarter than one either. What politician, in her right mind, would make a public spectacle of herself before the media, even in a place like Tando Muhammad Khan? What was she thinking?

Perhaps there was a mutiny within; a small mind feeling lonely in a large head moving to a smaller place for comfort, and a hand going for a career of its own.

With her apology to the Court binned, she may have to pay. Now that may sound a tad aggressive – it does to her colleagues at PPP.

She lives for others’, and you can tell the others by their swollen faces.

She didn’t mean it’, if only permanent stupidity were as legal a defense as temporary insanity.

Perhaps Waheeda can look at a bright side of this drama. A louse in the locks of politics, doing what lice do unnoticed, she is now in the subject of most discussions. Whatever her vices, hypocrisy is not one of them; she acted as herself, beating the weak into submission. And she may actually get to go to prison – for democracy, as they would call it a few years from now.

The incident took place a day before Pakistan won the Oscars for Saving Faces, a documentary on acid burn victims.

Not surprisingly, the proceedings against Waheeda were taken by the Court suo-moto, ECP not having the spine to protect its own. IG Sindh struggled with the FIR and couldn’t get it right. But he will fix it, now that the CJ is at his case.

So who is to blame for this freak-show?

Waheeda Shah, who represents all that is smug and feudal in Pakistan’s political system?

The Election Commission of Pakistan, that recruits teachers and health workers as polling staff without providing them the support and the protection against the gods of the land?

The Inspector General, whose sense of right and wrong is dictated by who is asking?

The people, who actually elected Waheeda Shah in the same constituency, and will do so again?

The polling officer, who allegedly pardoned her oppressor, perhaps even offered the other cheek, for fear of her life?

Or the society in general, that works solely to break the spirit of people in general and women in specific – telling them that being timid is better than hitting back?

There is an ongoing poll on the facebook page of Borderline Green. The question is, what should be a fair punishment for Waheeda Shah? Should she be pardoned, disqualified from the elections, or slapped right back?

I say slap her back. Since she has slapped, as the Chief Justice said, the whole state, she should receive a hundred and seventy million slaps in return, and then some.

And if she is still elected in the next elections, both she and her constituency deserve each other. That’s democracy for you, with all its redeeming vices.

Syndicated from: Borderline Green

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

22 February, 2012 07:09

Posted on 22 February 2012 by Tea Server

Islamabad Tonight - 21st February 2012 Islamabad Tonight - 21st February 2012 Islamabad Tonight - 21st February 2012Islamabad Tonight - 21st February 2012
http://www.awaztoday.com/playshow/20142/Islamabad-Tonight-21st-February-2012.aspx
http://www.zemtv.com/2012/02/21/islamabad-tonight-dr-shahid-masood-with-nadeem-malik-21st-february-2012-latest/
http://www.friendskorner.com/forum/f247/video-islamabad-tonight-nadeem-malik-21st-february-2012-a-265219/
http://www.pakistanherald.com/Program/Islamabad-Tonight-February-21-2012-Nadeem-Malik-9763

ISLAMABAD TONIGHT

WITH NADEEM MALIK

21-02-2012

TOPIC- INTERIOR MINISTER STATEMENT ON BENAZIR ASSASSINATION

GUESTS- DR SHAHID MASOOD, ASLAM CHODHRY, DR ISRAR SHAH, SHEIKH WAQAS AKRAM

DR SHAHID MASOOD TV ANCHOR said that it is weird that Rehman Malik chose Sindh assembly to give statement on BB assassination instead of national assembly. He said that he was told that Zardari does not like Rehman Malik and Naheed Khan at all. He said that later on Rehman Malik was included in the government by Zardari on a phone call from abroad. He said that Benazir was wearing a bullet proof jacket on the day of her assassination. He said that Zardari called Khalid Shehanshah from America and appointed him as security chief of Benazir Bhutto. He said that Khalid Shehanshah was a very dubious character. He said that some government people later on murdered Khalid Shehanshah inviting him at some place. He said that Benazir Bhutto had wound on the opposite side of her face the bullet was fired. He said that people sitting with Benazir in her car have been cornered and the people who escaped from the murder scene are in the government. He said that it is funny that Zardari is asking to chief justice of Pakistan to investigate Benazir murder.

ASLAM CHODHRY BENAZIR PROTOCOL OFFICER said that Rehman Malik is lying he was not at the spot of assassination of Benazir Bhutto. He said that he told Rehman Malik that Benazir Bhutto has been assassinated. He said that Benazir Bhutto herself registered the FIR of the 18th of October incident. He said that there is Peoples Party government in the Sindh but this case is not resolved.

DR ISRAR SHAH OF PPPP said that there is only one master mind of 17th of July, 18th of October and Benazir assassination incidents. He said that Ajaz Shah is the master mind of Benazir Bhutto assassination and other incidents. He said that the incidents before Benazir assassination were warning for her that if she comes to Pakistan she will be treated this way. He said that the brothers of Benazir Bhutto will take revenge from the leadership of Peoples Party of assassination of their leader. He said that before any body point his finger President should take responsibility of Benazir Bhutto murder.

SHEIKH WAQAS AKRAM said that Zardari has apologized on calling Q league a Qatil (Murderer) league. He said that Rehman Malik statement on Benazir murder has proven them innocent. He said that Rehman Malik statement will raise many new questions and Peoples Party worker will not be satisfied. He said that he is personally not satisfied with the statement of Rehman Malik on Benazir murder.

Filed under: CURRENT AFFAIRS

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

22 February, 2012 07:09

Posted on 22 February 2012 by Tea Server

Islamabad Tonight - 21st February 2012 Islamabad Tonight - 21st February 2012 Islamabad Tonight - 21st February 2012Islamabad Tonight - 21st February 2012
http://www.awaztoday.com/playshow/20142/Islamabad-Tonight-21st-February-2012.aspx
http://www.zemtv.com/2012/02/21/islamabad-tonight-dr-shahid-masood-with-nadeem-malik-21st-february-2012-latest/
http://www.friendskorner.com/forum/f247/video-islamabad-tonight-nadeem-malik-21st-february-2012-a-265219/
http://www.pakistanherald.com/Program/Islamabad-Tonight-February-21-2012-Nadeem-Malik-9763

ISLAMABAD TONIGHT

WITH NADEEM MALIK

21-02-2012

TOPIC- INTERIOR MINISTER STATEMENT ON BENAZIR ASSASSINATION

GUESTS- DR SHAHID MASOOD, ASLAM CHODHRY, DR ISRAR SHAH, SHEIKH WAQAS AKRAM

DR SHAHID MASOOD TV ANCHOR said that it is weird that Rehman Malik chose Sindh assembly to give statement on BB assassination instead of national assembly. He said that he was told that Zardari does not like Rehman Malik and Naheed Khan at all. He said that later on Rehman Malik was included in the government by Zardari on a phone call from abroad. He said that Benazir was wearing a bullet proof jacket on the day of her assassination. He said that Zardari called Khalid Shehanshah from America and appointed him as security chief of Benazir Bhutto. He said that Khalid Shehanshah was a very dubious character. He said that some government people later on murdered Khalid Shehanshah inviting him at some place. He said that Benazir Bhutto had wound on the opposite side of her face the bullet was fired. He said that people sitting with Benazir in her car have been cornered and the people who escaped from the murder scene are in the government. He said that it is funny that Zardari is asking to chief justice of Pakistan to investigate Benazir murder.

ASLAM CHODHRY BENAZIR PROTOCOL OFFICER said that Rehman Malik is lying he was not at the spot of assassination of Benazir Bhutto. He said that he told Rehman Malik that Benazir Bhutto has been assassinated. He said that Benazir Bhutto herself registered the FIR of the 18th of October incident. He said that there is Peoples Party government in the Sindh but this case is not resolved.

DR ISRAR SHAH OF PPPP said that there is only one master mind of 17th of July, 18th of October and Benazir assassination incidents. He said that Ajaz Shah is the master mind of Benazir Bhutto assassination and other incidents. He said that the incidents before Benazir assassination were warning for her that if she comes to Pakistan she will be treated this way. He said that the brothers of Benazir Bhutto will take revenge from the leadership of Peoples Party of assassination of their leader. He said that before any body point his finger President should take responsibility of Benazir Bhutto murder.

SHEIKH WAQAS AKRAM said that Zardari has apologized on calling Q league a Qatil (Murderer) league. He said that Rehman Malik statement on Benazir murder has proven them innocent. He said that Rehman Malik statement will raise many new questions and Peoples Party worker will not be satisfied. He said that he is personally not satisfied with the statement of Rehman Malik on Benazir murder.

Filed under: CURRENT AFFAIRS

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Paul Robeson, Nehru and Jinnah

Posted on 20 February 2012 by Tea Server

By Yasser Latif Hamdani

I first came across Paul Robeson at Rutgers University in the 100th year of his birth. His image was all pervasive for he was possibly the most well known Rutgers College graduate around the world.  The Paul Robeson centre on Busch Campus was dedicated to art, culture and African American fight for equality in America. Robeson was an extraordinary man; an all American Football Player, a concert singer, actor, communist, international citizen. What I later discovered was his intimate connection to the subcontinent through Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India.  The two men had a lot in common including Lady Edwina Mountbatten, that sultry seductress and the wife of the Last Viceroy of India,  who both men had at different times been smitten by.  There was more to it. Nehru the rising star of the non-aligned movement with his own brand of socialism and Paul Robeson the great African American communist were natural allies in a world gone mad. 

In 1958, Nehru came up with the idea of an all India celebration of Paul Robeson. To this end he entrusted M C Chagla, the Chief Justice of Bombay High Court. (Even though Chagla was Jinnah’s most famous associate in law, that is not where the Jinnah connection comes up) to head the celebration committee. This created quite a rift between the US and India which is well documented. America strongly objected what it called the “communist inspired anti-Americanism” of the Indian Government. Later relations between Nehru and Robeson were also estranged when the former dismissed the Communist government of West Bengal.

Now to the Jinnah connection. This review had this very interesting snippet of information that caught my eye:

At the Karachi Club a night later, Ken Mac’s band played a special request by Muhammad Ali Jinnah — Paul Robeson’s ‘The End’, which the Quaid-e-Azam apparently used to hum while visiting his wife’s grave in Mazagaon, Bombay.

I tried then to find the the said song on youtube. It turns out that the song was “the end of perfect day” sung by Paul Robeson.

Paul Robeson sings \”The End of a Perfect Day\”

That Jinnah enjoyed the finer things in life is well known.  His suits, cars, dogs etc are a testament to that. However nothing at all has ever been written about Jinnah’s taste in music.  He was after all an avid theatre goer who enjoyed Shakespeare and Milton in literature.  Yet the caricature of Jinnah that has been created is one of a monosyllabic lawyer engrossed in his law books. This song which he allegedly hummed while visiting his wife’s grave shows an intimate side that has not been revealed before. The lyrics are:

 When you come to the end of a perfect day, 
And you sit alone with your thought, 
While the chimes ring out with a carol gay, 
For the joy that the day has brought, 
Do you think what the end of a perfect day 
Can mean to tired heart, 
When the sun goes down with a flaming ray, 
And the dear hearts have to part? 
Well, this is the end of a perfect day, 
Near the end of a journey, too, 
But it leaves a thought that is big and strong, 
With a wish that is kind and true. 
For mem’ry has painted this perfect day 
With colors that never fade, 
And we find at the end of a perfect day, 
The soul of a friend we’ve made.

Why is it that the wretched state that imposes its ideology on us also tries to stifle any semblance of humanity in our heroes?

Syndicated from: Pak Tea House

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Justice served

Posted on 13 February 2012 by Tea Server

by Saad Hafiz
The Supreme Court (SC) has decided to indict Prime Minister Gilani for contempt of court for his refusal to write a letter to the Swiss authorities asking them to restore corruption cases against President Zardari in that country.  The contempt proceedings against PM Gilani stem from an earlier SC ruling which threw out the controversial National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) in 2009.

The NRO issued by the former President General Musharraf in 2007 granted amnesty to politicians including President Zardari, political workers and bureaucrats who were accused of corruption, embezzlement, money laundering, murder, and terrorism between January 1, 1986, and October 12, 1999, the time between two states of martial law in Pakistan.  The NRO, which erased twenty years worth of corruption charges in one sweep, can be best described as a licence to steal and keep your ill-gotten gain without fear of the law.  If the SC judgment in the contempt case is intended to prod the government to implement the NRO judgment, it can only set a good precedent in the fight against official corruption.

Regardless of political affiliations, the normal reaction to the SC verdict in the PM case should have been focused on the fact that corruption is a very serious matter, which should not be allowed to be brushed under the carpet.  The law must take its course and the PM can seek redress through the appeals process and hurrah to the people as the independent judiciary is alive and well.  One can wholeheartedly agree with Mahatma Gandhi’s quote: “corruption and hypocrisy ought not to be inevitable products of democracy, as they undoubtedly are today.”

As expected, the reaction to the SC verdict is being played along party lines.  Opponents strongly feel that the government has been playing games with the apex court for far too long by not implementing the SC judgments for over two years and that the PM and other ministers deserve to be punished accordingly.  An overly emotional reaction to the Court’s judgment saluted the honorable Judges for upholding the dignity and honor of tSupreme he judiciary and suggested that the judge’s names will be written in golden words in the history books.

Some political commentators and government supporters look at the judgment from different perspective, suggesting that a rickety democratic government presented a soft target for the court.  They see the recent verdict by the SC as a selective judgment, which does not account for other possible contempt cases beyond just official corruption.  These cases include those involving the country’s intelligence agencies involved in disappearance of thousand of persons particularly in Baluchistan.  Human Rights Watch in its 2011 report titled, ‘We can Torture, Kill, or Keep you for Years’, suggests that the SC’s approach to enforced disappearance cases in Pakistan has been to focus on establishing the whereabouts of the missing individuals while being reluctant to press for accountability of security forces and government agencies.

It is probably an understatement to suggest that past SC judgments have not helped the cause of democracy and the rule of law in the country. The following examples come to mind. In 1954, the otherwise brilliant Chief Justice Munir invoked the ‘doctrine of necessity’, validating the dissolution of Pakistan’s first constituent assembly, which many feel set the precedent for future authoritarian intervention the country.  To his credit, Justice Munir also wrote a thought-provoking book, From Jinnah to Zia, arguing that Mr. Jinnah stood for a tolerant and secular state where Muslims and non-Muslims had equal rights.

Later, Chief Justice CJ Anwarul Haq is ‘ill-famed’ for giving gave legitimacy to General Zia’s martial law and for upholding the decision of the Lahore High Court, which sentenced Mr ZA Bhutto to death for conspiring in the murder of a political opponent.  Ironically, unlike incumbent Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry, Justice Anwarul Haq became the first Justice and perhaps only chief justice to refuse taking the oath under the military imposed PCO and resigned on conscientious grounds in 1981.

Beyond the cases of the ‘disappeared’, the security establishment has always escaped accountability for causing great harm to country by fighting and losing needless wars, pursuing flawed national security policies and more recently for their incompetence in the bin Laden and Mehran episodes. It is not unreasonable to hope that the SC will show an even handed approach in dealing with an elected government and other powerful institutions like the armed forces who are in effect a law unto themselves.

Syndicated from: Pak Tea House

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

February 13th, …

Posted on 13 February 2012 by Tea Server

February 13th, 2012. Islamabad. For those of us still following the game of thrones taking place at the center, it appears that Prime Minister Gilani is running out of road. He’s taking a long walk off a short pier. Insert your own cliché here. The debate has overtaken the Prime Minister, the discussion is now focused on what Pakistan must do, post-Gilani. To write the letter or not? Will Senate elections go ahead or not? Will the PPP spin this ungraceful end to a five year term as a victory, will Gilani go back to Multan a living shaheed? Pity the constituency whose only claim to a fruitful five year term is a representative with a knack for getting stabbed in the stomach and making it look like he meant to fall on his sword. Gilani will end up being a sacrifice for an utterly worthless cause – twenty-eight million US dollars that will never be returned to the people of Pakistan. Ever.

The statute of limitations on the Swiss cases are rumored to be anywhere between April and August 2012. The time for reopening old cases is diminishing fast. Yet we insist that the court charade of the last few months was necessary – it’s not about the money, it’s about setting an institutional precedent.

It has been nearly two decades since our President and his late wife stole a mind-bubbling sum of money and squirreled it away into Swiss banks, mansions in Surrey, bank accounts in Dubai and trendy flats in London. Reading the famous 1998 New York Times article reinforces the idea that when politicians from very poor countries amass vast amounts of wealth, they are not likely to let go of it that easily. So forget fantasies of liquidating the Bhutto assets and paying off Pakistan’s international loans. The Pakistani Supreme Court can humiliate the Prime Minister, but it can’t overturn decades of sophisticated white collar crime, much of which takes place outside its judicial territory.

And surely impotence of this intensity is severely humiliating for Chief Justice Chaudhry himself. Having become the defacto arbitrator of every aggrieved party in Pakistan, he suddenly finds himself without any implementation power whatsoever. He is the supreme commander of a court system that is rotten at the foundation, fighting the country’s largest and most public corruption scandal while his own lower court clerks accept petty bribes to tie up litigation for years. His own middle-class biases against the landed elite of the PPP notwithstanding, Chaudhary now faces the task of living up to the dubious honor of being the sole institution in this country deemed impartial and uncorrupt. Which means that if he isn’t seen going after egregious acts of corruption, he will be immediately deemed implicit.

In the face of such impotence, charging and convicting a seated Prime Minister of contempt is a sufficiently bold task to secure Chaudhary’s tripod of potency: judicial independence, of having real power (as opposed to simply striking down the NRO and not being able to do a damn thing to implement it for a full two years), and of being a guardian of the people. Gilani’s removal, whenever it happens, will be sufficiently large to distract from the fact that the PM never stole the twenty-eight million. He never decided to write the letter, or not to write it, for that matter – any more than he decided to become Prime Minister. It will serve to silence those who suggest that post-reinstatement, the CJ has been “bought out” by the PPP, to outcry those who notice that investigations into sugar cartels, NILC, Hajj, Abbotabad,  and Karachi came to naught. It is eye candy for the myopic, a desperate sideshow to distract from a flaming circus of budget malfunctions, energy scams and policy fubars.

But lets not beat ourselves up too much. John Burns pointed out in 1998 that multilateral organizations such as the World Bank regularly support teetering Third World economies “bled dry” by corruption in exchange for weak promises of institutional reform. The last five years have been immensely lucrative for friends of the regime, for those individuals and institutions capable of buying out or bullying Mr. Hundered Percent. At last count, this included everyone from ARY Gold to the Pakistan Army, from AKD to NLC to the men who bring you fantastically overpriced imported cars at huge markups. Zardari did not invent corruption, but he’s a fine example (an institutional precedent, as it were) of just how successful some men and women become in countries with broken democratic systems. Where the Army can quietly wring the neck of anyone attempting to infringe on its economic and political territory. Where an entire Parliament – incumbent, opposition and all – routes all decision-making through the Supreme Court. Where a judge is deeply contemptuous of men who take advantage of their office for personal aggrandizement – and then goes and does exactly the same.

Syndicated from: Erum Haider

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Pakistani Prime Minister Due in Court For Contempt Hearing

Posted on 13 February 2012 by Tea Server

As Reported by CNN

Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani of Pakistan is due to appear Monday before the country’s Supreme Court, which plans to charge him with contempt in relation to a long-running struggle over old corruption cases.

Gilani is locked in a standoff with the Supreme Court justices, who are demanding that he ask the Swiss authorities to revive corruption charges from the previous decade against President Asif Ali Zardari and others.

Gilani has refused the court’s demands and could be jailed for six months if the justices find him in contempt. The court on Friday rejected an appeal by Gilani’s lawyers against the summons to face the contempt charge.

The lawyers have argued that the prime minister has not followed the court’s order because Zardari enjoys immunity in Pakistan and abroad as a president in office.

Gilani said in an interview over the weekend with the satellite news network Al Jazeera that he had an “extremely capable” lawyer and didn’t believe the court would jail him on the contempt charges.

If found guilty of contempt, the prime minister could be forced from office. But his lawyers have said he would keep his position unless electoral officials disqualified him.

Gilani served more than five years in prison between 2001 and 2006 on corruption charges brought by the previous military regime of Gen. Pervez Musharraf — counts he said were also politically motivated.

The corruption cases that the Supreme Court now wants reopened stem from money-laundering charges against Zardari and his late wife, former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. A Swiss court convicted them in absentia in 2003 of laundering millions of dollars.

After Musharraf granted a controversial amnesty in 2007 to Zardari, Bhutto, and thousands of other politicians and bureaucrats, Pakistan asked the Swiss authorities to drop the case. In 2009, the Pakistani Supreme Court ruled the amnesty was unconstitutional and called on the government to take steps to have the cases reopened.

The government has not done so, and the court apparently lost patience. Since Gilani is the head of the government, the court justices view him as responsible.

Filed under: Democracy, Pakistan, Pakistan Army, Pakistanis Tagged: Benazir Bhutto, Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry, Pakistan, Pakistan Supreme Court, Pervez Musharraf, President Asif Ali Zardari, Swiss Court, Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani

Syndicated from: Pakistanis for Peace

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Does Supreme court hate prosperity?

Posted on 11 February 2012 by Tea Server

10th February 2012, a Friday morning. You would think that Chief Justice Iftikar Mohammed Chaudhry would take the day off and enjoy the pleasant weather we are experiencing. You would think wrong! He seeks to destabilize the country and cause tensions in socio-economic circles as well as politics. How you say? By rejecting PM Gilani’s [...]

Does Supreme court hate prosperity? is a post from: PakMediaBlog All Rights Reserved.



Syndicated from: PakMediaBlog

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Appointment of SAC Chief Judge challenged in Supreme Court

Posted on 07 February 2012 by Tea Server

Asim Iqbal Islamabad, February 6: The appointment of former judge of Lahore High Court, Rana Arshad Khan,cas Chief Judge of Supreme Appellate Court Giglgit-Baltistan has been challenged in yhr Supreme Court of Pakistan. The petitioner, Dr Ghulam Abbas, in his constitutional petition has prayed to the apex court to issue stay order agaist the appointment and restrain [...]

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

ISLAMABAD TONIGHT JAN 24, 2012

Posted on 24 January 2012 by Tea Server

ISLAMABAD TONIGHT

Islamabad Tonight – 24th January 2012
Islamabad Tonight – 24th January 2012
Lt.Gen (R) Abdul Qadir Baloch PML-N, Senator Muhammad Ibrahim Khan JI, Senator Tariq Azeem …
Duration: 00:37:13 |
Rating: RatingRatingRatingRatingRating

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_X0NFtCIsEY

NADEEM MALIK
میمو ایک غبارہ تھا جس میں سے ہوا نکل چکی ہے۔ شرجیل میمن
منصور اعجاز کے پاکستان نہ آنے کے پیچھے شاید کوئی کہانی ہے۔ طارق عظیم
ہمارا مسئلہ صرف میمو پر کمشن بنوانا تھا اس کو حل کروانا ہمارا مسئلہ نہیں۔ عبدالقادر بلوچ
حقانی خود تو اپنے خلاف ثبوت نہیں دے گا منصور اعجاز کو پاکستان آنا پڑے گا۔ جسٹس طارق محمود
اس وقت فوج میمو کیس کو اہمیت نہیں دے رہی اور گواہ بھی نہیں آ رہا۔ پروفیسر ابراہیم
… لگتا ہے کہ پردے کے پیچھے کوئی کہانی ہے ورنہ آرمی چیف نے اپنا دستخط کیا ہوا بیان میمو کشن میں داخل کیا تھا۔طارق عظیم
میمو کیس میں حقیقی مدعی فوج ہے جو اب دلچسپی نہیں لے رہی۔ پروفیسر ابراہیم
اس سال اکتوبر یا نومبر میں الیکش ہونے کا امکان ہے۔ پروفیسر ابراہیم
نواز شریف اور عمران خان قبل از وقت الیکشن چاہتے ہیں اس سال الیکشن کا امکان موجود ہے۔ طارق عظیم
صدر اپنی پارٹیوں کے سربراہ ہیں ان کی جگہ بھی عبوری عہدیدار آنے چاہییں۔ پروفیسر ابراہیم
عجیب صورت حال ہے کہ سپریم کورٹ اور الیکشن کمشن آمنے سامنے کھڑے ہیں۔ پروفیسر ابراہیم

Islamabad tonight on aaj news – 24th january 2012
www.zemtv.comمیمو ایک غبارہ تھا جس میں سے ہوا نکل چکی ہے۔ شرجیل میمن منصور اعجاز کے پاکستان نہ آنے کے پیچھے شاید کوئی کہانی ہے۔ طارق عظیم ہمارا مسئلہ صرف میمو پر کمشن بنوانا تھا اس کو حل کروانا ہمارا مسئلہ نہیں۔ عبدالقادر بلوچ حقانی خود تو اپنے خلاف ثبوت نہیں دے گا منصور اعجاز کو پاکستان آنا پڑے گا۔ جسٹس طارق مح…

Share ·

NadeemMalikLive

Islamabad Tonight with Nadeem Malik 24th January 2012 -1

www.friendskorner.com

FriendsKorner129 views

NadeemMalikLive said:

میمو کیس میں حقیقی مدعی فوج ہے جو اب دلچسپی نہیں لے رہی۔ پروفیسر ابراہیم
اس سال اکتوبر یا نومبر میں الیکش ہونے کا امکان ہے۔ پروفیسر ابراہیم
میمو ایک غبارہ تھا جس میں سے ہوا نکل چکی ہے۔ شرجیل میمن
منصور اعجاز کے پاکستان نہ آنے کے پیچھے شاید کوئی کہانی ہے۔ طارق عظیم
ہمارا مسئلہ صرف میمو پر کمش…

remove

Islamabad Tonight with Nadeem Malik 24th January 2012 -2

Islamabad Tonight with Nadeem Malik 24th January 2012 -3

FriendsKorner1215 views

NadeemMalikLive said:

میمو ایک غبارہ تھا جس میں سے ہوا نکل چکی ہے۔ شرجیل میمن
منصور اعجاز کے پاکستان نہ آنے کے پیچھے شاید کوئی کہانی ہے۔ طارق عظیم
ہمارا مسئلہ صرف میمو پر کمشن بنوانا تھا اس کو حل کروانا ہمارا مسئلہ نہیں۔ عبدالقادر بلوچ
حقانی خود تو اپنے خلاف ثبوت نہیں دے گا منصور اعجاز کو پاکستان آنا پڑے گا۔ جسٹس …

Islamabad Tonight – 23rd January 2012

Justice (R) Shaiq Usmani Former Chief Justice of Sindh High Court, Justice (R) Saeed uz Zaman Siddiqui Former Chief Justice of Pakistan and Afaq Ah…

Islamabad tonight – 23rd january 2012 part 1

zemtv.com

hadiqas1786 views

NadeemMalikLive said:

میمو کے پیچھے کون لوگ ہیں تحقیقاتی کمشن کو پتہ لگانا چاہئیے۔ آفاق احمد
منصور اعجاز کے بارے میں حکومتی بیانات ایسے تھے کہ انہوں نے پاکستان نہ آنے کا فیصلہ کیا۔ شائق عثمانی
ہو سکتا ہے کہ منصور اعجاز پاکستان آتے تو ان کے ساتھ سلمان تاثیر والا سلوک کیا جاتا۔شائق عثمانی
منصور اعجاز کا بیان ویڈیو کانف..

remove

32:09Add to Islamabad Tonight – 19th January 2012Chaudhry Aitzaz Ahsan Advocate in an Exclusive Interview With Nadeem Malik in fresh episode of Islamabad Tonight on Aaj Tv. http://www.awaz.tvAwazAaj2,377 views NadeemMalikLive said: میرے خیال میں امکان ہے کہ سینٹ کے الیکشن کے بعد ملک میں عام انتخابات ہو جائیں۔ اعتزاز احسن میں کئیر ٹیکر حکومت میں کسی عہدے کا امیدوار نہیں عبوری حکومت صرف تین ماہ کے لئیے ہوتی ہے۔ مسلم لیگ ن کے اسمبلیوں سے استعفے دینے سے سینٹ کے الیکشن نہیں رک سکتے۔ فیصلہ وزیراعظم کے خلاف بھی ہو گیا تو اپیل کی …

Filed under: CURRENT AFFAIRS

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Predictions for 2012

Posted on 22 January 2012 by Tea Server

Ten Predictions for 2012 :
Pakistan is one of the most complicated places of the world , You can never contemplate when change is in the air and within seconds situations completely change .Whether it be the 1999 coup , Rise of the Chief Justice , Zia’s plane crash , one must wonder that the people of Pakistan has borne it all  but how wrong can we get. With the country looming in major crises, I would love to voice my opinion regarding its future which honestly is not that bright. 
Ten Preditions for 2012:
  1. Gillani will keep his seat : Yes I said it , and how much you hate for me this , but reality won’t change , Gillani will survive the ordeals of the supreme court, unlike musharaff he is a politician and not an administrator. Though how much we wish he would have been an effective administrator but he is an effective politician. Sidelining sovereignty , Aspirations of the common man  , Gillani rides on a strong and contend parliament and will need some miracle to knock him off his perch.
  2. Inflation will rise : Yes I don’t know the stats , but I know our rulers well enough. Inflation will increase despite some good economic conditions emerging. How will you expect the government to lower prices at the expense of their own prado’s etc ( Gillani I still remember that you promised to use a cultux and then later u went for a corolla but you never mentioned land Cruiser ).
  3. Hina Rabbani Khar will succeed where others failed : Khar is talented , there is no doubt about that. Though she lacks the persona of Qureshi and his precedents , she brings the women edge to the table. Her Russia visit will succeed and ties with India will gradually improve. Though a slight problem might be her carelessness to the issue of sovereignty.
  4. Imran the game changer : Now this is the most difficult to predict. Imran’s khan rise to fame has left many in the parliament wondering about their future. Especially after the inclusion of hashmi , Tahreek e Insaf has emerged as a big party . But with only Imran taking the top most position with no family members , one must wonder about the loyality of Qureshi , Swati , Tareen and other . For 2012 , I predict a huge sponsored propaganda against Imran on the media . However, if khan shows patience and some political instincts , he is well placed at the top slot for the PM position next elections .
  5.  Qadri will be freed : As grim as it may look to the liberals , I also don’t want this to happen. Though I am not a huge fan of Taseer and blame him and his party for the current state of affairs , but I have no proof of blasphemy on him and neither will the court. However , some sponsored elements will ensure that Qadri survives . I am not against Qadri , had Qadri killed for the love of Prophet , then he did one of the most noble things (sorry liberals ) but I have no proof against Taseer. Qadri should die for some and shaheed for others . Let Allah decide his fate and same goes for Taseer.
  6. Shahbaz Taseer / Shehrbano Taseer will enter Punjab Politics : PPP is in deep troubles and they need a savior and what better than those teary Shehrbano eyes. And as her tears flows , so will the hearts of the common man in Lahore and some name saving for PPPP atleast.
  7. Musharraf will return to realize he is Mr. Who : As angry as it may make the APML workers , but the reality is whenever Musharraf returns he will be disappointed . Though he was an amazing administrator but his shortcomings on political front especially on Laal Masjid issue,Supreme court and that ridiculous NRO will hurt him deeply. My advice to Mushi , stay there bro J
  8. Misbah- The Man : Yes I said it to all the afridi fanatics , Misbah is and will be the king . This year expect more stability more wins and more ‘TUKS’ from Misbah as he cruises Pakistani Cricket team to the number one spot . Do expect a couple of resignations as well .
  9. One more Pakistani will break the Olevels / Alevels record : I never get the fascination of giving ridiculous amount of Alevels Olevels Papers . Seriously , what does one achieve ,  ultimately a good student and one with 24 – 25 As end up in the same university . Oh sorry I forgot Unless you are Mr. Ali Moeen  Nawazish , you will be paid to represent the youth which despises you for increasing their parents expectation .suddenly 9 As in Olevels isn’t good enough
  10. And Lastly ; this is not a prediction this is a fact that  I know , Fawad Khan , that famous husband in the slowest soap opera of all time will emerge as a major star of Pakistani Industry , By 2013, Pakistan will have its own Shahrukh Khan .
Syndicated from: Pakistan Zindabad

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

CONTEMPT NOTICE TO THE PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN

Posted on 19 January 2012 by Tea Server

The Supreme Court of Pakistan has issued a notice to the PrimeMinister of Pakistan asking him to show-cause as to why contempt of courtproceedings may not be initiated against him. (Contrary to what the media, bothprint and electronic, has been saying this does not amountto an initiation of contempt proceedings and the court cannot sentence the PrimeMinister when he appears in response to the notice) This action has been takenon account of the ire expressed by the court on the 16th of January,when the Attorney General told the court that he had not received anyinstructions from any “of those concerned” as stated by the court in its orderof January 10, 2012. Before dilating further it would be of benefit if therelevant paragraph of the order is quoted in full;
“6.The learned Attorney-General for Pakistan is hereby put on notice to addressarguments before this Court on the next date of hearing, after obtaininginstructions from those concerned, as to why any of the above mentioned optionsmay not be exercised by us in these matters. It goes without saying that anyperson likely to be affected by exercise of the above mentioned options mayappear before this Court on the next date of hearing and address this Court inthe relevant regard so that he may not be able to complain in future that hehad been condemned by this Court unheard. The learned Attorney-General forPakistan is directed to inform all such persons mentioned above about thepassage of this order and also about the next date of hearing.”
It seems to a bit odd that the highest court of the land is warningnot anyone in particular but ‘those concerned’ and goes on to state thatthis warning is being issued so that “he may not be able to complain infuture that he had been condemned by this Court unheard.” Such a warning iscertainly strange if not unheard of.
On the 16th the Attorney General pleaded ‘noinstructions’ and therefore the court exercised Option No. 2 as enunciated inits order of the 10th of January, 2012. It also went on to declarethat the perceived inaction on the part of the Prime Minister in implementingits orders in the NRO case “reflects, at least prima facie, that he may notbe an “honest” person on account of his not being honest to the oath of hisoffice and seemingly he may not be an“ameen” due to his persistent betrayal ofthe trust reposed in him as a person responsible for preserving, protecting anddefending the Constitution and also on account of allowing his personalpolitical interest to influence his official conduct and decisions.”
The Supreme Court is of course hearing the now infamous NationalReconciliation Ordinance (NRO) case which, to the credit of the ‘media cell’set up by the Chief Justice, has hardly been out of the news-headlines sincethe day it was instituted. In this case the Supreme Court has shown efficiency whichhas sadly been lacking in other instances. The importance of the NRO casecannot be overemphasized. However one is amazed to see orders in this case beingreserved and then announced within hours. And then the orders are not shortorders but detailed ones covering several vital legal issues which take days toargue and contain references to cases from the US Supreme Court, Britain andeven India. The cases quoted, only to read, would take more time than the timetaken to announce these orders. One is tempted to ask: Do the judges come tocourt having already made up their minds and are the orders already draftedeven before the hearing begins?
It seems to have escaped many of our ‘expert’ analysts that animportant aspect of the case has not been addressed by the court at all untilnow; a detailed interpretation of Article 248 of the Constitution and itsimpact. This seems to have been acknowledged by the court itself in its orderof the 10th of January 2012 when it puts out Option No. 4 and says;
“OptionNo. 4: Although in the present proceedings nobody has so far raised theissue pertaining to the protections contemplated by Article 248 of theConstitution yet if anybody likely to be affected by exercise of these optionsby this Court wishes to be heard on that question then an opportunity may beafforded to him in that respect before exercise of any of these options.”
Here again, for some strange reason, the court is not addressinganyone in particular but ‘anybody’ who claims protection of Article 248 and islikely to be affected by the decision of the Court even though it is quiteapparent whom the Supreme Court is referring to. It is important to note thatthe Supreme Court itself admits that ‘nobody has so far raised the issuepertaining to the protections contemplated by Article 248”.
Article 248 (2) which needs to be interpreted reads as under;
“248 (2) No criminal proceedings whatsoever shall be instituted orcontinued against the President or a Governor in any court during his term inoffice.”
It is being suggested by some that Article 248 is presumed to havebeen considered by the Court as it has not been said that the Presidentialimmunity extends to the present case. Others are suggesting that if thePresident is seeking immunity he must appear before the Court and claim it assuch and the Court would not by itself grant him immunity.
The fact that the Supreme Court has not addressed the question ofimmunity in detail has been acknowledged by the Court itself as stated above. TheSupreme Court is the final court (at least in this mortal world of ours) and isexpected to decide cases not only in the present time frame but for the futuretoo. It is therefore bound to take into consideration the entire gamut of laweven if a point has not been pleaded before it. There have been occasions wherethe Court has decided a point of law in such a way that it resulted in aninjustice to the litigant before it but to give another interpretation to thelaw would have lead to injustice in the future. In the NRO case the SupremeCourt should have taken up the immunity granted to the President both under ourConstitution and international law and given a decision one way or the other.To say that anyone claiming immunity should come and ask for it only shows thatthe court has made it a matter of its ego even though there is a presumptionthat immunity exists and the onus to prove otherwise is on the one claiming thecontrary. Immunity granted to the President under Article 248 of theConstitution is not unique to our Constitution. Similar provisions exist inmany other countries and there have also been several cases under Internationallaw. The Swiss authorities have made it obvious that they feel that thePresident enjoys immunity under International law also needs also to be takeninto consideration.
One only hopes that saner counsel would prevail and the Supreme Courtwould exercise restraint and not become a vehicle for derailing democracy forwhich the people of Pakistan have shed their blood.
Syndicated from: Thy Hand, Great Anarch!

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Writing letter to Swiss authorities useless: Aitzaz

Posted on 19 January 2012 by Tea Server

ISLAMABAD: Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan on Wednesday said that judiciary has always played an important role in promoting democracy in the country. He said that Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry had stated that there would be no more martial laws in the country. He said that President Asif Ali Zardari enjoys complete immunity in Pakistan as [...]

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

India-Pakistan prisoners – fishermen, POWs, and more

Posted on 18 January 2012 by Tea Server

Indian fishermen released from Pakistani prisons, waiting to go back

Below, my article on the India-Pakistan prisoners issue published in Aman ki Asha on Jan 11, 2012, followed by a correction from Sen. Iqbal Haider and further clarification from B.M. Kutty. Also please do read Shivam Vij’s thought-provoking and thorough report ‘Why is Gopal Das free and not Dr Chishty?‘, published in Aman ki Asha, and Anahita Mukherji’s report in The Sunday Times of India about how the Indian prisoners were treated in Pakistan (surprisingly well) - Warm memories of time in Pak jail.

Looking a New Year gift horse in the mouth

Pakistan’s release of 183 Indian prisoners on Jan 7, 2012 is a welcome step but it also highlights the ongoing issues faced by cross-border prisoners

By Beena Sarwar

On January 8, 2012, 183 Indians crossed the Wagah border from Lahore, bundled up against the bitter cold, many in shawls gifted to them in Pakistan, eager to return home after being released from Pakistani prisons.

Much hard work, persistence and the humanitarian view taken by the Lahore High Court lie behind their release, termed “a New Year gift” from Pakistan to India.

The story of this particular prisoner repatriation started in October 2011, when advocate Awais Sheikh filed a writ petition before the Lahore High Court seeking the release of two Indians, Satinder Paul and Karale Bhanudas, who remained in Pakistani prisons despite having completed their sentence.

On the Lahore High Court’s order to provide details on foreign nationals held in Pakistani prisons, Superintendent Jail submitted a list of 74 foreign nationals in prison, including 33 Indians, who had completed their terms of imprisonment.

Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court Ijaz Ahmed Choudry in his order of Nov 14, 2011, directed the release the two prisoners on whose case the petition was based, as well as all foreign prisoners who had completed their terms.

Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign affairs cleared six Indian civilian prisoners for release. However, two of them, Sakhi Muhammad and Bhavesh Kanti Parmar, were not released for “unknown reasons”, says Awais Sheikh.

Released Indian prisoners waiting to complete formalities at Wagah. Photo: TOI

On Jan 7, 2012, Pakistan released 183 Indian prisoners, including Satinder Paul Singh, Sanjeet Kumar, Nasim and Sama Yousaf, and 179 Indian fishermen. They were brought to Wagah border on Jan 8th morning. The First Secretary of Indian High Commission along with three other ICH officers and an officer of Pakistan’s Interior Ministry, Islamabad, were also present.

It took them five hours at Wagah to complete the legal formalities at Customs, during which time advocate Awais Sheikh also remained with them. They finally crossed the border at 6.00 p.m.

“It was an unforgettable scene,” says Sheikh. “I bid them a hearty farewell with my best wishes. My apologies to them all for being kept in jails even after the completion of awarded sentence. I wish that sanity would prevail and I pray that my voice reaches the governments of both countries”.

Justice delayed

There are still 276 Indian fishermen in Pakistani jails. “Of these, 83 have already served their sentence but cannot be released because Indian authorities have not confirmed their nationality,” explains Justice Zahid. Foreign prisoners can only be freed after respective embassies confirm their identity.

This is also the case in India, which currently has 440 Pakistani fishermen in custody, according to former Pakistan law minister Iqbal Haider. He says that the nationalities of 285 of these prisoners have been determined, but “no assistance can be provided to the remaining 164 until their citizenship is established.”

Officials at India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) say that India and Pakistan don’t want to detain fishermen from the other country. “Once they cross the border, the legal process begins. The process of verifying nationalities involves visiting a fisherman’s village to confirm his identity. Often the addresses given are incomplete or very remote. It may take a long time to get there,” said an MEA official.

But rights activists say that this verification process, which takes six months to a year, only starts after the prisoners have completed their terms.

The process of verifying a prisoner’s nationality should begin the moment he is arrested by India or Pakistan. “The process should be complete at the time of a prisoner’s release so he does not remain in jail after serving his sentence,” says Jatin Desai.

Justice Zahid blames both countries for the delay in releasing innocent fishermen who inadvertently cross national borders while fishing. “These fishermen are usually given a six-month to a year’s jail sentence. By the time they are sentenced, they have already served the term,” he maintains. “If both governments show interest, the process could be completed in less than a month.”

Both the Indian and the Pakistani Supreme Courts have ruled that keeping a prisoner even for a day after he completes his jail term is illegal.

Iqbal Haider has appealed to the Pakistani and Indian governments to release all foreign prisoners over 60 years of age, and to expedite their respective trials by providing them with legal facilities.

Until such steps are not implemented, the issue of cross-border prisoners will remain unresolved. In humanity’s name, if not to gain the goodwill of thousands of affected people, both governments must cut the bureaucratic red tape and existing, outdated protocols – the sooner the better.

Fishy business

Indian fishermen at Wagah border, bundled up against the cold they're unused to, in their native Gujarat. Photo: Times of India

Both countries routinely arrest each other’s fishermen for transgressing maritime boundaries. Released fishermen are routinely repatriated via Wagah border, from where they have to make the tedious overland journey home.

“Gujarat and Karachi are so close to each other, and yet Gujarati fishermen released in Karachi have to travel all the way to Wagah border, and then from Amritsar to Gujarat. Many are from remote villages, and it takes even longer to reach,” says senior Mumbai-based journalist Jatin Desai, who is joint secretary, Pakistan India People’s Forum for Peace and Democracy. “Why should they not be sent back by sea, along with their boats?”

Around 481 Indian fishing boats lie rotting in Karachi harbour. “Each boat costs around 30-40 lakh Indian rupees. Most fishermen are very poor and an entire fishing village chips in to buy a boat,” observes retired Supreme Court of Pakistan Justice Nasir Aslam Zahid.

Justice Zahid, chairman of the Committee for Welfare of Prisoners and a member of the Indo-Pak Joint Judicial Committee comprising eight retired judges – four each from India and Pakistan examining the issue of cross-border prisoners – points out that “even if both countries release all the captive fisherfolk, others will continue to be arrested.”

He suggests setting up a joint committee of officials from India and Pakistan stationed aboard a ship between the two countries to decide cases of fishermen accidentally straying across the maritime border. “The matter can be settled in the sea itself.”

Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum President Muhammad Ali Shah, hoping that India will also release the Pakistani fishermen in Indian jails, suggests that both countries should allow each other’s fishermen to catch fish at a small scale in 50 nautical miles in other’s waters, rather than criminalising this transgression.

A year ago, India and Pakistan agreed to set up a task force with two members each from Pakistan and India to improve the situation. “Pakistan has already nominated its members but India is yet to do so,” says Jatin Desai.

Indian and Pakistani peace activists in a joint press statement of October 2011 had urged their governments to release the fishermen and their boats. Both governments “need to recognise the fact that these traditional fishermen go to the mid-sea for their livelihood. Arresting them and confiscating their boats means depriving their families from the livelihood, and causing them extreme distress,” said the statement… “The issue of fishermen needs to be seen from the humanitarian, not security angle.”

The POWS issue

Not included in the list of prisoners to be released were the two Sikh prisoners. One of them is Sarabjit Singh convicted for bomb blasts in Pakistan in 1990 even though the FIR does not mention his name but that of a Manjeet Singh (Surjit Singh says he is the victim of a mistaken identity; see report ‘Why is Gopal Das free and not Dr Chishty?’ by Shivam Vij). The other prisoner, who has languished for four decadese, is Surjit Singh, a jawan of India’s Border Security Force (BSF), taken prisoner of war in 1971 and given up for dead in 1974. In April 2011, he was found to be alive, in Kot Lakhpat Jail, Lahore, after Khushi Mohammad, an Indian prisoner released by Pakistan on his return mentioned the names of some of his compatriots still in Pakistani prisons.

Both Sarabjit and Surjit have now spent decades in prison, far beyond life imprisonment terms. Pakistan must repatriate them immediately, as human rights activists and lawyers on both sides are demanding.

In addition, both countries must look into the issue of the ‘forgotten’ prisoners of war.

In June 2011, Brian MacMahon, a former master mariner from India, now based in Australia, appealed to the Presidents of India and Pakistan to make efforts to locate and release the POWs on either side, and if they were no longer living, to provide information and their remains to their families in order to get some closure on their missing loved ones.

He cited the example of Australia, which has brought home the remains of every one of its servicemen missing in action 38 years after the conflict in Vietnam (which ended in 1971).

‘Missing’ Indian POWs who have been ‘sighted’ in Pakistan over the years include Major S. P. S. Waraich , Capt Kamal Bakshi, Subedar Assa Singh, and Wing Commander H. S. Gill. The ‘discovery’ of Surjit Singh ignites hope that they and their other colleagues may similarly be alive and undocumented in a Pakistani prison.

In September 2004, then Defence Minister of India, Pranab Mukherjee told reporters that an estimated “17 army officers, two junior commissioned officers and 19 other rank officers are currently in Pakistani jails.”

There are Pakistani POWs in India too. In June 2010, The Daily Mail Today, New Delhi, reported that 18 Pakistan Army personnel taken as prisoners of war in 1965 and 1971 were still in Indian custody, as confirmed by the Indian Ministry of Defence. This is “contrary to all norms of humanity as well in direct contravention of the Geneva Convention… these POWs also include two Majors who went missing during the wars” (June 24, 2010).

Given the number of cases where missing presumed dead armed forces personnel have been found alive in one prison or another, isn’t it time for both countries to make concerted efforts to get these men back – if for no other reason, then in the name of humanity?

Update – with apologies for the oversight, which was entirely inadvertent – I wrote the piece using the most recent accounts  at hand.

Jan 14, 2012: From Senator (R) Iqbal Haider, Senior Advocate Supreme Court

Dear Beena,

I hope you would not mind, my adding to your information that it was in pursuance of the Orders passed by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the Constitution Petition No.48/2010 filed and conducted by me, “pro bono”, on or about 30th July 2010, on behalf of Pakistan Fisherfolks Forum and PILER that the Supreme Court had ordered that all cases of fishermen crossing the border should be heard expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks and that all the prisoners under the Foreigners Act should be released and repatriated forthwith, if they have completed their sentences. In pursuance of these Orders of the Supreme Court more than 442 Indian fishermen prisoners were released and repatriated in one go.

This has started the process of further release of large number of Indian prisoners from Pakistan and Pakistani prisoners from India.

When our delegation comprising Mr. Kuldip Nayar, Mr. Mahesh Bhatt and Mr. Jatin Desai from India and Mr. Justice Nasir Aslam Zahid, Mr. Karamat Ali and the undersigned from Pakistan were received by Mrs. Soniya Gandhi, the Head of Ruling Congress Party, on or about 9th September 2010, to reciprocate our efforts for release of Indian fishermen, Mrs. Gandhi was kind enough to immediately order release of all Pakistani Prisoners who have completed their sentences and if their nationalities have been identified. As a result hundreds of more prisoners of the two countries have been released since then.

The recent release of 179 Indian Fishermen from Malir Jail Karachi was consistently pursued with Pakistani authorities by our team of Mr. Justice Nasir Aslam Zahid, Mr. Karamat Ali, Mr. Mohammad Ali Shah of Fisherfolk and the undersigned. It was due to the consistent efforts of this team that these prisoners were finally released on 7th January’ 12 from Malir Jail Karachi. Any proceedings in the Lahore High Court were not instrumental in release of these Indian Fishermen from Malir Jail Karachi.

I do sincerely appreciate and admire efforts of all members of the Bar or members of the civil society for putting hard work persistently for release of the prisoners as well as for much needed improvements in the relations between our two countries. Warm, cordial, peaceful and open border relations between Pakistan and India is the need of the people of this subcontinent.

The aforesaid is just to put the record straight.

Jan 14, 2012: From B.M.Kutty, Secretary General, Pakistan Peace Coalition (PPC), PILER Center, Karachi:

Dear Iqbal Haider Saheb,

Thank you very much for clarifying how the process of release of India-Pakistan fishermen by the two governments started and how it is still going on, thanks to the untiring efforts of rights activsts like you, Justice Nasir Aslam Zahid, Muhammad Ali Shah, Karamat Ali and others. . Let us also remind ourselves of the fact that  PILER and PFF had been involved in it since 1997 when the first batch of about 500 plus fishermen were released from both sides. Unfortunately, the seemingly unstoppable exercise of arrest and release of poor fishermen on both sides goes on and on. God save the fishermen!!


Syndicated from: Journeys to democracy

Comments (0)

Register your blog:

Enter your blog address below to become a part of the TeaBreak network.

About TeaBreak:

TeaBreak.pk is a blog aggregator that syndicates pakistani blogs and categorizes them appropriately. Our mission is to give our readers a break from work and let them enjoy their blog time. And we are doing this by bringing all the popular blogs of Pakistan on one platform.